On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Matt Thompson wrote:
: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:48 -0800 (PST)
: From: Matt Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Cc: Debian User List
: Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B
: Resent-Date: 27 Oct 1997 23:12:49 -
: Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:48 PST Matt Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm trying to install the driver for this card. I followed the
> instructions, and when I executed the compile-command I found at the
> bottom of the eepro100.c file (gcc -DMODVERSIONS -DMODULE
> -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/s
On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
> I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver
> built against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of
> different Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the
> system to lock up under heavy l
Neal R. Dalton wrote:
>
> Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I
> installed Debian 1.1 and tried to get eepro100.c working.
>
> How about other 100Mb cards?
>
> Thanks,
>
I had it working under 2.0.22 and couple of versions below
(that was under RH 3.0.3 distributi
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Vladislav Papayan wrote:
> Neal R. Dalton wrote:
> >
> > Has any installed a Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B on a 2.x kernel? I
> I had it working under 2.0.22 and couple of versions below
> (that was under RH 3.0.3 distribution) -- are you having
> problems or you are just s
I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver built
against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of different
Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the system to lock up
under heavy load) and the SMC 21041 based card.
If you would like
6 matches
Mail list logo
