On 12/16/24 12:19, Joe wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:06:18 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
I rebooted, and found that k3b still suffers from the lag. Which
apparently messes with its mind. In 2 different dvd writers in this
machine, I was not able to burn the unzipped .iso into a bootable
dvd+rw
On Wednesday, 12/28/16 01:00:52 PM Gary Dale wrote:
> On 28/12/16 12:34 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> > Gary Dale writes:
> >> I'm running Debian/Stretch AMD64 using plasma desktop and I'm trying
> >> to burn a CD image. However when I start k3b, I get an error message
> >> "unable to find cdrecord e
On 28/12/16 12:34 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Gary Dale writes:
I'm running Debian/Stretch AMD64 using plasma desktop and I'm trying
to burn a CD image. However when I start k3b, I get an error message
"unable to find cdrecord executable" along with the suggestion that I
install cdrtools. K3b ref
Gary Dale writes:
> I'm running Debian/Stretch AMD64 using plasma desktop and I'm trying
> to burn a CD image. However when I start k3b, I get an error message
> "unable to find cdrecord executable" along with the suggestion that I
> install cdrtools. K3b refuses to burn the CD image.
>
> There is
On 28/12/16 11:29 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Debian/Stretch AMD64 using plasma desktop and I'm trying
to burn a CD image. However when I start k3b, I get an error message
"unable to find cdrecord executable" along with the suggestion that I
install cdrtools. K3b refuses to burn the CD ima
On 13/06/11 04:22, H.S. wrote:
> On 12/06/11 07:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 12/06/11 11:01, H.S. wrote:
>>> On 11/06/11 07:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf w
On 12/06/11 07:18 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 12/06/11 11:01, H.S. wrote:
>> On 11/06/11 07:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Sorry, I can't help you,
On 12/06/11 06:12 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi, answers inline.
>
>> 12/06/2011 00:12, H.S. wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have experienced this problem on and off for the past several months.
>> But today it was the worst case. I am trying to burn a bunch of mp3
>> files to make an audio CD
On 12/06/11 08:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Excerpts from H.S.'s message of 2011-06-12 00:12:04 +0200:
>
> Afaik Debian uses a vastly inferior version of cdrtools called cdrkit,
> so it may simply be due to a bug in cdrkit.
>
> Regards,
> Philipp
>
>
If it is a bug, it is recent. I have
Excerpts from H.S.'s message of 2011-06-12 00:12:04 +0200:
> Hello.
>
> I have experienced this problem on and off for the past several months.
> But today it was the worst case. I am trying to burn a bunch of mp3
> files to make an audio CD using k3b. I was able to so do for the first
> one after
On 12/06/11 11:01, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 07:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>>> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
>
On Sat 11 Jun 2011 at 18:12:04 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> /usr/bin/wodim -v gracetime=2 dev=/dev/sr0 speed=48 -sao
See how you go on with burning at a much slower speed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Hi, answers inline.
>12/06/2011 00:12, H.S. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have experienced this problem on and off for the past several months.
> But today it was the worst case. I am trying to burn a bunch of mp3
> files to make an audio CD using k3b. I was able to so do for the first
> one after burnin
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 22:02 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 09:32 PM, H.S. wrote:
> > On 11/06/11 09:30 PM, H.S. wrote:
> >> On 11/06/11 09:09 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> Does gnomebaker work?
> >>
> >> Haven't tried it yet. In fact, I have no idea how to use it to burn an
> >>
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:01 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 07:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> >> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >>> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better wa
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 11:09 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 12/06/11 09:52, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> >> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >>> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>
> >> er .. perhaps a dumb question, is a d
On 11/06/11 09:32 PM, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 09:30 PM, H.S. wrote:
>> On 11/06/11 09:09 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Does gnomebaker work?
>>
>> Haven't tried it yet. In fact, I have no idea how to use it to burn an
>> audio CD from mp3 files. It is quite dumb really in that respect.
>
On 11/06/11 09:30 PM, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 09:09 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>
>> Does gnomebaker work?
>
> Haven't tried it yet. In fact, I have no idea how to use it to burn an
> audio CD from mp3 files. It is quite dumb really in that respect.
Sorry, not gnomebaker but nautilus. Haven'
On 11/06/11 09:09 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 12/06/11 09:52, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>>> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>>>
>>> er .. perhaps a dumb question, is a disc mounted while b
On 12/06/11 09:52, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>>
>>
>> er .. perhaps a dumb question, is a disc mounted while being written to?
No. And No.
Eject doesn't care abou
On 11/06/11 07:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
I don't know how Debian currently d
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:37 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
> >> I don't know how Debian currently does mount those drives, but perhaps
> >> this
Additional info:
If it matters, when I insert a blank disc in to the drive, gnomebaker
starts automatically even if I am KDE. I close it promptly and continue
with using k3b. However, the same thing happened when I was able to burn
some cds successfully in the recent few days.
