On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 01:19, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:07:27 +0100, Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
[snip]
> I think it tells volumes about his judgment -- or lack
> thereof. So how much creden
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 13:07:27 +0100, Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
>> *plonk* yourself.
>>
>> killfiled I am FED up with you.
> If you killfile Colin Watson, you obviously dont want good
> advice. Therefore I suggest you unsu
--Qz2CZ664xQdCRdPu
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87"
Content-Disposition: inline
--BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:06:59PM -0700, Alan Connor w
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 13:57, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> I wasn't trying to harass anyone. I just replied to the thread and sent
> a copy to Alan Connor. I usually respond to both the list and people's
> email address, most people don't mind this. Some do and I try not to do
> it to the people that do
--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv"
Content-Disposition: inline
--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:50:45AM -0400, Greg Folkert
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> > I definitely did not harass you on purpose. I simply replid to a message
> > in this thread and sent a copy to you as well. Then I got your C-R
> > message and replied to that. Then I was bombarded by 100s of co
Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> I definitely did not harass you on purpose. I simply replid to a message
> in this thread and sent a copy to you as well. Then I got your C-R
> message and replied to that. Then I was bombarded by 100s of copies of
> my response to your C-R challenge.
Moral of this story:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:52:06PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > If you killfile Colin Watson, you obviously dont want good advice. Therefore
> > I suggest you unsubscribe as you have no reason left for being on the
> > list.
>
> Omigod! He's killfiled Col
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 18:36:20 2003
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:53:17AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:53PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > > S`econd-of-all, MORE people here agree with me than disagree with
> > > me. They simply don't post their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> I did not SAY "lurkers". The people that mail me post on the list regularly
> but usually not on the CR thread.
People on this list give back the respect they are given. Also, I
don't see
> S`econd-of-all, MORE people here agree with me than disagree with me.
> They simply don't post their opinions on the list for fear of being
> attacked
> by the pro-spam faction here.
>
> So they mail me instead. That's fine.
>
>
> Alan
>
You're delusional.
Pro-Spam Faction?
WTF?
--
To UNS
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> *plonk* yourself.
>
> killfiled
> I am FED up with you.
If you killfile Colin Watson, you obviously dont want good advice. Therefore
I suggest you unsubscribe as you have no reason left for being on the
list.
[I would have sent this
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 02:00:09 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:53:17AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:53PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
>
> "The lurkers support me in e-mail" has been a standard net.kook claim
> for quite some time
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 19:12:24 2003
>
>
> Alan Connor wrote:
>
> >First-of-all, if you think this thread doesn't belong on the list, then
> >why did you respond to it?
> >
> >
> Ah yes... the ol' "Ad Hominem" argument falacy
>
> "Gee officer... I was speeding? Well, if you p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:06:59PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> Here's the Person who's been harassing me:
Like we care. Take it through the proper channels.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > *plonk* yourself.
> >
> > killfiled
> > I am FED up with you.
>
> If you killfile Colin Watson, you obviously dont want good advice. Therefore
> I suggest you unsubscr
Alan Connor wrote:
First-of-all, if you think this thread doesn't belong on the list, then
why did you respond to it?
Ah yes... the ol' "Ad Hominem" argument falacy
"Gee officer... I was speeding? Well, if you pulled me over, then you
must have been speeding, too. So YOU'RE under arre
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:53:17AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:53PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > S`econd-of-all, MORE people here agree with me than disagree with me.
> > They simply don't post their opinions on the list for fear of being attacked
> > by the pr
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 17:03:39 2003
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:06:59PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> >
> > Here's the Person who's been harassing me:
> >
> >
>
> What does this have to do with Debian?
>
> If you want sympathy, I think this might not be the place to get it,
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:00:47 -0700
Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless the dude harrassing you is the list moderator/admin, then I don't
> see how this thread should have been started in Debian-User.
Wait... I thought Alan Connor NEVER got harassing email thanks to...
*Fanfare*
On Saturday 09 August 2003 00:07, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:41:02PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > *plonk* yourself.
> >
> > killfiled
> > I am FED up with you.
>
> If you killfile Colin Watson, you obviously dont want good advice.
> Therefore I suggest you unsubscribe as you
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 19:06, Alan Connor wrote:
> Here's the Person who's been harassing me:
>
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 15:44:11 2003
> Status: U
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from pop.earthlink.net [207.217.121.216]
> by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:53:17AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:53PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > S`econd-of-all, MORE people here agree with me than disagree with
> > me. They simply don't post their opinions on the list for fear of
> > being attacked by the pro-s
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:53PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 17:03:39 2003
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:06:59PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the Person who's been harassing me:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > What does this have to do with D
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:06:59PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
>
> Here's the Person who's been harassing me:
>
>
What does this have to do with Debian?
If you want sympathy, I think this might not be the place to get it, as
you have been offered many opinions on your POV in another thread, and
25 matches
Mail list logo
