I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver built against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of different Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the system to lock up under heavy load) and the SMC 21041 based card.
If you would like, I have the kernel module built for a 2.0.18 kernel that doesn't have the symbols version stamped; I'd be happy to mail you a copy. b.bum Begin forwarded message: >From agent Sat Oct 26 01: 10:59 1996 Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 01:10:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 20:37:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Neal R. Dalton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org Resent-Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1014 X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org Priority: non-urgent Importance: low Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I installed Debian 1.1 and tried to get eepro100.c working. How about other 100Mb cards? Thanks, Neal -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
