Threaded to the OP, rather than a private message.
On Sun 11 Dec 2022 at 18:56:24 (-0600), Greg Marks wrote:
> Dear David,
Thanks, but please keep replies on list so others can see
solutions or join in with suggestions.
Rather than appending a piece of free-standing text to the
rest of the email
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 20:45:37 (-0500), pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100
> David wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks
> > > wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100
David wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks
> > wrote:
[snip]
>
> > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or
> > suggest this treatment.
>
> Here's a reference describing 'mb
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks wrote:
> > In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line
> > beginning with the word "From"; the sendmail program prefixed the
> > line with the character ">" and a space (evidently interpreting
>
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 08:24:05 (+0200), Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote:
> >
> > I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a
> > script containing the command
> >
> >/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file
> > Is there a way to tell
I remember some e-mail programs automatically add an extra space in
front of a From in the message body if any line starts with From.
Probably Thunderbird is one of them.
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Technically, it's th
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com
> wrote:
> > You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in
> > "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The
> > delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word
> > "From".
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
[...]
> Technically, it's the 5-character sequence "From " (including the space)
> that matters in mbox formats. If you begin a line with "Fromage" [...]
I thusly propose to drop the '>' escaping of "From" and change every From
at a
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in
> "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The
> delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word
> "From".
Technically
Hi,
pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> [...] any other line which starts with "From" must
> be "armored". And the way you do that is to precede it with "> ".
> I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or
> suggest this treatment.
It does not look like being fully specified by a
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a
> script containing the command
>
>/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file
>
> In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line
> beginning with the word "F
* 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote:
> Is there a way to tell the Postfix sendmail command not to alter any
> such lines ["From" lines] in the body of the message?
I can't answer your actual question but I think Postfix and other
"sendmails" do the right thing. In my opinion you shouldn'
On 2018-05-12 09:18 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2018, Gary Dale wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:30:26
From: Gary Dale
Reply-To: g...@extremeground.com
To: debian users
Subject: e-mail addresses not being redone
Resent-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 21:30:56 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debia
On Monday 02 October 2017 06:39:00 Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:26:08AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 02 October 2017 03:00:28 Reco wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> > > > This is the second time I've tried to send t
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:26:08AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 02 October 2017 03:00:28 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> > > This is the second time I've tried to send this. The first one just
> > > disappeared to the bit bu
Mike McCarty wrote:
[...] she wants to
import her e-mail, and her address book. We poked around with that
for a while, and found what we take to be her address book (in
~/.thunderbird/.default/abook.mab, but evoloution seems
unable to read/understand that. Nor does it seem to be able to
import he
Mike McCarty wrote:
Dave Patterson wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-26 09:05:42 -0500]:
Yeah, I shoulda mentioned that those had both been checked. I've sent
her an e-mail asking for what (if any) error messages she gets, but
I'm going to give her a phone call, as well.
She
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Dave Patterson wrote:
>> * Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-26
>> 09:05:42 -0500]:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yeah, I shoulda mentioned that those had both been checked.
>>> I've sent her an e-mail asking for what (if any) error
>>>
Dave Patterson wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-26 09:05:42 -0500]:
Yeah, I shoulda mentioned that those had both been checked. I've sent
her an e-mail asking for what (if any) error messages she gets, but
I'm going to give her a phone call, as well.
Is she on a dialup?
Dave Patterson wrote:
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-26 09:05:42 -0500]:
Yeah, I shoulda mentioned that those had both been checked. I've sent
her an e-mail asking for what (if any) error messages she gets, but
I'm going to give her a phone call, as well.
Is she on a dialup?
* Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-26 09:05:42 -0500]:
>
> Yeah, I shoulda mentioned that those had both been checked. I've sent
> her an e-mail asking for what (if any) error messages she gets, but
> I'm going to give her a phone call, as well.
>
Is she on a dialup? If so, have her c
Kent West wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
My girlfriend uses Debian (Sarge) and has a mysterious problem
with e-mail. She has been using Thunderbird for some time,
but with Windows NT. She installed Sarge, and now she cannot
send e-mail, but she can pull, for months now. Well, she decided
to try Evo
Mike McCarty wrote:
> My girlfriend uses Debian (Sarge) and has a mysterious problem
> with e-mail. She has been using Thunderbird for some time,
> but with Windows NT. She installed Sarge, and now she cannot
> send e-mail, but she can pull, for months now. Well, she decided
> to try Evolution, and
Mike McCarty wrote:
My girlfriend uses Debian (Sarge) and has a mysterious problem
with e-mail. She has been using Thunderbird for some time,
but with Windows NT. She installed Sarge, and now she cannot
send e-mail, but she can pull, for months now. Well, she decided
to try Evolution, and it has
Thanks Magnus and Juan (again -- I owe you two!).
