On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:22 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:46:20PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing.
>
> I have no operational experience of OSPF nor FRR. I do what you're doing
> but with BI
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 11:57 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:54:10PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> > I changed the default gateway config to:
> > ### Configure Static IP addresses and default gateway's.
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet static
> > address 10.1
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 8:09 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 7:35 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
>> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 7:35 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
> timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
>> have t
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
> have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
> loopback configured with a /32. The goal is t
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:54:10PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I changed the default gateway config to:
> ### Configure Static IP addresses and default gateway's.
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 10.1.1.2/30
> up route add -net default gw 10.1.1.1 metric 1024 dev et
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 06:46:20PM -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing.
I have no operational experience of OSPF nor FRR. I do what you're doing
but with BIRD, BGP and ECMP. I think you'll probably need to ask
questions o
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 6:46 PM Timothy M Butterworth <
timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have been working out how to have my server setup with OSPF routing. I
> have two network interfaces each configured with a /30 and one dummy
> loopback configured with a /32. The goal is t
https://lartc.org/ will help you.
Exactly https://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
In my same setup i was add some 'up ip rule add ...' lines into
/etc/network/interfaces
I finally resolved the issue with the helps of your article and this
one:
https://blog.scottlowe.org/2013
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
Hello list,
I have a networking question that I can't understand for.
I have the Debian 11 host with two ethernet cards.
There is public IP and gateway for each ethernet card.
(they are public IPs from two different net address blocks.)
Say:
eth0 ip:
On 20/3/23 17:21, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I get the impression the problem is to send return traffic back out on the
interface it came in on.
If this is it, then rp_filter, as I proposed elsewhere in this
thread, seems like exactly made for this.
I'm afraid poking kernel parameters is beyond
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 05:15:57PM +0800, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>
> On 20/3/23 16:39, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
> > пн, 20 мар. 2023 г. в 12:33, :
> >
> > > I have a networking question that I can't understand for.
> > > I have the Debian 11 host with two ethernet cards.
> > > There is public IP and
On 20/3/23 16:39, Stanislav Vlasov wrote:
пн, 20 мар. 2023 г. в 12:33, :
I have a networking question that I can't understand for.
I have the Debian 11 host with two ethernet cards.
There is public IP and gateway for each ethernet card.
(they are public IPs from two different net address bloc
пн, 20 мар. 2023 г. в 12:33, :
> I have a networking question that I can't understand for.
> I have the Debian 11 host with two ethernet cards.
> There is public IP and gateway for each ethernet card.
> (they are public IPs from two different net address blocks.)
[...]
> When clients from outside
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:23:15PM +0800, f...@dnsbed.com wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a networking question that I can't understand for.
> I have the Debian 11 host with two ethernet cards.
> There is public IP and gateway for each ethernet card.
> (they are public IPs from two different net a
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:53:32 -0700
Fred wrote:
> On 3/13/23 08:55, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > malpaso wrote:
> >> *Hello!!!Please, I'm looking for guidance to set up a Server, it will not
> >> be public, to host a flight simulator called Falcon BMS, about 12 people
> >> flying online, the machine woul
On 3/13/23 08:55, Dan Ritter wrote:
malpaso wrote:
*Hello!!!Please, I'm looking for guidance to set up a Server, it will not
be public, to host a flight simulator called Falcon BMS, about 12 people
flying online, the machine would be an I5 with 16 GB of RAM, Video Card GTX
1050 TI and a 480 GB S
malpaso wrote:
> *Hello!!!Please, I'm looking for guidance to set up a Server, it will not
> be public, to host a flight simulator called Falcon BMS, about 12 people
> flying online, the machine would be an I5 with 16 GB of RAM, Video Card GTX
> 1050 TI and a 480 GB SSD, please what would you guid
Hi, Celejar
On 09/09/16 18:18, Celejar wrote:
My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the newest WiFi
hardware can match or b
Hi, deloptes.
