On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:19:23 +1300, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> > If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> > gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
>
> What is this mail pertain
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:03:15AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz):
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> > > If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> > > gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or so
Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz):
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> > If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> > gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
>
> What is the context of this mail
Am Sonntag, den 11.10.2015, 20:45 +0300 schrieb moxalt:
> If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
>
ok, thank You, as far as i see gnome is working fine without installing
gnome-panel... I hav
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
What is this mail pertaining to?
Each mail in a thread should make at least some sense on its o
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
What is the context of this mail?
*Baffled!*
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will h
If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
On Tue, 08 May 2012 21:56:23 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> I wonder why is that gnome-shell fails. Is that okay for you?
>
> right now it is very ok for me. :)
>
> if i try to push gnome-shell to the most recent
> version it wants to remove evolution. i would rather leave my
Camaleón wrote:
>songbird wrote:
...
>> the fonts work correctly on startup and restarts
>> of Gnome Panel under fallback.
>
> I wonder why is that gnome-shell fails. Is that okay
> for you?
right now it is very ok for me. :)
if i try to push gnome-shell to the most recent
version it want
On Mon, 07 May 2012 17:27:53 -0400, songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
>> Camaleón wrote:
>> ...
>>> Let the updates do their work :-)
>>
>> thanks, but no change in the situation with
>> latest updates.
>
>
> as it turns out, the Gnome transition going on
> with updates to sid/wheezy crashed
songbird wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
> ...
>> Let the updates do their work :-)
>
> thanks, but no change in the situation with
> latest updates.
as it turns out, the Gnome transition going on
with updates to sid/wheezy crashed my new Gnome and
it retreated to running fallback instead.
the f
Camaleón wrote:
...
> Let the updates do their work :-)
thanks, but no change in the situation with
latest updates.
and yes, i have tried setting up new user
before and then i did again today to make sure
and the problem remains.
my guess is that you are right in that it
is probably graphi
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:31:14 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>> the xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.18.0-2 trying to switch
>>> to intel site downloaded version. too old... skip for now.
>>
>> The package seems up-to-date.
>
> *nods*
>
> today there are changes in the sid/testi
Camaleón wrote:
>songbird wrote:
>> Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> What VGA driver are you using? Although you firstly thought there is no
>>> relation between this and your UI problems, true is that there can be
>>> :-) (intel cards use to work smoothly with gnome-shell while ati/nvidia
>>> and t
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:55:49 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> What VGA driver are you using? Although you firstly thought there is no
>> relation between this and your UI problems, true is that there can be
>> :-) (intel cards use to work smoothly with gnome-shell while ati/nvid
Camaleón wrote:
...
> But in my case, restarting gnome-shell solves the issue so maybe is that
> you're facing a different problem then :-?
yes, i'm still digging into it. going to
be delayed for a while now. if i figure it
out i'll post a fix.
>> the gnome-panel up above is missing the w
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:51:13 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>> i'm running current unstable versions of gnome, gnome-panel,
>>> gnome-shell, up to date on graphics drivers, tried different kernels,
>>> tried creating new user, etc. all same result.
>>>
>>> the whole thing is blank
Camaleón wrote:
>songbird wrote:
>> what controls the display of the fonts in the gnome-panel when it first
>> starts up?
>
> Well, starting from gnome-shell, "mutter" is the window manager which
> relies in "clutter" as the graphical library to draw the GUI.
ok, thanks for the names. i can l
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:50:41 -0400, songbird wrote:
> what controls the display of the fonts in the gnome-panel when it first
> starts up?
Well, starting from gnome-shell, "mutter" is the window manager which
relies in "clutter" as the graphical library to draw the GUI.
> i'm running current
On 08/07/11 11:59 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:12:59 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
Booted into Gnome for the first time in a while today after fixing
youtube videos...and saw 100% of cpu time being taken up by gnome-panel,
metacity and X.
Killed the .gnome and .gnome2 directories
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:12:59 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Booted into Gnome for the first time in a while today after fixing
> youtube videos...and saw 100% of cpu time being taken up by gnome-panel,
> metacity and X.
> Killed the .gnome and .gnome2 directories but the result is the same. Is
>
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 07:24 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
(...)
