On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:21:14 -0400 Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:18:03 +0300 > Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Sid Arth wrote: > > > Im sorry if this isnt the best place to voice such a question, but I > > > am a bit new to mailing lists and so on. > > > I was wondering how to reply to a message but in a way so everybody in > > > the list gets it, but without starting a whole new thread. > > > I am a gmail user so if this question makes no sense, I apoligize, but > > > those of you who do use it probably have noticed how gmail > > > conveniently groups conversations together. Is there a way of replying > > > that will keep that intact? > > > > As far as I know (I don't use the web interface) the normal reply does > > not brake the threading, but it will go to the poster and not to the > > list. You should use the reply-to-all and then delete the posters > > address from the Cc, or use reply and replace the poster with the list > > address. > > One can also use Gmail's POP service and use a proper client. Oh, sorry, Andrei, I missed your implication that that's what you, too, do. Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
