Sid Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
> what do you mean by trimming?
> Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
>
> On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> >
>
Sid Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
> what do you mean by trimming?
> Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
>
> On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> >
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:11:32AM -0400, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
>
> And I'm much too lazy to bother using a newsreader for anything other
> news. What is it with you guys and newsreaders? Ick.
You are going to have to try harder than that to get the Gnus users to
bite. :-)
--
Chris.
==
--
Sid Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
> what do you mean by trimming?
> Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
>
> On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:50:06PM -0400, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> I think trimming means keeping sideburns at an acceptably trimmed level
> until lamb chops are back in style, for males. Females shall keep their
> runways appropriately devoid of any shoulder dandelion weeds.
If that's a joke I do
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
It's easy to get over it. Just look at the top posted and bottom
posted me
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:59:12PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
> what do you mean by trimming?
> Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
It's easy to get over it. Just look at the top posted and bottom
posted messages here and see for you
Sid Arth wrote:
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
or any other email clien
Ahh you will have to excuse me, but what exactly is top posting and
what do you mean by trimming?
Ill try to fix it myself if I can.
On 9/26/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
>
> > or any other email client. Those two do every
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:12:50PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> or any other email client. Those two do everything I need them to do.
Apparently they don't do any automatic proper email formating (no
top-posting and proper trimming). You still have to do that yourself!
Regards,
Andrei
P.S. Sorry
I still use gmail because I can access it everywhere, and if I use it
with google reader, I have no need for a something such as thunderbird
or any other email client. Those two do everything I need them to do.
On 9/25/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:06:38 -0400
> "
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:06:38 -0400
"Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
> > "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
> > > google
Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:07:19 -0400
> Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Being super lazy by nature, I count the number of key strokes to achieve
>> the end result. If you are using knode all it takes is one key stroke -
>> 'r'. Comparing that to your method count
On 9/25/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
> "Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
> > google search algorithm over my mailbox, google talk in the sidebar
> > (not used often, but ver
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:38:29 -0400
"Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're able to run client software (i.e. you're on your own system,
> > not on some possibly locked down public one), why not just use your
> > favorite proper emai
On 9/25/07, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're able to run client software (i.e. you're on your own system,
> not on some possibly locked down public one), why not just use your
> favorite proper email client?
For me, it's a matter of all clients sucking. Gmail gives me the
google sea
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:07:19 -0400
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric d'Alibut wrote:
>
> > On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only)
> >> to the list is a bit pain.
> >
> >
On 9/24/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> > I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
> > the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
> As far as I know (I don't use the web interfa
On 9/25/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Being super lazy by nature, I count the number of key strokes to achieve the
> end result. If you are using knode all it takes is one key stroke - 'r'.
> Comparing that to your method counts as a pain in my dictionary :-)
And I'm much
On 9/25/07, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hit reply. If it's a new question, post to a new thread. Your new
> question deserves its own thread. If you're replying to an existing
> thread, reply ought to do it, barring serious breakage of standeards
> by your newsreader. What newsread
Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only)
>> to the list is a bit pain.
>
> I just hit 'reply,' delete the poster's email, and then start to type
> d-e-b and gmail pops up a li
Sid Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
Perfect place.
> am a bit new to mailing lists and so on. I was wondering how to
> reply to a message but in a way so everybody in the list gets it,
> but without starting a whole new thread.
On 9/24/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gmail currently does not have a reply-to-list feature so replying (only) to
> the list is a bit pain.
I just hit 'reply,' delete the poster's email, and then start to type
d-e-b and gmail pops up a list in which I select
[EMAIL PROTEC
Sid Arth wrote:
> Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
> am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
> I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
> the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread.
> I am a gmail user so if this que
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:21:14 -0400
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:18:03 +0300
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> > > Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
> > > a
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:18:03 +0300
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> > Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
> > am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
> > I was wondering how to reply to a messa
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote:
> Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I
> am a bit new to mailing lists and so on.
> I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in
> the list gets it, but without starting a whole new t
27 matches
Mail list logo