>
> A quick test: drop/move the non-transparent icons anywhere in the panel
> but "notification-tray" to check if they keep transparency or still show
> with a solid background.
>
> > I'll have another look on Thursday, will post if I
On Tue, 04 May 2010 23:56:00 +0200, Steven wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> You can check if the icon being used is the correct one (the one with
>> alpha channel to get transparency).
> I don't think there's one without it in current installations.
A quick
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 13:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:30:53 +0200, Steven wrote:
>
> O.k. then let's assume the patch is already applied :-(
>
> > Still leaves me with this issue, unfortunatly.
>
> Yep. But that should not discourage you :-)
Your right, it shouldn't :) I'l
On Mon, 03 May 2010 21:30:53 +0200, Steven wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 19:07 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> AKAIK, Rhythmbox plugins got splitted from main package and now fall
>> into "rhythmbox-plugins". So if the upstream version with the patch on
>> "GtkStatusIcon" was included into Debian pack
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 19:07 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2010 20:29:17 +0200, Steven wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 15:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> ***
> >> gnome-panel: some application icons lost transparency in notification
> >> area http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
On Mon, 03 May 2010 20:29:17 +0200, Steven wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 15:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> ***
>> gnome-panel: some application icons lost transparency in notification
>> area http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551751 ***
>>
>> Anyway, check if the affected applicati
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 15:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:33:59 +0200, Steven wrote:
(...)
>
> There is an open bug, but the weird thing is that in your case it works
> in one computer and fails in the other :-?
>
> ***
> gnome-panel: some application icons lost transparency in
On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:33:59 +0200, Steven wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 14:17 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> Two easy tests:
>>
>> 1/ Create a new panel and drop there the "faulty" icons. Are they still
>> showed with a solid background?
> Creating a new panel with notification area keeps s
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 14:17 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 02 May 2010 15:40:28 +0200, Steven wrote:
>
> > I have Squeeze installed on both a laptop and a desktop, this only
> > occurs on the desktop.
>
> Are both computers using the same GNOME GTK theme?
It would seem so, both look the same ap
On Sun, 02 May 2010 15:40:28 +0200, Steven wrote:
> I have Squeeze installed on both a laptop and a desktop, this only
> occurs on the desktop.
Are both computers using the same GNOME GTK theme?
Are both computers running the same version of the applications involved
in this issue?
> In gnome,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 08:30:44PM +1100, Nick Croft wrote:
> Hi List
>
> After 6 months of preoccupation with another project, I decided to do
> a dist-upgrade when a couple of packages started showing signs of their age.
>
> All worked fine. It's nice to be up to date.
>
> In my main user, wh
Liam O'Toole wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:55:51 -0500
Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After a recent upgrade, dselect seems to have removed my
gnome-panel. I have gone back to
dselect and installed gnome-panel (2.14.2-1), but it does not appear
on my screen at bootup.
Without it, I c
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:55:51 -0500
Russ Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a recent upgrade, dselect seems to have removed my
> gnome-panel. I have gone back to
> dselect and installed gnome-panel (2.14.2-1), but it does not appear
> on my screen at bootup.
> Without it, I can't launch a ter
Hi again!
About my previous answer - you can use that ONLY if you are NOT root,
else your system locks.
A better way of doing this:
The script 10session-clean-startup I wrote before may contain:
PWD=`pwd`
( cd /tmp
for TMPFILE in `find . -xdev -user ${USER} -a \( -name "*${USER}*" -o
-name "
The solution for the problem you have:
When running, the Panel, ESD and other GNOME apps leave a state-info file in /tmp. You have to clean the /tmp files before you start the GNOME session, else GNOME 'thinks' some components are still active. You can do it this way:
1. Create a /etc/X11/Xse
El mar, 06-09-2005 a las 10:09 +0700, Ms Linuz escribió:
> I had this problem and solved by editing my gnome2 session file.
> $home/.gnome2/session
> I found two entries of gnome-panel there and delete one ( backup first
> of course )
> Make sure you delete all line which start with the same numbe
vasaka wrote:
> David Purton wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:06:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Preston,
>>>
>>> I am having the same problem. Did you find a solution for this issue
>>> yet?
