Re: Local network ip

2000-09-05 Thread kmself
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:43:19PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal sent 20 > bytes on their merry way: > > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a > > home network: 192.168.0.x or

Re: Local network ip

2000-09-05 Thread John L . Fjellstad
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote: > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a > home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using > the second one... Does't matter. It's your private network, so nobody will be

Re: Local network ip

2000-09-05 Thread John L . Fjellstad
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:43:19PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta wrote: > Basically, you can use any number... i don't think you can use 0 > however. Since they're private IPs you can use any IP addressing > scheme you want. If you are only going to have one subnet, i would > use the 192.168.1.x one.

Re: Local network ip

2000-09-05 Thread ktb
On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a > home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using > the second one... > It doesn't matter either way. Here is a link for you -- h

Re: Local network ip

2000-09-05 Thread Spinfire Magenta
on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal sent 20 bytes on their merry way: > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a > home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using > the second one... I have a network at home that is