Re: Editor survival [Was: Recommended editor for novice programmers?]

2017-09-09 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 04:17:50PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 03:19:49 (+0100), Nick Boyce wrote: > > You're absolutely right. I have sat next to seasoned vi users watching in > > awe as their fingers flew entering weird totally non-intuitive commands (to > > me) and achi

Re: Editor survival [Was: Recommended editor for novice programmers?]

2017-09-08 Thread David Wright
On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 03:19:49 (+0100), Nick Boyce wrote: > You're absolutely right. I have sat next to seasoned vi users watching in > awe as their fingers flew entering weird totally non-intuitive commands (to > me) and achieving great edits in next to no time. Other colleagues lived > insid

Re: Editor survival [Was: Recommended editor for novice programmers?]

2017-09-08 Thread Jude DaShiell
If you are torn between emacs and vi, it's probably because you haven't run eval-mode inside emacs. On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Nick Boyce wrote: Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:19:49 From: Nick Boyce To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Editor survival [Was: Recommended editor

Re: Editor survival [Was: Recommended editor for novice programmers?]

2017-09-07 Thread Nick Boyce
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:08:15 +1000 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 06.09.17 05:31, Nick Boyce wrote: [...] > > [Joe is] one of the first things I install on any Linux > > or *BSD system. > > In my decades of leading software teams, one thing I did not do is ask > "What editor do you use?", even in

Re: editor to remove noise (wind and wave) from sound file

2006-09-02 Thread Ric Otte
Thanks for the suggestions. I'm playing with the filters in audacity and rezound; they seem to help a bit, but I still haven't been able to make the voices understandable. If anyone is interested, I placed a 4 second sample of the voices at http://people.ucsc.edu/~otte/sound.test.aiff Thanks for

Re: editor to remove noise (wind and wave) from sound file

2006-09-02 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
Pure Data is great for stuff like this, but it is a lot to learn- you'd have to assemble the application yourself. If you expect your first time editing a sound file to be your last time, it's probably not what you want. A parametric equalizer would be an intuitive way that might help. I'm in W

Re: editor to remove noise (wind and wave) from sound file

2006-09-01 Thread Micha Feigin
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:01:14 -0700 Ric Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a recording of a wedding at a beach, but it is very difficult > to make out the words because of the noise due to the waves and wind. > I am looking for suggestions about how to begin editing the file to > remo

Re: Emacs on vt420 (was: Re: EDITOR)

2001-07-20 Thread Stephen Rueger
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:47:44AM -0500, Charles Sebold wrote: > On 29 Tammuz 5761, Stephen Rueger wrote: > > > Ack. Since I installed an old DEC VT420, which doesn't like emacs, I'm > > forced to use vi instead, although I don't want to :-) > > Details? I have used it on vt420's. I usually ha

Emacs on vt420 (was: Re: EDITOR)

2001-07-20 Thread Charles Sebold
On 29 Tammuz 5761, Stephen Rueger wrote: > Ack. Since I installed an old DEC VT420, which doesn't like emacs, I'm > forced to use vi instead, although I don't want to :-) Details? I have used it on vt420's. I usually have to do this in .emacs, though: (enable-flow-control-on "vt420") ; or what

Re: EDITOR

2001-07-20 Thread Mark Jaroski
Henk Janssen wrote: > I'm sorry if I appear to be a nitwit; but I'm rather fond of AE. Now I have > this itsipitsy problem (so do you now by the way). My Balsa broke. As a > result to that I've looked into MUTT as it goes around here on a regular > basis... But I have a HUGE problem with VI(M) as

Re: EDITOR

2001-07-20 Thread Ian
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Henk Janssen wrote: > From: "Guy Geens" > > > > > It's very hard to be a Linux user and avoid vi completely. :) > > I'm sorry if I appear to be a nitwit; but I'm rather fond of AE. Now I have > this itsipitsy problem (so do you now by the way). My Balsa b

Re: EDITOR

2001-07-20 Thread Stephen Rueger
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:21:38PM +0200, Henk Janssen wrote: > From: "Guy Geens" > > > > > It's very hard to be a Linux user and avoid vi completely. :) Ack. Since I installed an old DEC VT420, which doesn't like emacs, I'm forced to use vi instead, although I don't want to :-) > I'm sorry if

Re: EDITOR

2001-07-20 Thread Michael Perry
Quoting Henk Janssen on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:21:38PM +0200: > From: "Guy Geens" > > > > > It's very hard to be a Linux user and avoid vi completely. :) > > I'm sorry if I appear to be a nitwit; but I'm rather fond of AE. Now I have > this itsipitsy problem (so do you now by the way). My Balsa

Re: EDITOR

2001-07-20 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 17:21:38 +0200, Henk Janssen wrote: > As a result to that I've looked into MUTT as it goes around here on a > regular basis... But I have a HUGE problem with VI(M) as it is to much, > just like emacs. Is there an alternative? Quoting the mutt manual: 6.3.39. edit