I greatly appreciate your help.
My best,
Luis
--- Juan Nin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you should have a FQDN hostname (fully-qualified
> domain name)
> the remote SMTP server rejects you connection,
> because your machine
> identifies itslef
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:56:56PM -0300, Juan Nin wrote:
>From: "Luis Finotti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT
>> TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> host mailv.math.ucsb.edu [128.111.88.21]: 504
>> :
>> Helo command rejected: need fully-
From: "Luis Finotti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT
> TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> host mailv.math.ucsb.edu [128.111.88.21]: 504
> :
> Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified
> hostname
you should have a FQDN hostname (fully-quali
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 07:34:23PM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there mail notification program which can check POP3/IMAP/... email
> accounts for new mails and send the result to syslog?
A bash script which uses logger can do this. Like:
fetchmail | logger
--
George Cristian Birzan
Heya,
> From: Rus Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
> Can anyone recommened a debian package that allows an email
> list -> nntp
> server for local use? Pyg looks like it will do it but just want to be
> sure..
>
Mailman has a news gateway built in.
Never used the gateway though so can'
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 10:37:14AM -0600, Gaolon O. Hall wrote:
| I had to reload all of my programs including Windows ME because of
| virus infection. Now I can not get my e-mail up. Neither Network
| Everywhere or USB ports. What has happened?
What happened was you installed Windows ME.
Try
This is a debian user list (we use Linux not windows). This is not an
appropriate place to ask for windows help.
Debian users - give this guy a break ;-)
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 05:37, Gaolon O. Hall wrote:
> I had to reload all of my programs including Windows ME because of
> virus infection. Now
I suspect you are seeing this because lists.debian.org does not accept
SMTP because RiverWillow is not a FQDN and/or is not resolvable.
Bob
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Larry W. Irwin Sr. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a new Mutt/Exim user and have a problem sending mail. Have successfully
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:59:40AM -0600, Larry W. Irwin Sr. wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I am a new Mutt/Exim user and have a problem sending mail. Have
| successfully sent e-mail using Mutt to another list and to an
| individual. When I try to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get the atta
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to send an E-MAIL says user unknown,
> went to postmaster help. Said disk was full. How do I clear
It's something the person you're sending to will have to do.
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:53:05PM -0700, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
| On Thursday 18 April 2002 07:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > Trying to send an E-MAIL says user unknown,
| > went to postmaster help. Said disk was full. How do I clear
| >
If you're getting that message on a Linux machine, log in as root and find
out what space is available on /home. I assume you do have root mounted
on a separate partition.
--
Sincerely,
David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to send an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 April 2002 07:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to send an E-MAIL says user unknown,
> went to postmaster help. Said disk was full. How do I clear
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make su
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:48:02AM +0100, Ágics Balázs wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I want to set up an e-mail alias. It's a list of my clients, and I want
| restrict this. How can I set up that just I can send an e-mail to this
| address, everybody else no?
I see you are using KMail. If only you are
on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:48:02AM +0100, Ágics Balázs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to set up an e-mail alias. It's a list of my clients, and I want
> restrict this. How can I set up that just I can send an e-mail to this
> address, everybody else no?
See /etc/aliases.
You
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:40:36AM +0800):
> 1. What if multiple users on my network have set up multiple POP3 accounts in
> the past (before the server was up) and wish to go this way, leaving their
> mail
> OFF their POP3 accounts, but ON the home server? Can this stil
also sprach nico de haer (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:10:54AM +0200):
> Up until writing this message i've recieved two replies to my erlier posting
> "e-mail. the next level". Erik and Martin think in the same line as i do.
> Carl also contributed some points of interrest. Getting mail is no problem
>
Dear Debian Users,
Up until writing this message i've recieved two replies to my erlier posting
"e-mail. the next level". Erik and Martin think in the same line as i do.
Carl also contributed some points of interrest. Getting mail is no problem
using a tool like Fetchmail. Even multiple accounts b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello Niko,
>
> I think that this is great thing to do. I am equally curious as to how to
> adopt
> this on my server at home.
>
> If anyone has good comments on how best to do this, I would welcome the
> information tremendously.
>
> Just 2 additional things:
>
>
Hello Niko,
I think that this is great thing to do. I am equally curious as to how to adopt
this on my server at home.
If anyone has good comments on how best to do this, I would welcome the
information tremendously.
