Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Peter Daum
s. keeling wrote: Peter Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: # dpkg -l fortune*|grep ii ii fortune-mod1.99.1-3.1 provides fortune cookies on demand ii fortunes 1.99.1-3.1 Data files containing fortune cookies ii fortunes-min 1.99.1-3.1 Data files containing fortune cookies

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread s. keeling
Peter Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > # dpkg -l fortune*|grep ii > ii fortune-mod1.99.1-3.1 provides fortune cookies on demand > ii fortunes 1.99.1-3.1 Data files containing fortune cookies > ii fortunes-min 1.99.1-3.1 Data files containing fortune cookies (0) phreaque

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Allums
Peter Daum wrote: Mark Allums wrote: Peter Daum wrote: certainly not the most critical problem, but at least on my system (mainly Etch, I also tried the fortune package from Lenny) doesn't work. when I trace it, I can see that it reads a bunch of fortue data files but that is obviously just

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Peter Daum
Mark Allums wrote: Peter Daum wrote: certainly not the most critical problem, but at least on my system (mainly Etch, I also tried the fortune package from Lenny) doesn't work. when I trace it, I can see that it reads a bunch of fortue data files but that is obviously just for its own pleasur

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Allums
Peter Daum wrote: certainly not the most critical problem, but at least on my system (mainly Etch, I also tried the fortune package from Lenny) doesn't work. when I trace it, I can see that it reads a bunch of fortue data files but that is obviously just for its own pleasure - it just silently

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Allums
Peter Daum wrote: certainly not the most critical problem, but at least on my system (mainly Etch, I also tried the fortune package from Lenny) doesn't work. when I trace it, I can see that it reads a bunch of fortue data files but that is obviously just for its own pleasure - it just silently

Re: fortune not working

2008-07-30 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Peter Daum wrote: > certainly not the most critical problem, but at least on my system > (mainly Etch, > I also tried the fortune package from Lenny) doesn't work. when I trace > it, I > can see that it reads a bunch of fortue data files but that is obviously > just > for its own pleasure - it just

Re: Fortune file!

2006-07-08 Thread John Hasler
Jude DaShiell writes: > Linux has its problems with packet sniffers certainly; I've got the logs > to prove it. Would you please explain what you mean by this? -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fortune file!

2006-07-08 Thread Jude DaShiell
Linux has its problems with packet sniffers certainly; I've got the logs to prove it. I don't know that there's any solution to this problem either. You can reinstall the hacked software but without additional protection of the system the dhcp software just gets hacked again as soon as the or

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-30 Thread David E. Fox
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:54:14 -0700 Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the > universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out > shopping. I wonder how many of us on this list are in the immediate local? Not m

Beaverton Linux Group (WAS: Re: Fortune file!)

2006-04-29 Thread Marc Shapiro
Michael M. wrote: Beaverton: http://www.bluegroup.org/ (link is dead, at least for me, but I'm pretty sure the group is still active) This site didn't work before, but it is, now. - Marc Shapiro No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. What?! Look, somebody's got to

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-26 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Michael M. wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:19:02PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > >>On Monday 24 April 2006 17:54, Marc Shapiro wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the > >>>un

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-25 Thread Michael M.
Kevin Mark wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:19:02PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Monday 24 April 2006 17:54, Marc Shapiro wrote: I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out shopping. I wonder how

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-25 Thread Michael M.
Paul Johnson wrote: On Monday 24 April 2006 17:54, Marc Shapiro wrote: I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out shopping. I wonder how many of us on this list are in the immediate local? I don't

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:19:02PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Monday 24 April 2006 17:54, Marc Shapiro wrote: > > > I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the > > universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out > > shopping. I wonder how many of us on

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Monday 24 April 2006 17:54, Marc Shapiro wrote: > I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the > universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out > shopping. I wonder how many of us on this list are in the immediate local? I don't know. It would be intere

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Kelly Clowers
On 4/24/06, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I, also, live in Aloha, only about 3 miles from the 'center of the > universe'. I frequently pass within site of OSDL when I am out > shopping. I wonder how many of us on this list are in the immediate local? > > -- > Marc Shapiro I feel t

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Raquel Rice
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:34:05 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 18:21 -0700, Raquel Rice wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:54:14 -0700 > > Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Michael M. wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > I grew up in Hillsboro several

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 18:21 -0700, Raquel Rice wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:54:14 -0700 > Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Michael M. wrote: > > [snip] > > I grew up in Hillsboro several years ago. I'm going back for our > (mumble-mumble)-year high school reunion in August. I a

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Raquel Rice
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:54:14 -0700 Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael M. wrote: > > > > > Well, my mom asked me what a "blog" was a few months ago because > > she heard some newsmodels talking about blogs on TV. So I > > guess these things can filter down eventually. But she li

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Marc Shapiro
Michael M. wrote: Well, my mom asked me what a "blog" was a few months ago because she heard some newsmodels talking about blogs on TV. So I guess these things can filter down eventually. But she lived in Hillsboro, one town west of Beaverton, and I daresay she had not heard of Linux. My

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Paul Johnson
On Monday 24 April 2006 15:42, Michael M. wrote: > Now Nike and Intel, on the other hand ... everyone here knows them! Now if both companies were forced to hire people locally instead of hiring people from out of state or on H1B's, we would be getting somewhere... -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (

Re: Fortune file!

