-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-02-26 16:33, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 26/02/2016, Ken Heard wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 2016-02-25 22:46, Bret Busby wrote:
>
>
>
>>>
>>> I currently have and use, seamonkey v 2.29 (.1, I think), a
On 26/02/2016, Ken Heard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2016-02-25 22:46, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>
>>
>> I currently have and use, seamonkey v 2.29 (.1, I think), as the
>> latest version of which I have been aware, has been available as a
>> .deb package.
>
> Is t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2016-02-25 22:46, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 25/02/2016, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On 2/25/2016 7:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> I searched
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
>> That is more than risky.
>> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
> Now that has me puzzled.
> Given that iceape was (I believe) part of Debian 6, I am surprised
> that the LTS that is due to exp
On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> That is more than risky.
> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
Now that has me puzzled.
Given that iceape was (I believe) part of Debian 6, I am surprised
that the LTS that is due to expire on Monday coming, apparent
On 26/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> That is more than risky.
> 1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
> 2) While Ubuntu is based on Debian, there's (sometimes) a huge
> difference in the software releases shipped:
> * libc6: 2.11 (Debian 6) vs. 2.21 (Ubun
That is more than risky.
1) Iceape is EOL since 2013: https://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2819
2) While Ubuntu is based on Debian, there's (sometimes) a huge
difference in the software releases shipped:
* libc6: 2.11 (Debian 6) vs. 2.21 (Ubuntu 15.10)
* libssl: 0.9.8o vs. 1.0.2d
* libgtk
On 25/02/2016, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 2/25/2016 7:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
the package for the iceape su
On 2/25/2016 7:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
AFAIK, Iceape, being the
On 25/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, and no. You can run `apt-get -d install iceape`, and it will
> download the package, and the missing dependencies, to
> /var/cache/apt/archives/. However, if you want to install something on a
> machine without internet access you might be b
On Thursday 25 February 2016 12:59:29 Siard wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> > I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
> > the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
>
> AFAIK, Iceape, being the Debian version of Seamonkey, ha
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:08:20 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> I searched for a .deb package, for iceape, so that I could download
> the package for the iceape suite, to try to install it.
AFAIK, Iceape, being the Debian version of Seamonkey, has been
discontinued for quite some time now. There is only a
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:32:47PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On 25/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
Hello,
Searching for a single .deb & trying to install that is the way
proprietary systems handle it. With Debian, and most other Linux
distros, there's repositories, and tools to handle dependen
Hello,
Yes, and no. You can run `apt-get -d install iceape`, and it will
download the package, and the missing dependencies, to
/var/cache/apt/archives/. However, if you want to install something on a
machine without internet access you might be better off with apt-medium
[1], although I never use
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:32:47 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> Is there a way (a switch for the apt-get command?) to download all of
> the dependencies? I have looked at man apt-get, and, that has an
> option "download" (as opposed to install or find), but I could not
> find, from the man entry for apt-g
On 25/02/2016, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Searching for a single .deb & trying to install that is the way
> proprietary systems handle it. With Debian, and most other Linux
> distros, there's repositories, and tools to handle dependencies. Open a
> command line / terminal and enter
> sud
Hello,
Searching for a single .deb & trying to install that is the way
proprietary systems handle it. With Debian, and most other Linux
distros, there's repositories, and tools to handle dependencies. Open a
command line / terminal and enter
sudo apt-get install iceape
It will pull iceape, and al
On 2015-05-13, Thomas H. George wrote:
> For some years I have been using the iceape suit but some months ago I
> was advised the browser was a security risk - it does always start with
> a notice it should be updated and contains a link to firefox.
>
> With the successful upgrade to Jessie I beli
Hi,
On 03/11/2015 04:14 PM, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Is iceape gone in Jessie?
It got removed from everywhere some time ago due to no longer being
security-supported. See the last four news entries on
https://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceape.html.
> I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:56:27PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> > On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
> > >
> > > I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
> > > apt-cache search iceape
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
> >
> > I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
> > apt-cache search iceape when run from Wheezy but is missing when I run
> > the search from Jessi
On 2015-03-11, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> Actually, your output proves that it ISN'T. All the results are virtual
>> packages, each of which is an Add-On for iceape (caused, presumably,
>> because e.g. xul-ext-adblock-plus provides ice$ANIMAL-adblock-plus.
