[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I have an EtherExpress Pro 100 PCI card installed in my machine, and typing
> lspci will detect it properly. However, when I try to insmod/modprobe the
> eepro100.o module, I get an error saying the device or resource is busy, and
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:36:39AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have an EtherExpress Pro 100 PCI card installed in my machine, and typing
| lspci will detect it properly. However, when I try to insmod/modprobe the
| eepro100.o module, I get an error saying the device or resource is busy, a
In hanasaki's email, 12-01-2001:
> Support was added to the kernel when Potato was installed. The system
> does not seem to see the card. Any input would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you
>
Is this a eepro100 card, or one of the Intel integrated ethernet
controllers (on the motherboard). I have
> "hanasaki" == hanasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hanasaki> Support was added to the kernel when Potato was
hanasaki> installed. The system does not seem to see the card.
hanasaki> Any input would be appreciated.
Make sure you are using the latest kernel (2.2.18 or 2.4.0, I u
on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:48:46PM -0600, hanasaki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Support was added to the kernel when Potato was installed. The system
> does not seem to see the card. Any input would be appreciated.
Post commands *and* output:
$ cat /proc/version
$ cat /proc/modules
>You may want to try turning off the PNP bios setting for that PCI slot. I
did that
>with the the Intel PR440FX and was able to load the module.
>
>Also look at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
>
>Gary
Thanks for that, Gary. The above link eventually led me to the right
You may want to try turning off the PNP bios setting for that PCI slot. I did
that
with the the Intel PR440FX and was able to load the module.
Also look at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
Gary
David Khoury wrote:
> Just installed Debian Hamm on a machine with an Inte
At 16:05 +0200 1998-04-21, Fabian Knittel wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 18, 1998 at 01:33:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can get some Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and/or PCI cards for free, and
>> I'm asking myself, if these cards are making any problems with Linux. I
>
>> found the dr
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Fabian Knittel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 1998 at 01:33:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can get some Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and/or PCI cards for free, and
> > I'm asking myself, if these cards are making any problems with Linux. I
>
> > found the
On Sat, Apr 18, 1998 at 01:33:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can get some Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and/or PCI cards for free, and
> I'm asking myself, if these cards are making any problems with Linux. I
I only now of my own privat use (not much traffic), but for me, they
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Matt Thompson wrote:
: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:48 -0800 (PST)
: From: Matt Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Cc: Debian User List
: Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B
: Resent-Date: 27 Oct 1997 23:12:49 -
: Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:48 PST Matt Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm trying to install the driver for this card. I followed the
> instructions, and when I executed the compile-command I found at the
> bottom of the eepro100.c file (gcc -DMODVERSIONS -DMODULE
> -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/s
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Matt Thompson wrote:
> > >I saw this network card on the Hardware-HOWTO list, so I was thinking
> > >about buying one (I need a PCI network card, all my ISA's are used up).
> > >I just installed the 2.0.29 source using dselect, and i did an xconfig
> > >as root. When I got
> >I saw this network card on the Hardware-HOWTO list, so I was thinking
> >about buying one (I need a PCI network card, all my ISA's are used up).
> >I just installed the 2.0.29 source using dselect, and i did an xconfig
> >as root. When I got to the Network device support area, I see the
> >entr
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Matt Thompson wrote:
> I saw this network card on the Hardware-HOWTO list, so I was thinking
> about buying one (I need a PCI network card, all my ISA's are used up).
> I just installed the 2.0.29 source using dselect, and i did an xconfig as
> root. When I got to the Networ
> I've found that Debian doesn't recognise the Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+
> ISA card. Has anyone got a solution ?
Yeah, buy another card
I had one of these in a Debian box and had some very strange problems that
I eventually attributed (unwarranted, possibly) to the driver. The card
worked
Daeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've found that Debian doesn't recognise the Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+
> ISA card. Has anyone got a solution ?
Try adding io=0x300,irq=3 to the options line (if you're using
Debian's modconf, or installing fresh) if your card is at 3,0x300. A
friend of mine c
Daeron wrote:
>I've found that Debian doesn't recognise the Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+
>ISA card. Has anyone got a solution ?
The problem might be that you have the card on an address that's not
probed. I always have to patch eepro.c and include my card address in the
list (near the top of the fil
On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
> I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver
> built against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of
> different Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the
> system to lock up under heavy l
Neal R. Dalton wrote:
>
> Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I
> installed Debian 1.1 and tried to get eepro100.c working.
>
> How about other 100Mb cards?
>
> Thanks,
>
I had it working under 2.0.22 and couple of versions below
(that was under RH 3.0.3 distributi
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Vladislav Papayan wrote:
> Neal R. Dalton wrote:
> >
> > Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I
> I had it working under 2.0.22 and couple of versions below
> (that was under RH 3.0.3 distribution) -- are you having
> problems or you are just s
I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver built
against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of different
Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the system to lock up
under heavy load) and the SMC 21041 based card.
If you would like
I just picked up the LAN adapter mentioned in the subject; it
replaces a Cogent BusMaster 960 that sporadically locked up under
heavy load [ick!].
It works perfectly under my primary OS-- NEXTSTEP-- but I can't find
a driver that works for Linux. The driver that dri
23 matches
Mail list logo
