On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 23:47:59 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2020 14:29:08 David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 11:24:46 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't use fish that I know of. Thats not to say mc isn't using
> > > it. In which case someone has be
On Sat 08 Feb 2020 at 10:38:19 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > I'm not aware that there's a faster way of sending the files once
> >> > you've unpacked the archive locally. After all, you've thrown away the
> >> > benefits of compression and aggregation.
> >> rsync?
> > Sure, if you're updati
>> > I'm not aware that there's a faster way of sending the files once
>> > you've unpacked the archive locally. After all, you've thrown away the
>> > benefits of compression and aggregation.
>> rsync?
> Sure, if you're updating a tree. But AIUI the OP is transferring
> a kernel source archive fro
just an ssh -Y connection, which may at times be supplemented as I also
use an sshfs "mount", which works well as long as its user 1000 on both
ends of the cable. Root access is disallowed going either way as part of
my security model here. I've long since given up on ever keeping an nfs
share
On Vi, 07 feb 20, 23:47:59, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't use fish that I know of. Thats not to say mc isn't using
> > > it. In which case someone has been playing with mc that has no clue
> > > what they are doing.
>
> Because mc, 22+ years ago was pretty much self-contained. Now, AF
On Friday 07 February 2020 14:29:08 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 11:24:46 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Friday 07 February 2020 10:20:45 David Wright wrote:
> > > On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 08:12:18 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > I was trying different ways to move a kernel s
On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 16:57:59 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I'm not aware that there's a faster way of sending the files once
> > you've unpacked the archive locally. After all, you've thrown away the
> > benefits of compression and aggregation.
>
> rsync?
Sure, if you're updating a tree. B
On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 18:49:20 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2020 16:24:51 Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > > also claims to be a gigahertz capable switch.
> >
> > IIRC gigabit ethernet doesn't run at gigahertz frequencies.
> >
> > > But file moves to/from the machines in the gar
On Friday 07 February 2020 16:24:51 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > also claims to be a gigahertz capable switch.
>
> IIRC gigabit ethernet doesn't run at gigahertz frequencies.
>
> > But file moves to/from the machines in the garage seems to indicate
> > theres a slow connection of around 10Mb/s somepl
> I'm not aware that there's a faster way of sending the files once
> you've unpacked the archive locally. After all, you've thrown away the
> benefits of compression and aggregation.
rsync?
Stefan
> also claims to be a gigahertz capable switch.
IIRC gigabit ethernet doesn't run at gigahertz frequencies.
> But file moves to/from the machines in the garage seems to indicate
> theres a slow connection of around 10Mb/s someplace in that path.
Is that really 10Mb/s (aka ~1MB/s)?
Ste
On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 11:24:46 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2020 10:20:45 David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 08:12:18 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > I was trying different ways to move a kernel src to the pi for
> > > making and also reached the conclusion
On 2020-02-07 16:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
I don't use fish that I know of. Thats not to say mc isn't using it.
In
which case someone has been playing with mc that has no clue what they
are doing.
mick@slinky:~$ mc
[connect shell link option]
fish: Waiting for initial line...
Enter passphrase
On Feb 07, 2020, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2020 05:53:05 Dan Purgert wrote:
>> [...]
>> a "gigahertz" switch? neat :) (I think you meant gigabit again).
>
> Guilty. Blame it on oldtimers.
Hehe, and I was busy scouring Amazon too...
> [...]
> Anyway, I found an answer, iperf
On Friday 07 February 2020 10:20:45 David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 08:12:18 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I was trying different ways to move a kernel src to the pi for
> > making and also reached the conclusion that mc was for some reason
> > terminally slow at unpacking an .xz ke
On Fri 07 Feb 2020 at 08:12:18 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I was trying different ways to move a kernel src to the pi for making and
> also reached the conclusion that mc was for some reason terminally slow
> at unpacking an .xz kernel and writing the unpack across the network. It
> was pr
Gene Heskett wrote:
...
> So I stopped that, killed the partial copy, backed out and copied the
> whole image to the pi in just 2 or 3 minutes, with mc, then unxz'd it on
> the pi in maybe 3 minutes. Made sure it was set for arch/arm with a
> bcm2835_defconfig, verified it said fully preemptibl
On Friday 07 February 2020 06:24:10 Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, at 07:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > But file moves to/from the machines in the garage seems to indicate
> > theres a slow connection of around 10Mb/s someplace in that path.