>
> Doh! I saw lots of iceape entries and d
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:00:38 Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:56:27PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:21:58 Bret Busby wrote:
> > > On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > > Is iceape gone in Jessie?
> > > >
> > > > I am still using it regular
On 11/03/2015, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Is iceape gone in Jessie?
>
> I am still using it regularly in Wheezy and it still shows up in
> apt-cache search iceape when run from Wheezy but is missing when I run
> the search from Jessie.
>
>
iceape is present in Debian 6, but in Debian 7, I believe
Bret Busby wrote:
On 24/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
CAVEAT LECTOR:
I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
Hannibal beware".
:)
And thence, I think that I may have worked out what it means.
"Tread carefully (watch where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
iceape browser is available in squeeze-backports, but not in wheezy or
jessie. It is however available in sid; so it may in time be moved to
jessie. Maybe the sid version may work in jessie now.
The squeeze-backports version of squeeze may work in w
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:11:30PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> CAVEAT LECTOR:
> I'm a newbie who hasn't yet worried about details of internet
> issues.
> I do not see me using other than Seamonkey (or 'clone' thereof)
>
> This morning when I saw your post, I did a preliminary cursory
> s
On 24/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
>>
>> CAVEAT LECTOR:
>
> I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
> Hannibal beware".
>
> :)
>
And thence, I think that I may have worked out what it means.
"Tread carefully (watch where you pu
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> CAVEAT LECTOR:
I didn't get to learn Latin very well, but that seems like "Let
Hannibal beware".
:)
--
Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia
..
"So once you do know what the question actually is,
you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep T
On 24/07/2014, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian
7.x (amd64)?
I have no
Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian
7.x (amd64)?
I have not been able to find one.
Thank you in anticipation.
I'm fairly sure the
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
Hello.
Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian 7.x (amd64)?
I have not been able to find one.
Thank you in anticipation.
I'm fairly sure the whole package was r
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:58:44AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is a .deb package of iceape or seamonky, available for Debian 7.x (amd64)?
>
> I have not been able to find one.
>
> Thank you in anticipation.
>
I'm fairly sure the whole package was removed as no longer supported upstre
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 04:05:38PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I ran a dist-upgrade. View in iceape mail has changed - for the
> worst.
>
> Previously view would show all four of the mail accounts I have and for
> each the choice of mailbox, sent, drafts and trash.
>
> Now only one account i
On 09/06/11 21:41, � wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:26:38 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/11 21:07, � wrote:
>>
>> The sender I see ^ is a question mark character - usually a part of
>> Camaleón's name what character set are you using?
>
> That should be an error from Icedove whe
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:26:38 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 09/06/11 21:07, � wrote:
>
> The sender I see ^ is a question mark character - usually a part of
> Camaleón's name what character set are you using?
That should be an error from Icedove when it converts from "7bit" to
"quoted-p
On 09/06/11 21:07, � wrote:
The sender I see ^ is a question mark character - usually a part of
Camaleón's name what character set are you using?
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:45:46 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/11 16:25, Bret Busby wrote:
>
>>> I am running iceape 1.0.9 on Debian
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:45:46 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 09/06/11 16:25, Bret Busby wrote:
>> I am running iceape 1.0.9 on Debian 5, and I am wondering whether
>> anyone can tell me whether it is compatible with IPv6.
>>
>> Similarly with the version of iceape that is available for Debian
On 09/06/11 16:25, Bret Busby wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am running iceape 1.0.9 on Debian 5, and I am wondering whether anyone
> can tell me whether it is compatible with IPv6.
>
> Similarly with the version of iceape that is available for Debian 6.
>
> Thank you in anticipation.
>
> --
> Bret Bus
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:22 -0400 Thomas H. George wrote:
> This is an occasional problem. For most web sites iceape works
> perfectly.
>
> To identify the source of the problem I started iceape from a terminal
> window and found failure to pre-load libaoss.so is part of the
> problem.
>
> alsa-os
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:22:49 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
(...)
> Script started on Fri 15 Oct 2010 05:12:46 PM EDT t...@dragon:~$ iceape
> ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libaoss.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
> preloaded: ignored.
This could be in connection with this bug:
http://bugs.debian
On 18/09/10 12:52, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>>
(a pyrrhic victory!)
>>> What?
>>
>> Rebirth from the ashes - Phoenix had complications so Firefox was chosen
>> to symbolise the victorious rebirth of, um, - the spirit/ghost of
>> Netscape(?).