>>>
>>>
>>>
After a recent update (I am running Unstable) I receive an e
David Purton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:06:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Preston,
I am having the same problem. Did you find a solution for this issue yet?
After a recent update (I am running Unstable) I receive an error message
at GNOME startup that states that ther
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:06:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Preston,
>
> I am having the same problem. Did you find a solution for this issue yet?
>
> >After a recent update (I am running Unstable) I receive an error message
> >at GNOME startup that states that there is already a pane
Hi Preston,
I am having the same problem. Did you find a solution for this issue yet?
Harry
--On Thursday, September 01, 2005 09:43:11 AM -0500 Preston Boyington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After a recent update (I am running Unstable) I receive an error message
at GNOME startup that states
Paolo Ornati wrote:
Look here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309506
I report also the quick workaround:
"Killing smproxy in the Desktop->Preferences->sessions menu,
and then saving my session seems to be a usable work-around"
:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309506
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"apt-get remove x-common" will do the trick.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/07/05 13:35, wrote:
I was just moving my menu panel to the right-hand side and I was
trying to adjust its width (or height as it would have been while on
the bottom side).
There is a dialog box with a increment control to set the value, and
while I was scrolling this up,
Jochen Schulz wrote, on 06/14/05 14:31:
Cliff Flood:
Is there anything I can do to fix it and restore my nicely configured,
efficient Gnome working environment? :)
Try 'apt-get -f install' without any further arguments. If that fails, I
would try to remove suspicious packages and reinstall t
Cliff Flood:
>
> Is there anything I can do to fix it and restore my nicely configured,
> efficient Gnome working environment? :)
Try 'apt-get -f install' without any further arguments. If that fails, I
would try to remove suspicious packages and reinstall them.
J.
--
I wish I was gay.
[Agree
James Miller wrote, on 06/09/05 13:43:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-panel: Depends: libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libecal6 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libedataserver3 (>
On 6/11/05, Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> > [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> > (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > PS A newly-discovered ancient C
James Miller wrote:
> mymachine:/home/user# apt-get -f install gnome-panel
> It all woiks!
Nyuk nyuk nyuk. Yea!
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plets_2.8.2-3_i386.deb) ...
> Setting up gnome-applets (2.8.2-3) ...
>
> mymachine:/home/user#
>
> It all woiks! Just like before the infamous dist-upgrade!
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tom wrote:
>
>> [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
>>(Re: gnome-pane
.)
Unpacking gnome-applets (from .../gnome-applets_2.8.2-3_i386.deb) ...
Setting up gnome-applets (2.8.2-3) ...
mymachine:/home/user#
It all woiks! Just like before the infamous dist-upgrade!
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tom wrote:
[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
(Re: gnome-panel .. gone
Marc Wilson wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
>
>
>>[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
>> (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>
>>
>>>PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: wh
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> > wise man running unstable does not
[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
(Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> wise man running unstable does not dist-upgrade hastily :)
Or they just read up on what apt says it'll do,
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Mike Ward wrote:
If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
this is it.
/me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
This amounts to more or less and inconvenience for me.
%% Mike Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mw> If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and
mw> take it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely
mw> for me, this is it.
APT can't help you with bugs in the software or packaging. If you don't
want an "unstable
On Thursday 09 of June 2005 18:19, Mike Ward wrote:
> If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
> it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
> this is it.
>
> /me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
>
> Additionally, I've noticed my n
If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
this is it.
/me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
Additionally, I've noticed my non-us.debian.org apt source is
returning 404's on updating. I h
The same thing happened top me testerday on 'Debian Unstable' after
updating which Synaptic. I have not had the time to do anything about it
yet, but I imagine there is some configuration file that needs tweeking.
alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr.
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:43 -0500, James Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
>
> > Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
> > lady's wish to send an urgent
> > email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
> > 'Gnome-session',
>
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
lady's wish to send an urgent
email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
'Gnome-session',
choosing the latter out of long-term habit. I then found gnome-panels
to b
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
lady's wish to send an urgent
email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
'Gnome-session',
choosing the latter out of long-term habit. I then found gnome-panels
to b
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:52:12AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> alan bonard wrote:
>
> >Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
> >or just me ?