Also, I have returne
On 11/06/11 07:21 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
>> I don't know how Debian currently does mount those drives, but perhaps
>> this isn't outdated:
>>
>> http://www.crazysquirrel.com/compu
On 12/06/11 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
> I don't know how Debian currently does mount those drives, but perhaps
> this isn't outdated:
>
> http://www.crazysquirrel.com/computing/debian/unmounting.jspx
>
>
umount -l /path
Sorry, I can't help you, but perhaps there's a better way to eject a CD.
I don't know how Debian currently does mount those drives, but perhaps
this isn't outdated:
http://www.crazysquirrel.com/computing/debian/unmounting.jspx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:37:38 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> > >> "Unfortunately Sun then developed the CDDL[1] and Jörg Schilling
> > >> released parts of recent versions of cdrtools under this license."
> > >>
> > >> True.
> > >
> > >Given the fact that attacking
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >> "Unfortunately Sun then developed the CDDL[1] and Jörg Schilling
> >> released parts of recent versions of cdrtools under this license."
> >>
> >> True.
> >Given the fact that attacking Sun (the largest donator of OpenSOurce
> > software) is definitely FUD, w
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: winfr...@tilanus.com
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X
>Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:28:50 +0100
>
>>On 01/18/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 01/18/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Hi,
> Can anyone that cares (or, perhaps, is
> schooled in formal logic and needs some exercise) back me up on that
> assertion?
Maybe it is time to stop discussing and look at this discussion from a
distance.
Jörg didn't produce solid evidence for
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
>> wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero
>
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
> wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
> work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
> >Chris Bannister wrote:
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
> >
> >
On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
>Chris Bannister wrote:
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
>
>Everything starting with the word "Unfortunately" in this article is
Chris Bannister wrote:
> Maybe Jörg could comment on the below article:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
Let me answer as quick as your question was:
Everything starting with the word "Unfortunately" in this article is plain FUD.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jör
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 04:31:47PM +0100, Winfried Tilanus wrote:
> On 01/16/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>
> > Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright law
>
> Jörg, this is a severe accusation. If it is true, then it calls for
> immediate action. So I ask you once aga
On Sat,10.Jan.09, 12:30:07, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Still, I have no doubt reportbug could be improved.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/reportbug-ng
Careful, several Debian Developers have complained about it, including
the Release Team:
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/
On Friday 2009 January 16 09:57:53 Jochen Schulz wrote:
>Joerg Schilling:
>> You as a user are not going to run into problems as the Copyright law
>> allows to run software independent from whether it has been published
>> illegally. Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright
>>
Joerg Schilling:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
>> Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
>> there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
>> in trying to educate anyone on this list? You are doing yourself and
>> this list a disservice by repeat
On 01/16/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright law
Jörg, this is a severe accusation. If it is true, then it calls for
immediate action. So I ask you once again: please give us all juridical
details, so we can judge the validity of this a
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Joerg Schilling:
> >
> > As mentioned before: cdrkit is neither free nor working.
>
> Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
> there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
> in trying to educate anyone on this list?
Joerg Schilling:
>
> As mentioned before: cdrkit is neither free nor working.
Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
in trying to educate anyone on this list? You are doing yourself and
this lis
On Thursday 2009 January 15 09:10:21 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> >So you are happy if someone givey you pre-alpha's and calls them
>> > "stable"? This sounds really strange.
>>
>> My first requirement is that the release team does not feel t
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >So you are happy if someone givey you pre-alpha's and calls them "stable"?
> >This sounds really strange.
>
> My first requirement is that the release team does not feel the need to use
> the qualifier "alpha". I did not say that was my only condition. Please
On Monday 2009 January 12 09:41:45 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> >The minimum requirements one need to have on a "stable release" is that
>> > it does not have known bugs at the time of piublishing.
>>
>> We have different requirements for a stable release.
>>
>> >Cdre
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >The minimum requirements one need to have on a "stable release" is that it
> >does not have known bugs at the time of piublishing.
>
> We have different requirements for a stable release.
>
> >Cdrecord had 50 stable releases that match the requirements within th
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
If Paul makes a bug report, this will just add another bug to the long list
of bugs in cdrkit but it will not result in a bugfix.
Since previous bugs files have resulted in a bugfix, I choose not to believe
your predictions of the future.
Given the bug stati
On Sunday 2009 January 11 08:17:19 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Then please follow the Nettiquette rules and send Cc:'s!