>> Supp
>
> On a slightly (more) off-topic question - does any one know how fnord
> Ubuntu gets around the Mozilla Corp. restrictions with Firefox?
>
I know that Ubuntu's Firefox install comes with an addon named "Ubuntu
Firefox Modifications" - I assume they just use that for all their changes.
IIRC the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Scott Ferguson wrote:
(a pyrrhic victory!)
What?
Rebirth from the ashes - Phoenix had complications so Firefox was chosen
to symbolise the victorious rebirth of, um, - the spirit/ghost of
Netscape(?).
Supposedly the revenge of Netscape on fnord Microsoft. (anecdote)
On 17/09/10 23:14, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 00:21, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>>
>> (Going from memory here - so someone please correct me if I'm wrong.)
>>
>> Once apon a time there was Netscape suite - which became Mozilla suite
> In spirit only. Netscape 5 would have been
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 00:21, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 17/09/10 16:40, Bret Busby wrote:
>> read that... (scott)
>> Please note: in an effort to trim the message to which I am
>> responding, I cut most of it out, apart from the stuff above, and the
>> stuff above "Mozilla Corp", above, was p
On 17/09/10 16:40, Bret Busby wrote:
> read that... (scott)
> Please note: in an effort to trim the message to which I am
> responding, I cut most of it out, apart from the stuff above, and the
> stuff above "Mozilla Corp", above, was posted by me, and from there
> down, was posted by Scott (to
Am 23.07.2010 15:59, schrieb Thomas H. George:
> Four or five days ago Iceape began locking up when loading certain
> files. For example, when loading the weather report the forecast would
(...)
> I filed a bug report two days ago but have had no response. Have others
> encountered this problem
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:33:18 -0500
"Thomas H. George" wrote:
> Installed iceape and went to mail/tools/import but the only option was
> to import from thunderbird (not installed). I have the information
> in a folder .mozilla in my home directory. How do I persuade import
> to use this informat
Jochen Schulz wrote:
AG:
I have now located the bookmark.html file and cp'd that over to the
seamonkey directory.
And it works?
Apparently, yes.
Now I need to recover the passwords - does anyone know what those might
be called under Iceape?
Firefox/Iceweasel uses, IIR
AG:
>
> I have now located the bookmark.html file and cp'd that over to the
> seamonkey directory.
And it works?
> Now I need to recover the passwords - does anyone know what those might
> be called under Iceape?
Firefox/Iceweasel uses, IIRC, the files secmod.db and signons*. But that
is do
AG:
>
> Today I accepted the update in Squeeze for Iceape. However, this
> appears to have erased my old/ previous bookmark and password files that
> I used in Iceape before the upgrade. I have searched through all of the
> relevant dot files and I can't see anything. Is this standard proc
AG wrote:
Today I accepted the update in Squeeze for Iceape. However, this
appears to have erased my old/ previous bookmark and password files
that I used in Iceape before the upgrade. I have searched through all
of the relevant dot files and I can't see anything. Is this standard
procedure
There is a message that the problem might
relate to previously opened browers but I had closed the iceape browser
before starting firefox.
Tom
Have the same problem with Firefox. It's pain in the ass, every time
must pgrep firefox and kill 2 Firefox pid but don't have that problem
with SeaMo
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:35:24 -0400
"Thomas H. George" wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:43:17AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:34:23 -0500
> > Chris wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:59 -0400
> > > "Thomas H. George" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Checking I found iceape-suit
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 08:35:24PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I decided to give your approach a try. The installation of Thunderbird
> went well and on start up it recovered all my saved emails and my
> account settings. The Firefox installation has not been so successful.
> The program sta
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:43:17AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:34:23 -0500
> Chris wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:59 -0400
> > "Thomas H. George" wrote:
> >
> > > Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
> > > Squeeze.
> > >
> > > When I upgrade
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:54:19 +0200
godo wrote:
> Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
> > Squeeze.
> >
> > When I upgraded to Squeeze iceape came along but it is a mess. On
> > startup it says a security component is missing and cannot ret
Thomas H. George wrote:
Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
Squeeze.
When I upgraded to Squeeze iceape came along but it is a mess. On
startup it says a security component is missing and cannot retrieve
emails from some sites. In accessing web pages it cannot displ
Quoth Chris at 2009-10-19 02:04...