On 09/09/16 19:06, deloptes wrote:
>> Still, 20-24 Mbps is more than 10 Mpbs I was seeing with rsync. There
>> could be a bottleneck somewhere?
> In my case it was the IO on the disk - I couldn't do more than 12Mbps even
> on wired connection, because I have encrypted disk ... it t
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:53:20 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:40:26 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 September 2016 10:26:15 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, September 10, 2016 08:41:53 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > It's in megabytes per seco
On 09/10/2016 07:23 PM, Celejar wrote:
> FTR: there seem to be more typos / here. The actual figure should be
> 11034157.6344 bits/second.
Yes, let's whip those typos out of this dead horse some more:
On 09/09/2016 08:36 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> Benchmarking using WiFi (48 Mb/s):
>
> 2
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:43:44 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 12:43 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > On 09/08/16 22:57, David Christensen wrote:
> >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
> >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps);
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:36:39 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
> > David Christensen wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
> >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wir
On Saturday 10 September 2016 10:53:20 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:40:26 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 September 2016 10:26:15 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, September 10, 2016 08:41:53 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > It's in megabytes per
On 09/10/2016 07:53 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:40:26 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
>> You make an assumption many folks do, but theres a start bit and a stop
>> bit so the math is more like 1000/10=100 Mb/s.
>
>
> Well, 1000/8 is still 125 ;-) but I wouldn't have
On Saturday, September 10, 2016 10:40:26 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 10 September 2016 10:26:15 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 10, 2016 08:41:53 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > It's in megabytes per second, so assume 1000/8 = 250 MB/s is the
> > > bandwidth of a gigabit et
On Saturday 10 September 2016 10:26:15 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 08:41:53 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> > It's in megabytes per second, so assume 1000/8 = 250 MB/s is the
> > bandwidth of a gigabit ethernet NIC.
>
> Sorry, I tend to pick at nits, but, for the record, 100
On Saturday, September 10, 2016 08:41:53 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> It's in megabytes per second, so assume 1000/8 = 250 MB/s is the
> bandwidth of a gigabit ethernet NIC.
Sorry, I tend to pick at nits, but, for the record, 1000/8 is 125 Mb/s. It
doesn't (really) change your conclusions.
regards,
R
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 01:22:45AM -0400, Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 23:14:30 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> Good eye! I was going to say it's not possible to get 110Mb/s over 802.11g;
> 40-50 is closer tothe best I get. And 193Mb/s over 100Mb/s ethernet is right
> out; best I'
On 09/09/2016 09:14 PM, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Sep 2016 at 20:36:39 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
>> So, 1048576900 bytes * 8 bits / byte / 76.024 seconds
> ↑
>
> What's this 9?
A typographical error.
104857600 bytes * 8 bits/byte / 76.024 seconds
= 11034158 bits/secon
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 23:14:30 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 09 Sep 2016 at 20:36:39 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> > On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
> > > David Christensen wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiF
On Fri 09 Sep 2016 at 20:36:39 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
> > David Christensen wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
> >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps).
On 09/09/2016 12:43 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On 09/08/16 22:57, David Christensen wrote:
>> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
>> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
>> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the ne
On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
> David Christensen wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
>> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
>> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Still, 20-24 Mbps is more than 10 Mpbs I was seeing with rsync. There
> could be a bottleneck somewhere?
In my case it was the IO on the disk - I couldn't do more than 12Mbps even
on wired connection, because I have encrypted disk ... it took me a while
to understand why t
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:46:35 -0300
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Celejar.
>
> On 09/09/16 15:51, Celejar wrote:
>
> >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
> >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
> >> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) shou
Hi, Celejar.
On 09/09/16 15:51, Celejar wrote:
>> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
>> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
>> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the newest WiFi
>> hardware can match or beat Gig
Hi, David.
Thanks for your reply.
On 09/08/16 22:57, David Christensen wrote:
>> As you can see, the transfer was over than 3 GB and it were not hung. I
>> did several tests and all were without problems.
>>
>> I wonder if in the mentioned episodes of hangs you remember whether the
>> transferre
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
...
> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet. Wireless data
> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps). Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
> slow. Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the newest WiFi
> hardware can matc
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/askpfeplat/2016/05/02/installing-bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows-10-insider-preview/
I recently upgraded a Windows 10 PC to the last 1607 build: with the
developper mode enabled, one have access to "windows subsystem for linux
(beta)". the official Microsoft port of Ubuntu bash.
sshd is part of the bundle (I've not tested it, though).
On 08/09/2016 04:27 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> As you can see, the transfer was over than 3 GB and it were not hung. I
> did several tests and all were without problems.
>
> I wonder if in the mentioned episodes of hangs you remember whether the
> transferred volume was higher or lower than in th
Best options is put an SMB/NFS share for all the windows clients on your
backup server.
RAID it and run $whatever backup tools you wish on the exports.
If you need OS level backups, the best way is to use ISCSI mounts served
from the NAS/SAN to be the root of the windows machines.
On 3 August 20
Hi, Didier.
On 03/08/16 05:30, didier gaumet wrote:
>> But to use Dirvish with Windows clients I will need to install an SSH
>> server [...] on Windows.
> Apart from a Cygwin solution, it seems there is an open official
> Microsoft OpenSSH port (including SSHD service) effort:
>
> https://blog
Hi, David.
On 09/08/16 00:21, David Christensen wrote:
>> He also mentions a [Cygwin rsync] problem to doing backup over open files.
>> Have you
>> experienced that problem?
> I'm not sure. It's been many moons since I tried to do automated
> backups of Windows machines using rsync.
Well, I'
On 08/08/2016 11:29 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 08/08/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
We also have security
implications as the backup server and the Windows computer are in
different offices, so the backup would be over the Internet.
For security, you can use an SSH tunnel (Cygwin
On 08/08/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> We also have security
> implications as the backup server and the Windows computer are in
> different offices, so the backup would be over the Internet.
For security, you can use an SSH tunnel (Cygwin openssh on the Windows
machine).
Backing up ove
On 08/08/2016 11:25 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> He also mentions a [Cygwin rsync] problem to doing backup over open files.
> Have you
> experienced that problem?
I'm not sure. It's been many moons since I tried to do automated
backups of Windows machines using rsync.
> An alternative that I th
Hi, Glenn.
On 08/08/16 18:34, Glenn English wrote:
>>> I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
>>> on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
>>> occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
>>> clients, but now I would l
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
>> on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
>> occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
>> c
Hi, Darac.
On 03/08/16 05:49, Darac Marjal wrote:
>> I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
>> on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
>> occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
>> clients, but now I would like a
Hi, David.
On 03/08/16 00:23, David Christensen wrote:
>> I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
>> on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
>> occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
>> clients, but now I would l
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
Hi all!
I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
clients, but now I w
Le 02/08/2016 à 23:12, Daniel Bareiro a écrit :
[...]
> But to use Dirvish with Windows clients I will need to install an SSH
> server [...] on Windows.
[...]
Apart from a Cygwin solution, it seems there is an open official
Microsoft OpenSSH port (including SSHD service) effort:
https://blogs.ms
On 08/02/2016 02:12 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I'm thinking deploy a Debian backup server using Dirvish (which is based
> on rsync --- indeed, we have packaged it in Debian). On previous
> occasions I implemented these solutions seamlessly with GNU/Linux
> clients, but now I would like add Windows
Hi,
I don't know much about kernel debugging myself, but this looks like
something to report. Take a look at [0] on how to do that.
Regards
/peter
[0] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Am 07.07.2016 um 08:38 schrieb Christian Harris:
> Hello All,
>
> I am hoping to get some help with one o
On 07/06/2016 11:38 PM, Christian Harris wrote:
I am hoping to get some help with one of my virtual machines. I am running
a KVM host with several virtual machines provide internet services to a
small network. The gateway machine is a Debian 8 minimum install that was
updated to 8.5. ...