>
> Later you said:
> > But on really big write
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, at 07:04, Gene Heskett wrote:
> But file moves to/from the machines in the garage seems to indicate
> theres a slow connection of around 10Mb/s someplace in that path.
Later you said:
> But on really big writes, the ssd's decay to around 17-20 mb/s.
Surely here you meant MB/
On Friday 07 February 2020 05:53:05 Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Feb 07, 2020, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that
> > claims to be a gigabit and managed.
> >
> > One of its ports is connected to the upstream port of another
On Feb 07, 2020, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that claims
> to be a gigabit and managed.
>
> One of its ports is connected to the upstream port of another dumber
> unmanaged 8 port switch that feeds the machines in the g
On Friday 07 February 2020 03:55:32 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 07 feb 20, 03:12:08, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Which tells me its the poor prolonged write speeds of the ssd's that
> > are the main contributors to the slow big files problem. Not much I
> > can do about that. It is what it is.
>
>
On Vi, 07 feb 20, 03:12:08, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Which tells me its the poor prolonged write speeds of the ssd's that are
> the main contributors to the slow big files problem. Not much I can do
> about that. It is what it is.
If you're into testing you could try transferring to/from RAM (e
On Friday 07 February 2020 02:44:11 john doe wrote:
> On 2/7/2020 8:04 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that
> > claims to be a gigabit and managed.
> >
> > One of its ports is connected to the upstream port of another
On Friday 07 February 2020 02:17:59 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 07 feb 20, 02:04:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that
> > claims to be a gigabit and managed.
> >
> > One of its ports is connected to the upstream po
On 2/7/2020 8:04 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that claims
> to be a gigabit and managed.
>
> One of its ports is connected to the upstream port of another dumber
> unmanaged 8 port switch that feeds the machines in the ga
On Friday 07 February 2020 02:17:59 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 07 feb 20, 02:04:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that
> > claims to be a gigabit and managed.
> >
> > One of its ports is connected to the upstream po
On Vi, 07 feb 20, 02:04:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> My local network has 2 8 port switches, one here in this room that claims
> to be a gigabit and managed.
>
> One of its ports is connected to the upstream port of another dumber
> unmanaged 8 port switch that feeds the machin
On 08/08/2008 09:24 PM, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
>>> network. What could be wrong with the laptop configuration?
Firewall???
-- just a guess.
>> Out of curiousity, since they're both debian machines, why not use
>> nfs?
>
> because I wanted to give samba a try. On the other side, in order to
Bob McGowan wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:24:17PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Hello!
I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop.
Bo
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:24:17PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Hello!
I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop. Both
are connected to t
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:24:17PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Hello!
I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop. Both
are connected to t
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:24:17PM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop. Both
>>> are connected to the web trough
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Hello!
I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop. Both
are connected to the web trough a switch witch is connected to a modem.
Both machines work fine regarding the internet
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:56:40AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am running etch at home in two machines: a desktop and a laptop. Both
> are connected to the web trough a switch witch is connected to a modem.
> Both machines work fine regarding the internet. I want to
> connect b
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:38:09AM -0800, christop wrote:
> On 18 jan, 05:20, Evan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would first change the IP address so that one workstation does not
> > have a broadcast address(.0) Try a simple scheme like .1 and .2.
> >
>
> Sorry not having answered before.
> Wh
On 18 jan, 05:20, Evan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would first change the IP address so that one workstation does not
> have a broadcast address(.0) Try a simple scheme like .1 and .2.
>
Sorry not having answered before.
What you said is the point.
You can't use an ip address ending by .0 for y
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:46:41AM +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
> Russell L Harris writes:
>
> > The nice thing about a switch or hub is that (1) it allows you to
> > use common straight cables and
>
> Crossover cables can be easily purchased from any (good) electronics
> shop.
>
> > (2)
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:56:58 +0200
"Nick Demou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> networking two pcs with a twisted (crosslink ) cable _couldn't_ get
> any easier! You just plug the cable to the PCs. That's it.
> Being so simple means it's more stable also (less parts less things to
> go wrong). There
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:36:28PM -0500, Evan wrote:
> As a standard I always purchase red crossover cables. For me, this
> eliminates the confusion.
Many 100 Base-T and most? all? 1000 Base-T support MDI/X; ordinary
cables will work to connect two network cards.
http://www.iol.unh.edu/services
As a standard I always purchase red crossover cables. For me, this
eliminates the confusion.