The rules for this mailing list are available from the URL I posted. Please
follow them and do not CC me on posts to the list. If you would like to be
CC'd on posts to the list,
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Friday 2009 January 09 09:25:31 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
> >Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
> >authors are not interested in a discussion.
>
> Actually
On Sat January 10 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the
> > process. I'm not sure how it picked that namd/email combo, unless I
> > signed up for reportbug with it long ago I use my yahoo account for
> > some online STUFF where I don't want
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:37:23 -0500
Paul Cartwright wrote:
...
> yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the process.
> I'm not sure how it picked that namd/email combo, unless I signed up for
> reportbug with it long ago I use my yahoo account for some online STUFF
On Sat January 10 2009, Bob Cox wrote:
> Hi Paul - I have just been looking at this bug report of yours, which I
> assume is the one at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511369
yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the process.
I'm not sure how it picked
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:59:52PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 2009 January 09 21:15:31 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for
> >> my bug. If I find it I just add more information by email.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:32:47 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
(b...@iguanasuicide.net) wrote:
> On Saturday 2009 January 10 00:22:17 Bob Cox wrote:
> >Anyway, in your bug report you say you "took out" genisoimage, but then
> >go on to say you were able to successfully use mkisofs. However, on
On Saturday 2009 January 10 00:22:17 Bob Cox wrote:
>Anyway, in your bug report you say you "took out" genisoimage, but then
>go on to say you were able to successfully use mkisofs. However, on my
>system, mkisofs is just a symlink to genisoimage. In fact the package
>description for mkisofs say
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 21:32:20 -0500, Paul Cartwright (a...@pcartwright.com)
wrote:
> On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> > I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
> > discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
> > and not a probl
On Friday 2009 January 09 21:15:31 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for
>> my bug. If I find it I just add more information by email. If I am
>> unable to find it, I'll then use reportbug and generally tell repor
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> It's really a judgement call. I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for my
> bug. If I find it I just add more information by email. If I am unable to
> find it, I'll then use reportbug and generally tell reportbug that "None of
> these are
On Friday 2009 January 09 20:32:20 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
>> I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
>> discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
>> and not a problem in k3b itself. The bug report sh
On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
> discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
> and not a problem in k3b itself. The bug report should be for growisofs.
> I would be surprised if the k3b maint
cate the thread.
> Your description "see thread is debian-user:
> Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X" is much harder
> to find than you might think, especially "later". A link to gmane or marc
> a al. would be best, I think.
here is the orig
On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> ...and you should try to give a more specific description of the
> problem. Does the write process fail?
yes it did. with K3B it would say completed, yet when I ejected the DVD & then
put it back in, it said it was blank. Other times, it wouldstart buri
On Friday 2009 January 09 16:37:23 Wayne Topa wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> it is possible that the bug may need to be reassigned (e.g. to
>> cdrkit or the kernel).
>
>I must be missing somthing here. Running Testing/unstable and the only
>cdrkit I can find is cdrkit-doc. Is this just
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.) A
27;t want to
repeat information you've already given the mailing list, please add some URL
to the bug report that the maintainer can use to locate the thread. Your
description "see thread is debian-user:
Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X" is much h
Paul Cartwright schrieb:
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I'm not sure this is really a k3b bug though -- you said it affected other
programs as well, yes. Please add to the bug what other programs you saw
affected -- it is possible that the bug may need to be reassigned (e.
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.)
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I'm not sure this is really a k3b bug though -- you said it affected other
> programs as well, yes. Please add to the bug what other programs you saw
> affected -- it is possible that the bug may need to be reassigned (e.g. to
> cdrkit or the
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>Followup-For: Bug #499066
>
>done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.) Also,
https://bugs.kde.org/sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
> Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
> authors are not interested in a discussion.
This was not my intention.
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >point me in the right direction.
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Package: k3b
Version: 1.0.5-3
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >point me in the right direction.
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
We strongly recommend that you report bugs in Debian using the reportbug
program. To install and start it, simply run:
aptitude install reportbug; reportbug
I'll
On Friday 2009 January 09 11:19:43 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> I'm glad cdrecord/cdrtools was able to solve Paul's issue. Paul should
>> file a bug with the details so that Debian and the cdrkit project can fix
>> the underlying issue.
>
>point m
On Fri January 9 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> There is a setting in K3B where you specify the paths to the programs it
> uses. (Not sure the exact menu,but it is something like "Configure K3B".)
>
Settings menu-Configure k3b
> If your problem was solved with the original cdrecord, point k3b
Paul Cartwright escreveu:
> point me in the right direction.
> I used to have a working system that could burn a DVD any time I wanted.Under
> SUSE 9-10.1 I could, and under Debian Etch I could, and probably earlier this
> year under Lenny I could. I have now created a large pile of coasters tryi
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I'm glad cdrecord/cdrtools was able to solve Paul's issue. Paul should
> file a bug with the details so that Debian and the cdrkit project can fix
> the underlying issue.
point me in the right direction.