>
> I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
> unstable. I'd avoid using unstable for machi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Dowland wrote:
> alan bonard wrote:
>
>> Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
>> or just me ?
>
>
> I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
> unstable. I'd avoid using unstable fo
alan bonard wrote:
Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
or just me ?
I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
unstable. I'd avoid using unstable for machines that you need to work at
short notice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700, Ian Thomas wrote:
> $ panel &
I didn't think of trying to start the panel manually.
> No panel starts. I haven't found any information
> about how to fix this problem from the following
> sources:
I'm unable to get the panel to start automatically using Saw
--- Jules Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:19:38 +0200, Andrea
> Vettorello wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> [GNOME panel doesn't start using Sawfish WM]
> >>
> > Have you deleted the ~/.sawfi
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:19:38 +0200, Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [GNOME panel doesn't start using Sawfish WM]
>>
> Have you deleted the ~/.sawfish dir too, or at least the
> ~/.sawfish/sessions dir?
I can conf
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Final update:
>
> I deleted every file in my home directory that could
> possibly be related to gnome, leaving only the
> following config files:
>
> .bash_profile, .bashrc, .emacs, .fetchmailrc,
> .pr
--- Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- Andrea Vettorello
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > If you open an xterm (or g
--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Andrea Vettorello
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and launch
> the
> > > "panel &" command,
> > > the panel
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and launch the
> > "panel &" command,
> > the panel start?
>
> $ panel &
>
> GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 1
--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and launch the
> "panel &" command,
> the panel start?
$ panel &
GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 1348
(g_strsplit): assertion `string != NULL' failed.
No panel starts. I haven't found any informat
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:36:01 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- Andrea VeVettorelloanandreaevettorellomgmailom>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 28 SeSep004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> > Thomas
> > > wrote:
> > > > A few days ag
--- Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Andrea VeVettorelloanandreaevettorellomgmailom>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 28 SeSep004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> > wrote:
> > > A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDGDMnd
> > the
> > > gnome panel failed to start up. That left me
> w
--- Andrea VeVettorelloanandreaevettorellomgmailom>
wrote:
> On Tue, 28 SeSep004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
> wrote:
> > A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDGDMnd
> the
> > gnome panel failed to start up. That left me with
> > just sasawfishunning. This is usable but I would
> like
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDM and the
> gnome panel failed to start up. That left me with
> just sawfish running. This is usable but I would like
> the Gnome panel back for convenience sake. I have
>
Hi,
Unfortunately I am having the same problems. I was on holiday for 3 weeks,
so wasn't able to get this done earlier.
I searched the archives, and found the link mentioned. Unfortunately it is
dead by now :(. I did some more googling but couldn't find anything
else...
Anyone having a copy of x
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:35:21 +0300 (EEST)
George Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> beside all this i can't see the icons in their normal shape. i only see
> something like a paper
Search the archives; this has been discussed here in the past few weeks.
It basically boils down to a missing depen
hi i have the same problem.
beside all this i can't see the icons in their normal shape. i only see
something like a paper
George Roman
Technical Support
RDS Timisoara Branch - Network Operations Center
Tel: +4 0356 400 200
Tel: +4 0256 200 033
Fax: +4 0256 294 510
www.rdsnet.ro
On Fre, 2004-03-05 at 12:46, Michael Graham wrote:
> Christian wrote:
> > Without apparent reason, the clock applet has vanished from my panel.
> > All attempts to add it were in vain.
> > The fun part: if I run the panel from xterm (killall gnome-panel &&
> > gnome-panel) the clock is back.
> Hav
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:26:18 +0100
Christian Schnobrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This behaviour seems very strange to me. Any ideas apart from burning
> incense sticks and singing mantras?
I don't have a direct answer for you -- I use GNOME, but I've never
run into something like that. But
Christian wrote:
> Without apparent reason, the clock applet has vanished from my panel.
> All attempts to add it were in vain.
> The fun part: if I run the panel from xterm (killall gnome-panel &&
> gnome-panel) the clock is back. Actually, several clocks... presumably
> these are the result of me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manuel Bilderbeek sent the following message Today:
MB> What is the problem? Are there very little applets available because no
MB> one is porting the old 1.4 applets to 2.x?