Just 2 additional things:
1. What if multiple users on my network have set
nico de haer wrote:
...
> You have:
> - Debian server (mine is called gardian) able to connect to the internet:
> - Mail user agent on your client, that understands POP3 and SMTP (do you
> know one that doesn't?)
> - There is no permanent link to the Internet (Using a modem, thus in most
> cases
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:39:34PM -0300, Hammurabi Mendes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm having problems with e-mail configuration: when someone receives
> > some of my e-mails sent from debian, the From line is the following:
> >
> > From: Hammurabi das Chagas Mendes <[E
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 08:39:34PM -0300, Hammurabi Mendes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having problems with e-mail configuration: when someone receives
> some of my e-mails sent from debian, the From line is the following:
>
> From: Hammurabi das Chagas Mendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (hmendes is my u
On Monday 22 January 2001 14:42, Colin Watson wrote:
> Robert Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >i simply wanted to ask if it would be possible to get an E-mail
> > like: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Although debian.com exists and redirects to the right place,
> debian.org is the real domain; we're not
Robert Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i simply wanted to ask if it would be possible to get an E-mail like:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although debian.com exists and redirects to the right place, debian.org
is the real domain; we're not a commercial organization.
That said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] address
This smells suspiciously like a permissions (tcpd) problem. Check
/var/log/daemon.log.
If tcpd is the problem then there should be a line like:
Dec 8 18:11:53 chilin qpopper[28923]: refused connect from X.X.X.X
Also of course have a look at /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny to see how
thing
On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
baptis >Hi all,
baptis >I have working in a ISP that POP stopped to work for the clients
baptis >with modem. Altought I can telnet port 110 the clients with modem
baptis >receive the following error
baptis >
baptis >Error: Your
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 08:38:18AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> > Another thing you can do is share /var/spool/mail, so both boxes will
> > share the mailboxes. Use NFS, for example.
>
> may have to go that route. Sharing /var/spool/mail still puts the mail
> on a box
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Which boils down to this: fetching from the server is not a real
> good solution for me. Is there a text-based email client that
> uses IMAP rather than POP? Alternatively, if fetchmail had an
you could consider using Pine. It's IMAP based, though not com
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 06:03:22AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
>
> >
> > Which boils down to this: fetching from the server is not a real
> > good solution for me. Is there a text-based email client that
> > uses IMAP rather than POP? Alternatively, if fetchmail had
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 06:03:22AM -0500, Kent West wrote:
>
> Which boils down to this: fetching from the server is not a real
> good solution for me. Is there a text-based email client that
> uses IMAP rather than POP? Alternatively, if fetchmail had an
> option to fetch my messages, let me rea
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 04:25:53PM -0500, David Kanter wrote:
>
> > I use POP3 with my dial up connection, and wonder what people generally use
> > as a mail client for this situation. Do people just default to Netscape? I
> > was looking at Mutt, which looks
Oh, also check out XFMail (there is a deb for it) at xfmail.slappy.org. Does
everything you need: PGP, and the whole bit. It uses xforms, but still works
very well. It's fast, does filtering, multiple folders, multiple pop/imap,
etc, etc.
On 13-Sep-99 Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, S
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 04:25:53PM -0500, David Kanter wrote:
> I use POP3 with my dial up connection, and wonder what people generally use
> as a mail client for this situation. Do people just default to Netscape? I
> was looking at Mutt, which looks a little confusing, but seems to be somewhat
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, David Kanter wrote:
> I use POP3 with my dial up connection, and wonder what people
> generally use as a mail client for this situation. Do people just
> default to Netscape? I was looking at Mutt, which looks a little
> confusing, but seems to be somewhat popular.
Netscape is
Well, I can't claim to know anything about mutt in relation to pop3 based
email, but if it is anything like directly-connected email, you have no
choice but to use mutt. :)
hehe. Seriously though, if you thought elm was nice, pine a bit gaudy but
liked the features, then mutt you will love. Elm us
>> "Dieter" == Dieter Jdger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter> They use a perl script to rewrite outgoing mail. Now I looked
Dieter> at the doc and found that option, which can be used
Dieter> to make a director rewriting the address or not. My idea is to
Dieter> allow rewriting for outgoing mai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
>There was some discussion on how to set up Exim a few days back. I found
>the following article in the Linux Gazette
>(http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue43/stumpel.html) and it was useful (for
...
>-- Hans
They us
>> "Stephen" == Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..exim as daemon..]
Stephen> Uncomment the "exit 0" line in /etc/init.d/exim.
