On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:19:04PM +0100, Guido Heumann wrote: > I've seen this question coming up before, and I'm interested in this > as well. It really seems to me that the solutions you mentioned are > the only "mature" ways for linux-to-linux filesharing. > > I also know of the lufs utilities, which can mount a remote > filesystem via ssh or ftp. In my experience ssh works well, but lufs > is described as experimental quality in the readme, so obviously one > should not rely on it. > > Are there really no other reliable solutions? I hope I missed > something too...
Coda is at least mature enough for the MIT university network and the stock Linux kernel, if that means anything. Personally, I would recommend 'unison' as a way to avoid filesystem sharing altogether. (Unison requires a mirrored copy of the shared data on every client, and just keeps them all in sync). Also, AFS is an improved derivative of Coda which I think is still in a more experimental stage, but may be worth a try. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
