-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 May 2006 11:30:12 -0700
>> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> this is what maildir format is. A maildir is a directory with l
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 08:44:03PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 11:30:12 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > this is what maildir format is. A maildir is a directory with lots of
> > text files in them. each text file is a single email with all its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David E. Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 11:30:12 -0700 Andrew Sackville-West
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> this is what maildir format is. A maildir is a directory with
>> lots of text files in them. each text file is a single email
>> wit
On Fri, 12 May 2006 11:30:12 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is what maildir format is. A maildir is a directory with lots of
> text files in them. each text file is a single email with all its info
> intact.
My setup (for a long time) (optional fetchmail), postfix
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> > it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> > email method. That's... unbelievable.
>
> Sure it can, it just uses the SMTP method of access. Want to
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:12 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:42 -0500, Grant Thomas wrote:
> > > I'll bite:
> > > I can't stand it when you guys hijack a thread like this.
> > > And over something so sill
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 03:05:12PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:42 -0500, Grant Thomas wrote:
> > I'll bite:
> > I can't stand it when you guys hijack a thread like this.
> > And over something so silly!!
> >
> > Everyone knows that CLI tools are dead.
> > Windows has sooo
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 14:42:07 -0500, Grant Thomas wrote:
> I'll bite:
> I can't stand it when you guys hijack a thread like this.
> And over something so silly!!
>
> Everyone knows that CLI tools are dead.
> Windows has sooo much of the market share that *nix will die a slow
> horrible death!!!
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:42 -0500, Grant Thomas wrote:
> I'll bite:
> I can't stand it when you guys hijack a thread like this.
> And over something so silly!!
>
> Everyone knows that CLI tools are dead.
> Windows has sooo much of the market share that *nix will die a slow
> horrible death!!!
Hav
I'll bite:
I can't stand it when you guys hijack a thread like this.
And over something so silly!!
Everyone knows that CLI tools are dead.
Windows has sooo much of the market share that *nix will die a slow
horrible death!!!
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:15:04 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> > Well, I use vim and I now type "i" in front of almost every word when I
> > use other editors. Try to top that!
> >
> > (I have the nagging feeling that w
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> Well, I use vim and I now type "i" in front of almost every word when I
> use other editors. Try to top that!
>
> (I have the nagging feeling that we are not doing this flamewar thing
> correctly. Maybe we have to wait for a con
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 13:49:56 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:02:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > >
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 13:49:56 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:02:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
[...]
It's so won
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 13:49:56 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:02:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
[...]
> > >It's so wonderful to have your mail
> > > tak
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:02:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> > >
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> > > it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> > > ema
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20AM -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> > > it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> > > e
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> > it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> > email method. That's... unbelievable.
>
> Sure it can, it just uses the S
Steve Lamb wrote:
You were given many answers that work quite well. If you do not
understand those answers might I suggest researching them instead of
discarding them out of hand and stating the same question to the same
set of
individuals mere days later.
There's the door. Your choice. *wave
Richard wrote:
> and the fact is, coming from a Window and Mac back ground, it would
> appear, that I need some kind of support,
> hence asking the questions (over and over and over ) for the sake of
> protecting what is already running.
Actually what you need is an understanding that in the u
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 22:17 -0400, Richard wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> >Richard wrote:
> >
[snip]
> >Furthermore I think that you're not sure what you want. Look at what you
> >asked for here. You don't want a database solution but you then say a
> >database, SQL, would be ok. So do yo
Steve Lamb wrote:
Richard wrote:
Thought I would re-explain myself
I'm not sure why, people address both of your concerns adequately with
several solutions all of which work just fine. Instead of reexplaining
yourself take a moment to actually examine the solutions people have off
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:46 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >
> >>Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> Does localhost:25 not work for you?
>
> Besides, you must remember that the Mozilla suite and associated
> products are
Ron Johnson wrote:
> After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> email method. That's... unbelievable.
Sure it can, it just uses the SMTP method of access. Want to know what is
unbelievable? mutt not bein
Ron Johnson wrote:
> After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> email method. That's... unbelievable.
Sure it can, it just uses the SMTP method of access. Want to know what is
unbelievable? mutt not bein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> email method. That's... unbelievable.
SMTP server localhost *is* sendmail. Is here, anyway.
- --
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
>>Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Even sub-folders?
>>
>>Not sure, never had a server that did subfolders so never really cared.
>>OTOH I did care that I tried prior to Thunderbird seemed capable of storing
>>sent mail on the
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Even sub-folders?
>
> Not sure, never had a server that did subfolders so never really cared.
> OTOH I did care that I tried prior to Thunderbird seemed capable of storing
> sent mail on the server. Seemed dumb to m
Hi Richard,
Am 2006-05-11 16:17:43, schrieb Richard:
> Looking for a simple method of doing this:
> Main reason for the changes, lost 255,000 email in a mbox format.
> corrupted.
>
> First:
> Don't want to store email into any kind of box
> ie. Mbox
You should use Maildir...