> I myself abandoned the Debian-stamp of Firefox (Ice-whatever) in favor
> of a direct replacement from Mozilla.
...
> If interested; simply grab your cup of tea from Mozilla, extract it,
> move the Mozilla parent dir (Firefox for example) and move it to /opt.
...
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:37:41 + (UTC)
debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
> Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
> Squeeze.
>
[snipped]
>
> Should I abandon the iceape suite in favor of these individual apps?
Perhaps you could enable the sid source
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:34:23 -0500
Chris wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:59 -0400
> "Thomas H. George" wrote:
>
> > Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
> > Squeeze.
> >
> > When I upgraded to Squeeze iceape came along but it is a mess. On
> > startup it says a
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:59 -0400
"Thomas H. George" wrote:
> Checking I found iceape-suite in Stable and Sid but no longer in
> Squeeze.
>
> When I upgraded to Squeeze iceape came along but it is a mess. On
> startup it says a security component is missing and cannot retrieve
> emails from so
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Brian Marshall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:35:24AM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Problem: Now that I understand to enter about:config in the search field
> > I can find plugin.expose_full_path but cannot edit the value to change
> > it from fal
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:35:24AM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> Problem: Now that I understand to enter about:config in the search field
> I can find plugin.expose_full_path but cannot edit the value to change
> it from false to true. I have tried a number of key combinations that
> work with
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 03:27:14PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 16:50:05 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 13:57:41 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 16:50:05 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 13:57:41 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:19:41PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > > On Sex, 09 Out 20
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:03:06AM +0100, AG wrote:
> Thomas H. George wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >>
> >>I think you should check if iceape actually uses the correct plugin (and
> >>not some outdated file that was left behind during an earlier attemp
Thomas H. George wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
I think you should check if iceape actually uses the correct plugin (and
not some outdated file that was left behind during an earlier attempt to
get flash working, for example).
Here is how to do that (
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 13:50, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> Ah-ha! Found the difference. The listing for Shockwave Flash is
> identical to that shown below except for the entry for the File Name:
>
> For the system that doen't play videos: npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
>
> For the system that plays
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 13:57:41 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:19:41PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > On Sex, 09 Out 2009, "Thomas H. George" wrote:
> > > >I have two computers with uptodate
Thomas H. George wrote:
> flashplugin-nonfree is already the newest verion.
>
This should happen automatically, but it won't hurt to run
update-flashplugin-nonfree --install
Afterwards, check if your browser detects the plugin as Florian said.
--
"Atomic batteries to power, turbines to spee
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 13:57:41 -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:19:41PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > On Sex, 09 Out 2009, "Thomas H. George" wrote:
> > >I have two computers with uptodate Squeeze sytems including gdm, icewm
> > >and the iceape suite. In one s
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:19:41PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On Sex, 09 Out 2009, "Thomas H. George" wrote:
> >I have two computers with uptodate Squeeze sytems including gdm, icewm
> >and the iceape suite. In one system the iceape browser can play youtube
> >videos, in the other system
On Sex, 09 Out 2009, "Thomas H. George" wrote:
I have two computers with uptodate Squeeze sytems including gdm, icewm
and the iceape suite. In one system the iceape browser can play youtube
videos, in the other system cannot.
The system that cannot play youtube videos has installed same plugins
> On 2009-07-25 13:13, Gerard Robin wrote:
>> Thank you to the programmers who maintain iceape again.
On 25.07.09 13:50, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Honest question: why use iceape/SeaMonkey? What benefits does it give
> you above firefox/tbird/pidgin?
forgot sunbird :-)
...that's just it ;-)
--
Ma
Sven:
Thanks. That was the problem. Using about:config in the location
bar, I found that the permissions had been set to 3; I set it to 1 (the
default) and everything works now.
Sebastian Canagaratna
Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-07-25 17:40 +0200, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
I am usi
On 2009-07-25 13:13, Gerard Robin wrote:
Thank you to the programmers who maintain iceape again.
Honest question: why use iceape/SeaMonkey? What benefits does it
give you above firefox/tbird/pidgin?
--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
On 2009-07-25 17:40 +0200, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
> I am using Debian Testing and Iceape as well as Epiphany
> Browser. Epiphany has no problems when I view files from, e.g.,
> Wikipedia of displaying png files and svg files directly on the html
> page. With Iceape however, there is an emp
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-25 10:40, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
Hi:
I am using Debian Testing and Iceape as well as Epiphany Browser.
