Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
Charles Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out > the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were > needed in slink and not potato I don't know. It's a kernel issue. Linux 2.2.x automatically adds

Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-21 Thread Bryan Scaringe
Yep. Looks like the 2.2.x series is smart enought not to need them. Course, I still include them for completion's sake. Bryan On 20-Oct-99 Colin Marquardt wrote: > * Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out >> t

Re: Fw: SIOCADDRT

1999-10-20 Thread Colin Marquardt
* Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out > the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were > needed in slink and not potato I don't know. --^^^-^^-- --ke