Yi Zhao wrote:
hi, all:
I have a disk which install windows(30G) and debian(30G), but
sometimes ago, my debian is broken, so I want to resintall it on the
exists partitions(I don't want to create other new partitions), but,
when I run the installation program, I can't find the operation to
fi
ing and are not sure how to
answer, again, break off the install and ask this list for detailed
help. Include the exact wording of the question that confuses you.
Hope this helps,
Paul
> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>
>
> From: Thierry Chatelet
> Subject: Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yi Zhao wrote:
> yes, I do this, but, when I choose this, it tell me this operation will
> create a new partitions on this disk, I think this will erase my data on
> my disk, so I choose "go back"
The way I understand it "create new partition" actuall
- On Wed, 5/27/09, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>
> From: Thierry Chatelet
> Subject: Re: hi, all, help me with debian installation!!
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 6:56 PM
>
> On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:46:20 Yi Zhao wrote:
>> hi, all:
>&
Chatelet wrote:
From: Thierry Chatelet
Subject: Re: hi, all, help me with debian installation!!
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 6:56 PM
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:46:20 Yi Zhao wrote:
> hi, all:
> I have a disk which install windows(30G) and debian(30G), bu
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:46:20 Yi Zhao wrote:
> hi, all:
> I have a disk which install windows(30G) and debian(30G), but sometimes
> ago, my debian is broken, so I want to resintall it on the exists
> partitions(I don't want to create other new partitions), but, when I run
> the installation pro
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:41:55PM +, sena wrote:
> On 10/01/2001 at 11:12 -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> >
>
> Then came ANSI C, a standardization of the language. K&R2 was published to
> comply with the standard. ANSI C (and K&R2) used a new style in several
> points of the language. One
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:34:23AM -0800, Henry House wrote:
> Are you sure?
>
> romana:~/$ file /usr/sbin/useradd
> /usr/sbin/useradd: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, Alpha (unofficial), version 1,
> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
>
> (Probably say something else on your system, but
Quoting sena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Ken Thompson invented B in 1970. He did it for the first UNIX system, running
> on the DEC PDP-7. It was an experimental language.
>
> B was inspired on BCPL (Basic Combined Programming Language), by Martin
> Richards. BCPL was a simplification of CPL (Cambridg
On 10/01/2001 at 11:12 -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie "invented" Unix. The "R" comes from
> Dennis' last name. The "K" comes from another person actually. His name
> is "Brian Kernighan". He invented the programming language "B", which
> Dennis Ritchie evolved int
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:44:09AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> heh... i completely missed that. henry, what's up with the K+R? ;)
Ask Tom Christiansen. :-P
> and i'm a competant enough C programmer to know you can call scripts from C,
> but that wasn't the point. useradd is a script,
>> > Interesting. That's not ANSI C. (It's K&R style)
> heh... i completely missed that. henry, what's
> up with the K+R? ;)
Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie "invented" Unix. The "R" comes from
Dennis' last name. The "K" comes from another person actually. His name
is "Brian Kernighan". He i
heh... i completely missed that. henry, what's up with the K+R? ;)
and i'm a competant enough C programmer to know you can call scripts from C,
but that wasn't the point. useradd is a script, not a C executable. so i
have no idea why it would honor his request for setuid since he didn't
men
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:08:12PM -0800, Henry House wrote:
[snip]
| It is a kernel restriction (warranted or paranoid as the case may be) but it
| can be bypassed if need be by writing a little C wrapper:
|#define REAL_PATH "/path/to/script"
|main(ac, av)
|
"Sathish" == Sathish C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All
> I want to give permission to create and delete users on my
> machine,to some specified users. I tried giving execute permissions
> on useradd and userdel to those users. It did not work. Then I set
> setuid bit and tried. It worked.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:44:12PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> hmmm... i was under the impression that suid wasn't honored for scripts?
>
> or was that just bash scripts?
It is a kernel restriction (warranted or paranoid as the case may be) but it
can be bypassed if need be by writing a lit
hmmm... i was under the impression that suid wasn't honored for scripts?
or was that just bash scripts?
pete
On Wed 10 Jan 01, 11:09 AM, Sathish C said...
>
> Hi All
>
> I am having debian linux on my machine.