Epiphany has no problems when I view files from, e.g., Wikipedia of
displaying png files and svg files directly on the html page. With
Iceape however
On 2009-07-25 10:40, Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
Hi:
I am using Debian Testing and Iceape as well as Epiphany Browser.
Epiphany has no problems when I view files from, e.g., Wikipedia of
displaying png files and svg files directly on the html page. With
Iceape however, there is an empty bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Felix Miata wrote:
>>> After reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2009/02/msg00411.html and
>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511477 the current status
>>> of
>>> IceApe is about as clear as Mu
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > After reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2009/02/msg00411.html and
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511477 the current status
> > of
> > IceApe is about as clear as Mud. It refused to install via apt-get,
> > synaptic,
> > and gnome-app-insta.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix Miata wrote:
> After reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2009/02/msg00411.html and
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511477 the current status of
> IceApe is about as clear as Mud. It refused to install via apt-get, synapt
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
From: Michelle Konzack
To: debian-user-fre...@lists.debian.org
Cc: Gerard Robin
Subject: Re: iceape sorti de debian
Mail-Followup-To: linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net,
debian-user-fre...@lists.debian.org
Organization
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:00:30 +0100, Gerard Robin posted:
> Hello,
> iceape is no more part of debian, I would like to know if is it possible
> to install the package seamonkey of ubuntu in sid ?
>
It was dropped from Debian because no one stepped up to act as maintainer,
you may be able to do yo
Gerard Robin wrote:
Hello, iceape is no more part of debian, I would like to know if is it
possible
to install the package seamonkey of ubuntu in sid ?
Not recommended. Don't mix Ubuntu and Debian.
My advice is install separate equivalents of the the parts of iceape.
Like, install icewease
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:43:55PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Thomas H. George wrote:
> > Suddenly Iceape has started blocking images replacing them with a top
> > row of black diamonds containing question marks. The images are not
> > just popup ads. For example, if I click on Help/Abou
Thomas H. George wrote:
> Suddenly Iceape has started blocking images replacing them with a top
> row of black diamonds containing question marks. The images are not
> just popup ads. For example, if I click on Help/About Plugins I get a
> page which is blank except for a row of the black diamond
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to install the lightning extension under iceape, I downloaded
>
>
> I think it is for icedove, not iceape. Also, it is named:
> ii iceowl-extension 0.7-2 Calendar Extension for Thunde
Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
I want to install the lightning extension under iceape, I downloaded
I think it is for icedove, not iceape. Also, it is named:
ii iceowl-extension 0.7-2 Calendar Extension for Thunderbird/Icedove
Regards.
it, but I don't see the Tolls->AddOns option to instal
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:42:47PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> There's another process doing things with dpkg at the time this loop
> happens. I don't know what process that is or I'd kill it and let it
> come to life later. The ps command isn't showing anything out of the
> ordinary.
Ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/15/08 12:42, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> There's another process doing things with dpkg at the time this loop
> happens. I don't know what process that is or I'd kill it and let it
> come to life later. The ps command isn't showing anything out of t
There's another process doing things with dpkg at the time this loop
happens. I don't know what process that is or I'd kill it and let it come
to life later. The ps command isn't showing anything out of the ordinary.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/08 22:27, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I tried installing the browser with dependencies and have a nearly never
> ending loop running with dpkg because dpkg can't get a lock it needs. I
> had read that that browser was accessible elsewhere but it a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Bret Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:42:33 -0800
> > From: Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user
> > Subject: Re: Iceape
&
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Bret Busby wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, mess-mate wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
In the last week, Debian etch (4.0) advised me that updates were
available, the updates on a particular occasion, being Iceape.
So, being a good linux user, I did the upgrade, to keep my system
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, mess-mate wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
In the last week, Debian etch (4.0) advised me that updates were
available, the updates on a particular occasion, being Iceape.
So, being a good linux user, I did the upgrade, to keep my system up
to date, and as stable and secure as i
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Kelly Clowers wrote:
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:42:33 -0800
From: Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: Iceape
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:42:56 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:13 AM, mes
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:13 AM, mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure ?
> The latest (etch) is version 1.5.0.14pre (20080208)
> So is mine (etch)
You must be looking at the wrong package. The latest stable
Iceape/SeaMonkey is 1.1.x. The development version is
2.0a1pre (2.0 pre
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