Also disable it in inetd.conf and reload the inetd config with
/etc/init.d/inetd reload
Ciao,
Martin
I have used this article to set up my home network and it is excellent.
Clear, concise and to the point.
One slight problem...I need to add and remove remote users a lot. Having
all mail flushed into my account and then using a .forward entry for each
user is a little clumsy.
Anyone know if exim
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 08:33:11PM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
> There was some discussion on how to set up Exim a few days back. I found
> the following article in the Linux Gazette
> (http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue43/stumpel.html) and it was useful (for
> me at least), because of the re
>> "Hans" == Hans van den Boogert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hans> So what about sending mail then? Using 'smail' sounds obvious,
Hans> but how does the route from MUA to the SMTP server go.
The MTA you install receives the mails you send using your MUA and
sends them to the destination. Either
> qmail and fetchmail are MTAs (Mail Transfer Agents), right?
qmail yes, fetchmail maybe, depending on your definition of an MTA.
> fetchmail downloads messages from a pop3/imap server and puts them into the
> local mail delivery system. (Besides, where do the messages end up and in
> what form?
Exim does permit header manipulations including rewrite.
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:03:19PM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
> Thanks for the response guys. Sofar I understand that
>
> qmail and fetchmail are MTAs (Mail Transfer Agents), right?
>
> fetchmail downloads messages from a pop3/imap server and puts them into the
> local mail delivery s
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 10:03:19PM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
>
> I've installed fetchmail and exim, but haven't had time to read the man
> pages. Does anybody have a good way to convert man pages into readable
> ASCII text, so I can print them out and read them off-line? (The purchasing
>
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
> qmail and fetchmail are MTAs (Mail Transfer Agents), right?
>
> fetchmail downloads messages from a pop3/imap server and puts them into the
> local mail delivery system. (Besides, where do the messages end up and in
> what form?)
Correct so far.
On 04-Jul-99 Pollywog wrote:
>>
> Mahogany is new, and still has some bugs, but I like it.
>
> I am still using xfmail but want to move to Mahogany as soon as some of
> the little bugs are fixed.
Thanks for the reference. I just tried mahogany. Nice GUI, and clearly
going somewhere.
I didn't stu
I was a Linux email newbie a few months back. What has brought me a good
solution is a combo consisting of exim/fetchmail/XFmail. If I were you I would
start out with XFmail on it's own. This email client is very simple to set up.
It does what you expect a normal GUI based email client to do with e
On 04-Jul-99 Lex Chive wrote:
> If you dont have a permanent connection to the internet the best way I know
> of
> is to use fetchmail. fetchmail will fetch (hehe...) the messages on your ISP
> (or your mail account wherever it is) and delivers them locally. Then you
> can
> either have your mail
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 09:43:06PM +0800, Hans van den Boogert wrote:
> Could someone please post a quick mail-system setup for dummies? As said, I
> simply want to connect to my ISP, collect/download my mail and read it in a
> browser-like X program like Mahogany. What is the principle setup? (Ple
Try looking at exmh and xmail to have a nice X front end.
fetchmail may be used to bring the mail from your ISP.
> I am using a modem and ppp to login to my ISP. What is a good setup for
> e-mail??? Currently I use NS4's e-mail but it is a little buggy and
> crashes often. I would like to have
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998 18:54:35 EST, Shaleh wrote:
> I am using a modem and ppp to login to my ISP. What is a good setup for
> e-mail??? Currently I use NS4's e-mail but it is a little buggy and
> crashes often. I would like to have a nice X front end. I currently
> recieve between 250 and 350 e-m
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> I am using a modem and ppp to login to my ISP. What is a good setup for
> e-mail??? Currently I use NS4's e-mail but it is a little buggy and
> crashes often. I would like to have a nice X front end. I currently
> recieve between 250 and 350 e-mails a day a
eugene mendoza writes:
>
> I'm trying to setup a email server on linux box which
> has sendmail ver 8.6.12.
> I've a subdomain of my own.
> What is the simplest way of doing this?
> The email will be stored on the linux server
> which will also be a name server and provide other
> services.
> Much
Kevin Traas writes:
> 1. The accounts on vnet will have to exist on hicks before hicks will
> accept e-mail for those users, right?
Not necesserily. You may install them as follows in /etc/aliases
joey: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wuschel:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
> 1. The accounts on vnet will have to exist on hicks before hicks will
> accept e-mail for those users, right?
Yes. You have to set up the accounts first.
> 2. What problems might I have with incoming mail? i.e. If a message was
> addressed to [EMAIL
81 matches
Mail list logo