>
> I want to give permission to create and delete users on my machine,to
> some sp
In a stats colum in linux format this month, it said:
64,000 is the maximum number of users that could connect to a linux box before
kernel version 2.4
With a 2.4 kernel, you can have 4.3bn connections. I'd image that the
structures to handle this number of user ids must be implace otherwise thi
In a stats colum in linux format this month, it said:
64,000 is the maximum number of users that could connect to a linux box before
kernel version 2.4
With a 2.4 kernel, you can have 4.3bn connections. I'd image that the
structures to handle this number of user ids must be implace otherwise this
> can anybody tell me tha maximum number of users that can be created on
> debian linux if there i sany such limit.
Well under the 2.4 kernel, the maximum number of users and groups
seems to be a mere 4.2 billion, if Joe Pranevich is to be believed:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=200
16 bits worth of users, although some people are working on 32bit
UUIDs
What's the status for that on Linux ?
-=Francois=-
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Sathish C wrote:
> Hi All
>
> can anybody tell me tha maximum number of users that can be created on
> debian linux if there i sany such limit.
> Plea
Well the user id field in the password file is an unsigned int,
i.e. 32bits on a PC...
So .. lots !
Course, it may be limited by other considerations..lol
Cliff
I think I remember reading somewhere that because users have 16bit uid's
> by default, the maximum is 64k or so (65,536). But you can
I think I remember reading somewhere that because users have 16bit uid's
by default, the maximum is 64k or so (65,536). But you can have 32bit
uid's if you're brave I also believe.
Cheers,
Corey J. Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Sathish C wrote:
> Hi Al
On Saturday 02 December 2000 14:50, Tim Uckun wrote:
> Actually SSH was not working ither. It was never installed (wh not?) then
> I did a apt-get ssh and it said there was a dependency for libssl09 so I
> did a apt-get libssl09 but it could not find it. Well I decided to do a
> reinstall figuring
On Friday 01 December 2000 23:35, Tim Uckun wrote:
> digging around a bit I found out I was running on run-level 2! WTF?? I then
> changed the inittab and did a reboot (just to be sure) and bash segfaulted
> on me.
Note that run level 2 is the default run level in debian. I never did
understand
At 03:03 PM 12/2/2000 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/00 2:52:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why runlevel 2? That makes no sense to me.
It's the second one you need.
I thought runlevel 2 was no network? I have always ran linux on runlevel 3.
The tricky
At 08:59 AM 12/2/2000 -0500, you wrote:
Yikes! Run level 2 is the debian default.
You sure didn't need to reinstall on that score.
Sorry if I was too late.
Actually SSH was not working ither. It was never installed (wh not?) then
I did a apt-get ssh and it said there was a dependency for l
At 10:07 PM 12/1/2000 -0600, Dean wrote:
Hi Tim:
congrats on the install. As to your question:
I'm not sure what you where trying to type but
the error message sounds like what I get when I
1.have the wrong location. 2.using the wrong command
to open it. 3.don't have proper authority to get in
Hi Tim:
congrats on the install. As to your question:
Tim Uckun wrote:
cut
> right now I am having an odd problem when I type which "something" it says
> shell-init: could not get directory: getcwd: cannot access parent
> directories: nosuch file or directory
I'm not sure what you where tr
> > Ah! the name was "perforate"
>
> I have Debian Hamm and this program is really undocumented :(
my apologies. The perforate package does not contain the needed program.
It is in package binstats :)
and as for perforate, i've got slink, and it has some mans
Marcin
--
-
Subject: Hi all and a question
Date: Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 11:52:40PM +0200
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new at this list and I want to ask something:
> Is there any program to check which libraries are unused on a
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:47:48AM +, John Carline wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new at this list and I want to ask something:
> > Is there any program to check which libraries are unused on a system, so,
> > any program doesn't depends on them ?
> >
> > Many than
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 31-Aug-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new at this list and I want to ask something:
> > Is there any program to check which libraries are unused on a system, so,
> > any program doesn't depends on them ?
> >
>
> **ASSU
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new at this list and I want to ask something:
> Is there any program to check which libraries are unused on a system, so,
> any program doesn't depends on them ?
>
> Many thanks.
>
>
> Juli-Manel Merino Vidal
> [EM
On 31-Aug-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new at this list and I want to ask something:
> Is there any program to check which libraries are unused on a system, so,
> any program doesn't depends on them ?
>
**ASSUMING** all items on your system are packages, go into dselect and use
35 matches
Mail list logo
