Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
>> Other than the venerable emacs? Quanta, Bluefish, Mozilla Composer.
>
> If it doesn't pass the W3C's validator at http://validator.w3.org/,
> it's not HTML. None of the ones you named
-- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 10 June 2003, 01:42 AM -0700):
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the
> > top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and i
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Good Open Source Web Development software
>
>
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > It works
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 11:18, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > C:\Windows\> reportbug
> > The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
>
> Try emailing them.
>
Sorry, I should have included \begin{humor} and \end{humor}
joerg
--
Gib GATES keine Chance!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:43:05AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> C:\Windows\> reportbug
> The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
Try emailing them.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debi
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:00:06AM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:11, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > So contrary to popular belief, we should not design web pages to be
> > IE compliant, since they do not meet OPEN standards. Is this
> > surprising?
>
> Well, the problem is, the o
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 03:01, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I've yet to see it do that, but if that's the case, that's IE's
> problem, go file a bug report with Microsoft instead of coding to
> thier stupidity.
C:\Windows\> reportbug
The command "reportbug" is either misspelled or could not be found.
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 19:18, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:11, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
>
> > To sum it up, yes, it is possible to easily design a fully W3C
> > compliant web page, which IE is not able to handle correctly. Two
> > years ago, I would have ignored this problem, arguing that many
> > people are using NS. But, nowadays
> To sum it up, yes, it is possible to easily design a fully W3C compliant
> web page, which IE is not able to handle correctly. Two years ago, I
> would have ignored this problem, arguing that many people are using NS.
> But, nowadays, how can I convice myself to ignore 90% ?
So contrary to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> I'm afraid this is not the case Paul. IE is not always able to render
> fully compliant pages, in a decent way.
I've yet to see it do that, but if that's the case, that's IE's
problem, go
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2003 14:03, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP
> > machine and was wondering what Op
I don't know; a home built gtk-gl version also bombs, but a build
against lesstif works fine.
You could do:
cd /usr/src ; apt-get source amaya
modify the debian/rules file to say --without-g...
then build a package ("debian/rules -b") sans gtk-gl.
I've used "../configure --with-x --withou
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:15:13PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you
> > > look at the top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them ar
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:42:07AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > I read a while back that Amaya development/updating wasn't very
> > rapid.
>
> It supports the current standard. People who make the complaint that
> it doesn't get rapid de
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11:42, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> > It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you
> > look at the top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards
> > compliant, and if you have 100% standards compli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:10:45AM -0400, lists1 wrote:
> It works heavily toward w3c standard compliant code (and if you look at the
> top 100 sites, I doubt 10% of them are 100% standards compliant, and if you
> have 100% standards compliant, you'l
On Monday 09 June 2003 14:03, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP
> machine and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there
> for Debian. Does any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 05:10:07PM -0400, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Bluefish looks intriguing. Has anyone
> ever used Amaya? I would think that it should be solid coming from w3.org.
Amaya works well. I use it whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:39:23PM +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
> Other than the venerable emacs? Quanta, Bluefish, Mozilla Composer.
If it doesn't pass the W3C's validator at http://validator.w3.org/,
it's not HTML. None of the ones you named do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:33:14PM -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> No, really. There aren't any real WYSIWYG-style web development tools
> for linux, not free, anyways.
Uhh, you must never bother looking at web standards when you're
creating p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:03:12PM -0400, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether.
Amaya's the only one you need. Standards compliant, too, so instead
of disgra
--- Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > -- Kevin
Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> (on Monday, 09 June 2003, 02:03 PM -0400):
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LA
Thus spake Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> > ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> > and was wondering what Open Source web desi
age-
> From: Clive Menzies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:01 PM
> To: Kevin Griffis
> Cc: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: Good Open Source Web Development software
>
>
> On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> > I would like to eventuall
On (09/06/03 14:03), Kevin Griffis wrote:
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there for
> Debian. Does anyone have
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:20:13 +0200, Kevin Griffis wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out the
-- Kevin Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Monday, 09 June 2003, 02:03 PM -0400):
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools ar
--- Kevin Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Greetings all,
>
> I would like to eventually do all my web development on my Linux laptop and
> ditch FrontPage altogether. I am planning to build a site on a LAMP machine
> and was wondering what Open Source web design tools are out there for
29 matches
Mail list logo
