On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:43:19PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal sent 20 > bytes on their merry way: > > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a > > home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using > > the second one... > > I have a network at home that is rather complicated; A ethernet cable > actually runs next door to my fellow-geek neighbor. > > My internal house network is 192.168.1.x > > My friends subnet is 192.168.2.x > > Basically, you can use any number... i don't think you can use 0
$ /sbin/ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:33:14:D9
inet addr:192.168.0.32 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> however. Since they're private IPs you can use any IP addressing
> scheme you want. If you are only going to have one subnet, i would
> use the 192.168.1.x one.
192.168.x.x are private class-C networks (254 nodes).
127.16.x.x - 127.31.x.x are private class-B networks (65,024 nodes).
10.x.x.x is a private class-A network (16,777,214 nodes).
Use what you want, but be consistant.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Opensales, Inc. http://www.opensales.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
pgplMdM3Nap7O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