I used to have a working system that c
On Friday 2009 January 09 09:25:31 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
>Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
>authors are not interested in a discussion.
Actually, we are interested in discussion, but the ar
Joerg Schilling escreveu:
> There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
> Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
> authors are not interested in a discussion.
This discussion is happening on the debian-user mailing lists, and in
m
There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
authors are not interested in a discussion. Their mail contained the usual
accusations: the claim that cdrtools is not free and that there is no
On 01/09/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi,
> It does not make sense to inform you about these details.
It is a pity you see it like that, see below.
> The people who are responsible for the violations and the redistributors are
> informed, they know that they are in conflit GPL and and that
>
John Hasler wrote:
> > The people behind wodim do not follow the conditions of the GPL and they
> > do not follow the conditions in the higher worthy Urbebertrechts law.
>
> > Whether the name is used directly or via a symlink does not matter. The
> > original names are used without permission an
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> The DFSG doesn't mention the CDDL specifically, but I'm fairly sure CDDL
> is generally considered a free license. I could be wrong, DFSG-free is
> generally more strict that OSI-open.
The CDDL is DFSG-compliant.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Thursday 2009 January 08 04:14:02 Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>It _is_ a shame
>> that Debian does not come with the bug-free original software but with a
>> replacement that causes many problems for the Debian U
Joerg Schilling writes:
> Well, I did discuss the problems with a German specialized lawyer who is
> also active on the OSS community and it turns out that I am of course
> able to sue the people behind wodim for more than violation.
> ...
> The people behind wodim do not follow the conditions of
On Thursday 2009 January 08 08:08:58 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2009 January 07 10:23:52 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> > The problem with wodim is that it is not a real fork.
>> > A fork is something that is supported,
>>
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Wednesday 2009 January 07 10:23:52 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > The problem with wodim is that it is not a real fork.
> > A fork is something that is supported,
>
> Not true. "In software engineering, a project fork happens wh
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> Debian acuses me for creating an alleged GPL problem.
Debian has accused you of nothing. Debian has determined that the license
conflict you have created could lead to legal problems for its distributors
and so has chosen not to distribute your software.
> Debian on the
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
> >
>
> I've seen you say that several times on this thread (an in other times),
> but I've missed the explanation of exactly why did this allegedly
> happen. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
You should consider filing a bug report (or point us to the relevant one
in case I missed it). Violation of a license or a law is considered RC,
IIUC.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
>
I've seen you say that several times on this thread (an in other times),
but I've missed the explanation of exactly why did this allegedly
happen. I also did not find it in the cdrecord site,
John Hasler wrote:
> Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > This seems to be an interesting claim.
>
> > If you only believe a lawsuit in court, then you would obviously not
> > believe the
> > claims from Debian. Nice to see!
>
> Debian is accusing no one of copyright infringement.
In case you did no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Jörg,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>It _is_ a shame
> that
> Debian does not come with the bug-free original software but with a
> replacement
> that causes many problems for the Debian Use
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
I wrote:
> When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
> decision? If no suit has been filed, where
Disclaimers: IANAL; IANADD; TINLA; TINASOTODP.
On Wednesday 2009 January 07 13:26:33 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > > On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> > > in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distribute
John Hasler wrote:
> Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> > in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
>
> When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
> decision? If no suit has
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
decision? If no suit has been filed, where can we read t
I'm sorry if anyone is on the CC list that doesn't want to be. I was simply
following Joerg's lead. I understand that unrequested CCing is against the
Code of Conduct @ http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct and will
gladly drop your address from my mails if requested.
On Wednesday
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>Joerg doesn't like wodim, because he doesn't really believe people should be
>able to fork his code. (He is the primary developer of cdrecord.) His
This is wrong. The problem with wodim is that it is not a real fork.
A fork is something that is supported, but wodi
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > We had a server outage last weekend. If you still have problems, ask your
> > ISP for help, thousands of people are using ftp.berlios.de without any
> > problem.
> >
> > Jörg
>
> I am having problems getting to this site and downloading updates:
>
> http://freshmeat.net
On Tue January 6 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Wodim certainly had and has it's share of issues, but so has cdrecord. If
> either (a) you don't intend to distribute cdrecord OR (b) you agree with
> Joerg's interpretation of the GPL, I strongly encourage you to install
> cdrecord from Joerg
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 06:17:49 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue January 6 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >Are you sure it it using the "new cdrecord"?
> >
> > What do you understand by "new cdrecord"?
>
> I don't think I knew all of that, thanks for the background. Why do people
> always have
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
