On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 13:49:56 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:02:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:37:20 -0700, Christopher Nelson wrote: > > [...] > > > > > It's so wonderful to have your mail > > > > take up no more space than an xterm. And to edit your mails in whatever > > > > your /usr/bin/editor happens to be today. > > > > > > > > Alright, let's grease up for a marginally on-topic flamewar! > > > > > > Ooh, a flamewar! Can I play, too? Here's some more gasoline: Don't you > > > think it's incredible that, given the choice of several excellent > > > editors, some people still insist on messing around with a bloated > > > common-lisp runtime engine? > > > > > > > heh, I use emacs -nw as my editor when running mutt, so you could say > > I've got an operating sytem running my mailer running an operating > > sytem. How's that for stupid and backwards;) > > Well, I use vim and I now type "i" in front of almost every word when I > use other editors. Try to top that! > > (I have the nagging feeling that we are not doing this flamewar thing > correctly. Maybe we have to wait for a contribution from the gormless > void to spice things up a little...)
It just goes to show that you can't really intentionally start a flame-war. One can only blindly stumble into them. Or, since we're missing it: I'm not trying to start a flame-war here, just looking for reasoned insight into the following problem: I routinely use both vim and emacs. I use vim for most of my basic text editing (config files and the like) and I use emacs for coding and for email writing. My problem is that I can't break myself of the habit of typing :wq at the end of an emacs session. Clearly emacs is broken in this way, how should I fix it? There, maybe that'll work. A :wq
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