On 1/18/07, Nick Demou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
17 Jan 2007 19:35:08 -0800, christop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ...
> Yes, but nothing is going through the line for now, and I would like
> it to do somethi
17 Jan 2007 19:35:08 -0800, christop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
Yes, but nothing is going through the line for now, and I would like
it to do something. Learning and understanding before
only buying more (if possible).
Would it be different if it was straight with a switch?
I would first like to
Russell L Harris writes:
> The nice thing about a switch or hub is that (1) it allows you to
> use common straight cables and
Crossover cables can be easily purchased from any (good) electronics
shop.
> (2) it has an LED which gives you a visual indication of the amount
> of traffic flowing.
I
My mistake. .0 is the network address.
On 1/17/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use a cross-over cable all the time between two computers.
Then again, I have the cable. If you don't and you can't make one, then
believe it or not an ethernet switch is often cheaper than a cro
I would first change the IP address so that one workstation does not
have a broadcast address(.0) Try a simple scheme like .1 and .2.
On 17 Jan 2007 19:40:48 -0800, christop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael D. Norwick a écrit :
> christop wrote:
> > I would need information on how to configur
I use a cross-over cable all the time between two computers.
Then again, I have the cable. If you don't and you can't make one, then
believe it or not an ethernet switch is often cheaper than a cross-over
cable.
I have in /etc/network/interfaces:
computer 1:
iface eth0 inet static
Michael D. Norwick a écrit :
> christop wrote:
> > I would need information on how to configure
> > a local network between two computers
> > with only a twested rj45.
> >
> > I have two ethernet cards on each of the two computers
> > I aim to put together.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> < snip >
>
> htt
Russell L. Harris a écrit :
> * Baron Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070117 20:56]:
> > I would need information on how to configure a local network between
> > two computers with only a twisted rj45.
>
> Why mess around with a special crossover cable? Ethernet switches
Is it really more messy?
christop wrote:
> I would need information on how to configure
> a local network between two computers
> with only a twested rj45.
>
> I have two ethernet cards on each of the two computers
> I aim to put together.
>
>
>
>
>
< snip >
http://www.aboutdebian.com/network.htm
michael
--
To UNS
* Baron Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070117 20:56]:
> I would need information on how to configure a local network between
> two computers with only a twisted rj45.
Why mess around with a special crossover cable? Ethernet switches
have become so inexpensive that hardly anyone purchases an ethe
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:43:19PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal sent 20
> bytes on their merry way:
> > I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a
> > home network: 192.168.0.x or
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a
> home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using
> the second one...
Does't matter. It's your private network, so nobody will be
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:43:19PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta wrote:
> Basically, you can use any number... i don't think you can use 0
> however. Since they're private IPs you can use any IP addressing
> scheme you want. If you are only going to have one subnet, i would
> use the 192.168.1.x one.
On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a
> home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using
> the second one...
>
It doesn't matter either way. Here is a link for you --
h
on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:50:57PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal sent 20 bytes
on their merry way:
> I just want to ask which is the better ip network to be set up for a
> home network: 192.168.0.x or maybe 192.168.1.x ?? I'm currently using
> the second one...
I have a network at home that is
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> I would like to telnet from linux on the Micron to Dos/Windows on
> the secondary machine. Can this be done? What DOS/Windows software
> is necessary? (I believe the floppy that came with the ethernet
> adapter has a DOS ppp driver.
Sure, it can
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 07:11:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Local network"
> >
> > I've got 2 pc's at home.
> > 1 win95 and
> > 1 Linux / win95
> >
> > Working in win-environment on both pc's I have a windows-network with the
> > ability to share files.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Local network"
> >
> > I've got 2 pc's at home.
> > 1 win95 and
> > 1 Linux / win95
> >
> > Working in win-environment on both pc's I have a windows-network with the
> > ability to share files. That is: - we share printer, modem and fi
*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "Local network"
>
> I've got 2 pc's at home.
> 1 win95 and
> 1 Linux / win95
>
> Working in win-environment on both pc's I have a windows-network with the
> ability to share files. That is: - we share printer, modem and files on the
> hard-drives.
>
> Can I set t
Sorry of course that should be samba
Down load the smba package, read the instructions and enjoy.
Pete
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ringkjøbing Amt - e-post
>
> I've got 2 pc's at home.
> 1 win95 and
> 1 Linux / win95
>
> Working in win-environment on both pc's I have a windows-network with the
> ability to share files. That is: -
61 matches
Mail list logo
