Yep. Looks like the 2.2.x series is smart enought not to need them. Course, I still include them for completion's sake.
Bryan On 20-Oct-99 Colin Marquardt wrote: > * Charles Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The way we solved the SIOCADDRT problem (in potato) was to just comment out >> the route add lines. Apparently they are not needed. Although why they were >> needed in slink and not potato I don't know. > --^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-----^^^^^^^^^^-------------- > --kernel 2.0.x--------kernel 2.2.x------------ > > -- > Colin Marquardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > /dev/null
