Kent West wrote:
> Bob Freemer wrote:
>
>>I've discovered one of the remaining few areas where Debian can be a real
>>pain is in hardware detection. I've tested on a number of machines and
>>even debian-installer can't match libranet/ubuntu/knoppix. Any tips on
>>using one of these distros to i
Kent West wrote:
Bob Freemer wrote:
I've discovered one of the remaining few areas where Debian can be a real
pain is in hardware detection. I've tested on a number of machines and
even debian-installer can't match libranet/ubuntu/knoppix. Any tips on
using one of these distros to install plain
Bob Freemer wrote:
I've discovered one of the remaining few areas where Debian can be a real
pain is in hardware detection. I've tested on a number of machines and
even debian-installer can't match libranet/ubuntu/knoppix. Any tips on
using one of these distros to install plain debian? Or
On Monday 09 May 2005 19:29, Bob Freemer wrote:
> I've discovered one of the remaining few areas where Debian can be a real
> pain is in hardware detection. I've tested on a number of machines and
> even debian-installer can't match libranet/ubuntu/knoppix. Any tips on
> using one of these distro
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:49:35 -0400
Bradley M Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:57:18PM -0400, Luc Lefebvre wrote:
> > Hi Bradley,
> >
> > I know that for Woody there is a meta package fore kde called "kde"
> > which Description: The K Desktop Environment
> > A met
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:57:18PM -0400, Luc Lefebvre wrote:
> Hi Bradley,
>
> I know that for Woody there is a meta package fore kde called "kde" which
> Description: The K Desktop Environment
> A metapackage containing dependencies for the core suite of KDE including
> kdelibs, kdebase, kde
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:28:47 -0400,
Bradley M Alexander wrote:
>
> Ok, I ventured out in a new direction. My (nongeek) wife got
> tired of the whole windows/virus/worm thing and asked me to put
> Linux on her machine. I figured she would need a more "refined"
> user experience than I (who prefers t
Hi Bradley,
I know that for Woody there is a meta package fore kde called "kde" which
Description: The K Desktop Environment
A metapackage containing dependencies for the core suite of KDE including
kdelibs, kdebase, kdeadmin, kdegraphics, kdemultimedia, kdenetwork, kdepim,
koffice, and kdeut
On 6 Mar 03 22:35:56 GMT, Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> defaults? The installer is very nice.
Debian supports 11(?) architectures. How many do
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> ...my question is if I do an apt-get
> upgrade, will I officially be converted to sarge, or is there
> more to it
> than that?
I believe you might have to apt-get dist-upgrade when doing a change so
fundamental.
---
>
> While I like a lot about Libranet, my plan was to use it as a short
> cut installer for Debian. I hope that doesn't violate the spirit of
> the free (older) Libranet version. The price of Libranet seems a
> little high to me, considering that they rely on Debian to provide
> security fixes,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a very good one too - it's what I
use). Anyway, the installer and configuration utilities are the property
of the owners, so Debian can't simply adopt it without permission. The
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
> Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> > installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> > default
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> defaults? The installer is very nice.
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a
there would be no reason to 'upgrade' to debian. they basicaly are
debian, with updated packages in some cases, and gui installers and config
tools.
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to
Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm wondering is how stable my unstable woody distro is, and
> since I have everything working pretty well now, I might just leave
> everything the way it is. Reading the list mail, I am thinking that
> woody might be more stable than the my former re
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 03:10:35PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> I got to fooling with debian about a week ago and did an ftp install
> of potato. When I tried to add sound I didn't have anything in
> /usr/src/linux so I downloaded and installed the 2.2.16 kernel. Trying
> to install some piece of so
17 matches
Mail list logo