MB>
MB> Is this going to be fixed?
MB> Did I find bugs?
MB> Is it a mat
I created a new session and got my panel back. So I guess this solves
the problem. But it was true, that the diskusage_applet was the problem.
Just in case anyone else has the same problem.
Johan Ehnberg wrote:
Hi!
What can I do when my gnome (1.4 as in woody) panel won't load anymore.
I get my
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 02:23, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have you had any success in running the Panel via VNC?
If you're running VNC in the simple way, putting "gnome-session" into
the xstartup script in ~/.vnc should give your your full GNOME session
when you connect with the VNC viewer.
Regards
On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 10:40, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> I've got a dual-head setup using Xinerama. A while ago I noticed that
> the gnome stuff was upgraded and this morning when I logged in for the
> first time since that upgrade my gnome panel no longer stretches
> across both monitors. Does anyone k
on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:41:36AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 21:25:40 +1100, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> >after almost a year of use I find that the fonts on my Gnome panels and
> >sub-menus has been replaced by rectangles made of dots.
>
> Yes. See
Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> after almost a year of use I find that the fonts on
> my Gnome panels and sub-menus has been replaced by
> rectangles made of dots. The rest of the OS appears
> to be operating normally.
>
> Has anyone come across this ... and knows how to
> fix it ?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 21:25:40 +1100, Adam Bogacki wrote:
>after almost a year of use I find that the fonts on my Gnome panels and
>sub-menus has been replaced by rectangles made of dots.
Yes. See http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/23/ or search for
"rectangle, square" in the archives for de
Thus spake Kris Huber:
> I did an install of the potato kernel and selected packages. I chose
> enlightenment and gnome under X11, which I've used before under kernel 2.4.
> My version of gnome is a bit older (at least control panel is). I'm puzzled
> why I don't have a panel across the bottom of
Jim McCloskey wrote:-
> It works well for me.
>
> I'm running X 4.0.3 from testing, and version 0.99 of sawfish from
> testing. Version 1.0.55 of gnome-panel, also from testing,
Hi Jim,
It's a little weird. If I start panel in my .xsession before sawfish,
everything is snappy like you'd expec
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:33:41PM +0200, Johnny Ernst Nielsen wrote:
[snip]
> I suspect that the sluggishness of your setup comes from 2 sawfish
> biting at eachother.
> - The one you started manually
> - The one gnome-session starts
>
> They probably don't like eachother.
I'd think at least one
|> I don't have gnome-session installed at all. I was just running
|> panel from an rxvt window.
Neil:
I have a very similar setup. I wanted the panel functionality without
the whole GNOME beast. I haven't noticed the sluggishness you report,
though. I start the panel in .xinitrc:
---
First, thanks to Johnny and Stephan.
> You can start Gnome in two ways in your .xsession:
>
> start the panel
> start a windowmanager
>
> This will work, but will not be session managed.
>
> The smarter way is:
>
> gnome-session
>
> Gnome-session (and do NOT start a window manager manually be
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Thus spake Neil Booth:
> > I installed sawfish about 3 wks ago, and have installed a couple of
> > revisions of gnome panel since then. However, if I bring up panel
> > after starting sawfish, dragging a window becomes jerky and slow. I
> > don't remembe
Thus spake Neil Booth:
> I installed sawfish about 3 wks ago, and have installed a couple of
> revisions of gnome panel since then. However, if I bring up panel
> after starting sawfish, dragging a window becomes jerky and slow. I
> don't remember this behaviour in WindowMaker. Somtimes, but not
Richard Black wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have my gnome panel set to auto-hide, which would be great except that
> when I go to raise it, it raises _under_ other windows (making it a bit
> tricky to actually use it :-)).
>
> Does anyone know how to set it so that it raises on top? I am using
> saw
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Richard Black wrote:
Using woody/helix/sawfish:
Settings:Desktop:Panel:Miscellaneous:
Unselect: Keep panel below windows
> I have my gnome panel set to auto-hide, which would be great except that
> when I go to raise it, it raises _under_ other windows (making it a bit
> tr
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