2006-04-24 Thread Michael M.
Paul Johnson wrote: On Saturday 22 April 2006 21:09, Michael M. wrote: Aunt Matilda is only vaguely aware of what an operating system is, and has no idea that any alternatives exist. Give Aunt Matilda some credit. Odds are if she watches Star Trek or pays any attention to the evenin

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-06-01 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 23:38 -0400, Kevin Mark a écrit : > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:15:52PM +0200, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 16:09 +0200, Aurélien Campéas a écrit : > > [...] > > > a lot of crap here, but look at the last stat64 syscalls near the end : > > > it looks like

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:15:52PM +0200, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 16:09 +0200, Aurélien Campéas a écrit : > [...] > > a lot of crap here, but look at the last stat64 syscalls near the end : > > it looks like a bug related to localisation (fortune tries to open a > > file na

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 16:09 +0200, Aurélien Campéas a écrit : [...] > a lot of crap here, but look at the last stat64 syscalls near the end : > it looks like a bug related to localisation (fortune tries to open a > file named "fr_FR.UTF ..." instead of a real file). Indeed for this > system I had

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 14:52 +0100, Lee Braiden a écrit : > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:41, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > if (stat(file, &staat) == 0) > > default: > > perror("fortune: bad juju in is_existant"); > > exit(1); > > Do someone knows a tool to expose the call graph o

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Lee Braiden
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:41, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > if (stat(file, &staat) == 0) > default: > perror("fortune: bad juju in is_existant"); > exit(1); > Do someone knows a tool to expose the call graph of a C program ? The easiest way might be to run it through stra

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 19:54 +0700, Dave Patterson a écrit : > > > > I consider fortune to be the most important unix app ever written > > So do I (well, at least one of the most). Let us know what you did to fix it. > The crappy string is in fortune.c (stupid programmers !!) : /* * is_exist

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Dave Patterson
> > I consider fortune to be the most important unix app ever written So do I (well, at least one of the most). Let us know what you did to fix it. -- Regards, Dave try again signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 11:59 +0100, Lee Braiden a écrit : > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 11:50, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fortune > > > > fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied > > It's a real error. > > > > It is not corrected even by purging/reinstalling the pack

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Lee Braiden
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 11:50, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fortune > > > fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied > It's a real error. > > It is not corrected even by purging/reinstalling the package. Ahh. Are you in the games group? If not, that's probably why.

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Camp=E9as?=
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 10:46 +0100, Lee Braiden a écrit : > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 10:42, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > I realize that since a few days, fortune does not work any more. Like > > this: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fortune > > fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied > > Are

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Mark Janssen
On 5/31/05, Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2005 10:42, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fortune > > fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied > > Are you getting that continuously, every time you run it? Because fortune > does throw out "funny

Re: fortune bug ?

2005-05-31 Thread Lee Braiden
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 10:42, Aurélien Campéas wrote: > I realize that since a few days, fortune does not work any more. Like > this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fortune > fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied Are you getting that continuously, every time you run it? Because fortune d

Re: Fortune and KMail

2003-09-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 20:29:02 +0200, Mark Annandale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Guys > > Could someone explain to me how to add 'fortune' onto the end of my > signature file. My signature is obtained from 'output of command > cat > sig', however adding && fortu

Re: fortune: "fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied"

2001-04-03 Thread Mario Vukelic
On 31 Mar 2001 12:24:02 -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Mario Vukelic wrote: > > I can't run fortune anymore: (...) > > Well according to the source this means that a stat() of some file did > not return true, and the errno was not ENOENT or ENOTDIR. stat(2) lists > some other possible error codes incl

Re: fortune: "fortune: bad juju in is_existant: Permission denied"

2001-03-31 Thread Joey Hess
Mario Vukelic wrote: > I can't run fortune anymore: It's been like that for some weeks in > woody, but I guess it's happened only to me, since there are no > references to "juju" in the mailing list archive. If I run fortune on > the cmd line, I get the error given in this mail's subject, which isn

Re: fortune problems?

1999-10-14 Thread Dan Everton
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Ingo Reimann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:01:41PM +1000, Dan Everton wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:02:44PM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: > > > For some reason, when I run fortune I get this message: > > > > > > fortune: no place to put residual probability (0%) > >

Re: fortune problems?

1999-10-14 Thread Ingo Reimann
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:01:41PM +1000, Dan Everton wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:02:44PM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: > > For some reason, when I run fortune I get this message: > > > > fortune: no place to put residual probability (0%) > > > > This happened after I ran the newest wine whic

Re: fortune problems?

1999-10-14 Thread Dan Everton
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:02:44PM -0500, Robert Rati wrote: > For some reason, when I run fortune I get this message: > > fortune: no place to put residual probability (0%) > > This happened after I ran the newest wine which caused a kernel panic. I > had to do a hard reboot to get the syatem b

Re: Fortune

1997-10-15 Thread Jameson Burt
I like to display "fortune" or the "dhammapada" in my x-window at login, so I have in ~/.xsession xmessage -center "`dp`" & In fact, I like it so much that I generate a new dhammapada every 10 minutes on an X-window in the fourth quadrant: xterm -T dhammapada -geometry +1024+11

Re: Fortune

1997-10-10 Thread Will Lowe
On Fri, 10 Oct 1997, Heiko Heijenga wrote: > Question: How do I show a fortune when I log in (with the prog. Fortune). you could just put "fortune" as the last statement in your bash_profile. Will [EMAIL PRO