On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:34:43PM -, marc wrote:
> said...
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -, marc wrote:
> >
> > > I have a share that is 3Tb. More practically, though, when a client
> > > works here, connects to the network and presents a share, he would be
> > > mightily peeved
Lars said...
> >I have a mixed XP and Linux network here
> And you never have time-outs or similar?
Very rarely. Usually, the problem boils down to a Windows prog getting
its knickers in a twist. Restarting the app fixes the problem. However,
if we just leave the network alone, the it just wor
said...
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -, marc wrote:
>
> > I have a share that is 3Tb. More practically, though, when a client
> > works here, connects to the network and presents a share, he would be
> > mightily peeved for all of its data to spread itself across the local
> > univers
said...
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:45AM -, marc wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry to say it, but Linux filesharing is really not where it should
> > > be
> >
> > I agree.
> >
> > > and I think there is no established system allowing automatic
> > > discovery (other than Samba).
> >
> > Which is p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -, marc wrote:
I have a share that is 3Tb. More practically, though, when a client
works here, connects to the network and presents a share, he would be
mightily peeved for all of its data to spread itself across the local
universe
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:45AM -, marc wrote:
>
> > Sorry to say it, but Linux filesharing is really not where it should
> > be
>
> I agree.
>
> > and I think there is no established system allowing automatic
> > discovery (other than Samba).
>
> Which is probably the best solution, in t
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -, marc wrote:
> I have a share that is 3Tb. More practically, though, when a client
> works here, connects to the network and presents a share, he would be
> mightily peeved for all of its data to spread itself across the local
> universe. In fact, it would
Thanks for answers, though i've preferred a more direct answer, do that
and that. But "the freedom" to choose, gives alot of choices.. :-)
General it's a small LAN (max 10 Hosts, a couple laptops). Mostly
text-docs,photos, small files from a main fileserver, but i would like
to have users & gro
said...
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Lars wrote:
>
> > I hate to said it/use this expression, but i'm looking for a simple MS
> > peer-to-peer/small AD, just in Linux. I properly missed something...
>
> "MS peer-to-peer/small AD" is greek to me. Can you be more specific
> about y
said...
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:19:04PM +0100, Guido Heumann wrote:
>
> > I've seen this question coming up before, and I'm interested in this
> > as well. It really seems to me that the solutions you mentioned are
> > the only "mature" ways for linux-to-linux filesharing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linux NFS is
pretty unreliable in my experience, randomly failing in spite of
network connectivity every couple months or so -- but I haven't used
it seriously in a while (since 2.4.10 or so maybe), and it may have
improved. (I've waited for some improvement since 2.0.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:19:04PM +0100, Guido Heumann wrote:
> I've seen this question coming up before, and I'm interested in this
> as well. It really seems to me that the solutions you mentioned are
> the only "mature" ways for linux-to-linux filesharing.
>
> I also know
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Lars wrote:
> Hey
>
> I'm running a small LAN and is a bit lost in the question regarding a
> simple filesharing on a small LAN...
> NFS: I don't get it. If anyone plugs into the lan and have a
> root-account they are on the share.
NFS requires each fi
Lars said...
> Hey
>
> I'm running a small LAN and is a bit lost in the question regarding a
> simple filesharing on a small LAN...
> NFS: I don't get it. If anyone plugs into the lan and have a
> root-account they are on the share.
> SMB: Works sometimes with linux, but often time-out with
>
El Lunes, 28 de Noviembre de 2005 22:22, Lars escribió:
> Hey
>
> I'm running a small LAN and is a bit lost in the question regarding a
> simple filesharing on a small LAN...
> NFS: I don't get it. If anyone plugs into the lan and have a
> root-account they are on the share.
You can make a local v
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Lars wrote:
> Hey
>
> I'm running a small LAN and is a bit lost in the question regarding a
> simple filesharing on a small LAN...
> NFS: I don't get it. If anyone plugs into the lan and have a
> root-account they are on the share.
No, actually the roo
Am Montag, 28. November 2005 22:22 schrieb Lars:
> Hey
>
> I'm running a small LAN and is a bit lost in the question regarding a
> simple filesharing on a small LAN...
> NFS: I don't get it. If anyone plugs into the lan and have a
> root-account they are on the share.
> SMB: Works sometimes with l
17 matches
Mail list logo