> Want email to be
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 12:35 +1000, Arafangion wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> >Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
[snip]
> >
> I must mention that either because of the location of my INBOX folder,
> or because of the volume of mail I Have, evolution also fails for me,
> Debian Thunderbird is the only mail p
Richard wrote:
> Thought I would re-explain myself
I'm not sure why, people address both of your concerns adequately with
several solutions all of which work just fine. Instead of reexplaining
yourself take a moment to actually examine the solutions people have offered
to see if they fit your
Steve Lamb wrote:
>Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>Even sub-folders?
>>
>>
>
>Not sure, never had a server that did subfolders so never really cared.
>OTOH I did care that I tried prior to Thunderbird seemed capable of storing
>sent mail on the server. Seemed dumb to me to force local folders
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Even sub-folders?
Not sure, never had a server that did subfolders so never really cared.
OTOH I did care that I tried prior to Thunderbird seemed capable of storing
sent mail on the server. Seemed dumb to me to force local folders for sent
mail, drafts and other such sto
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 15:38 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Evolution, T-bird, Mutt, Sylpheed & Outlook, Web Mail are all IMAP-
> > capable MUAs. I've read, though, that T-bird doesn't have good
> > IMAP capabilities, though.
>
> Thunderbird has one of the best IMAP impleme
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Evolution, T-bird, Mutt, Sylpheed & Outlook, Web Mail are all IMAP-
> capable MUAs. I've read, though, that T-bird doesn't have good
> IMAP capabilities, though.
Thunderbird has one of the best IMAP implementations around.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who de
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 15:18 -0400, Richard wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop/courier-IMAP
>
> Ron, Thanks,
> which one of these application would allow me to read and reply to emails?
None. They are not MUAs (Mail User Agents).
Evolution, T-bird, Mutt, S
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:18:05PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop/courier-IMAP
>
> Ron, Thanks,
> which one of these application would allow me to read and reply to emails?
>
none of those are mail clients (programs that read and reply to
Ron Johnson wrote:
fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop/courier-IMAP
Ron, Thanks,
which one of these application would allow me to read and reply to emails?
Rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:08:28PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> Ron,
> What components would I need to make this work for pop3 accounts ( no imap)
pop3 accounts on which end? We've already suggested fetchmail for
collecting mail FROM pop3 accounts and various solutions to put them
into maildir format.
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:40 -0400, Richard wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > How many clients are we talking about? Just you, or a company
> > full of people?
>
> Just me
fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop/courier-IMAP
Works like a *champ*. My wife and I have been using it for two
years w
Ron Johnson wrote:
How many clients are we talking about? Just you, or a company
full of people?
Just me for now...
Rich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:04 -0400, Richard wrote:
> Rich Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
> >
> >> Thought I would re-explain myself
> >>
> >> Regarding Mail,
> >> What I wanted to do, if possible,
> >> is to have the mail fetch from pop3 accounts (several) (
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 13:08 -0400, Richard wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:58 -0400, Rich Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thought I would re-explain myself
> > > >
[snip]
> >
> Ron,
> What components wo
On May 12, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:What you're doing differently is that you're _keeping_ the messages (255K of them) whereas I purge any mailboxes with >10K messages. If you choose to use Maildir, I'd advise that you configure your system to limit the number of messages maintai
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:58 -0400, Rich Johnson wrote:
On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
Thought I would re-explain myself
Regarding Mail,
What I wanted to do, if possible,
is to have the mail fetch from pop3 accounts (several)
( th
Rich Johnson wrote:
On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
Thought I would re-explain myself
Regarding Mail,
What I wanted to do, if possible,
is to have the mail fetch from pop3 accounts (several) ( thousands )
avg 2800 per day
and have spam filters applied and rules applied, and mo
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:58 -0400, Rich Johnson wrote:
> On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
>
> > Thought I would re-explain myself
> >
> > Regarding Mail,
> > What I wanted to do, if possible,
> > is to have the mail fetch from pop3 accounts (several)
> > ( thousands ) avg 2800 per da
On May 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Richard wrote:
Thought I would re-explain myself
Regarding Mail,
What I wanted to do, if possible,
is to have the mail fetch from pop3 accounts (several)
( thousands ) avg 2800 per day
and have spam filters applied and rules applied, and move into
folder, as p
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:48:20AM + or thereabouts, p wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:17:43PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> > Looking for a simple method of doing this:
> > Main reason for the changes, lost 255,000 email in a mbox format.
> > corrupted.
> >
> however, i just wanted to add tha
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:17:43PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> Looking for a simple method of doing this:
> Main reason for the changes, lost 255,000 email in a mbox format.
> corrupted.
>
//
__deletia__
...sorry for the loss and that i don't have a "substitute"
recommendation.
however, i just wan
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:17:43PM -0400, Richard wrote:
> Looking for a simple method of doing this:
> Main reason for the changes, lost 255,000 email in a mbox format.
> corrupted.
>
> First:
> Don't want to store email into any kind of box
> ie. Mbox
>
> Want email to be retrieved from Pop3 ac
Richard wrote:
Looking for a simple method of doing this:
Main reason for the changes, lost 255,000 email in a mbox format.
corrupted.
First:
Don't want to store email into any kind of box
ie. Mbox
Want email to be retrieved from Pop3 accounts,
and (spam filter applied) and moved into folders,
53 matches
Mail list logo