I use
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:39:05 + (UTC) Camaleón
shared this with us all:
>I can connect to that servers from here (Spain). Maybe you should
>check your whole Internet connection... Can you browse
>(ping/traceroute) other sites? :-?
>
>Greetings,
Thank you,I think it is my ISP that's the proble
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:20:20 +1100, Charlie wrote:
> Been off the Internet for a couple of weeks satellite equipment went
> belly up.
>
> Can't connect to Debian server to upgrade my system. Did something
> change in the last few weeks? Aptitude update, just gets errors saying:
>
> Err http://ft
Hi!
> He's talking out of his bottom.
>
> I also walk the Dark Path, and I administer a Small Business Server 2003,
> based on Windows Server 2003. It has an Etch server, two routers and a
> printer in the forward lookup zone of the local domain, absolutely none of
> which are domain members, b
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:37:23PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Mirco Piccin wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip ad
Mirco Piccin wrote:
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
working.
Is there some problem with ad
Hi all!
> I too ran into that issue with the 2k3 DNS server I use. For me, I just
> set up the nsupdate command within a cron job to run weekly. The forced
> update resets the time counter on our 2k3 DNS server. I do not know if
> it is the same on yours.
>
> I read the man pages again and did
>I am not the Windows Administrator. So i call the man who administer
>the DNS and DHCP server.
>He tell me that the Windows 2003 DNS service does not allow dns entry
>update if the machine is not registered in Active Directory.
>
>Of course those Debian machine are NOT registered in AD.
>So, the w
Hi all.
> > I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> > environment.
> > Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> > They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
> > working.
> Is there some problem with addin
>To be honest, I am not sure why that did not work. To be sure I typed
>out everything to you correctly, I just added a Debian Lenny machine to
>the Windows 2k3 DNS server at my work with the same (cut and paste)
>directions. It worked right off the bat.
>
>I am 100% certain that this is the utilit
Mirco Piccin wrote:
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed and
working.
Any tips?
Is there some problem
Hi all!
On 6/25/08, Stackpole, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris understand well my situation.
> So i try his suggest:
> # apt-get install dnsutils
> # touch /etc/nsupdate.conf
>
> edit that file in this way:
>
> update delete HostName.DomainName.com. A
> update add HostName.DomainNam
Chris understand well my situation.
So i try his suggest:
# apt-get install dnsutils
# touch /etc/nsupdate.conf
edit that file in this way:
update delete HostName.DomainName.com. A
update add HostName.DomainName.com. 86400 A 192.168.1.1
show
send
quit
(where HostName.DomainName.com is my Debian
Hi and thanks all.
> Ahhh, the Socrates method, my fav form of instruction.
>
> Mirco, as Ron is hinting at and as I said (see the "first idea" I had) run a
> DNS server. DNS came about because sys admin became to in shape and
> physically dangerous to there managers from all the running around t
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:59:33 am Ron Johnson wrote:
Snip
> >
> > Yes, i know, if i modify hosts file both in linux and in windows machine
> > i will not have more problems to ping those 2 new Debian servers.
> > But there are a lot of people (and computer) that use services running
> > on tho
Hi all.
I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
environment.
Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed
and working.
Any tips?
Thanks!
Regards
M
Hello,
I believe you are
Hi Mirco,
Unless I am mistaken, if you don't have a DNS Server then winbind
should do the trick.
-Elijah
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Mirco Piccin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/25/08 08:51, Mirco Piccin wrote:
> Hi!
>> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
>
> Thanks Bob:
>> You may need to add relevant entries to the hosts file in each windows
> machine
>
> ...and Damon for yours repl
Hi!
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
Thanks Bob:
> You may need to add relevant entries to the hosts file in each windows
machine
...and Damon for yours replies
> If you put those entries into another hosts hosts file, then you can ping
this
> host from tha
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 09:14:42 am Mirco Piccin wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> They are configured with a static ip address and have samba installed an
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 15:14:42 +0200, Mirco Piccin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have 2 new running Debian Etch :-) server into an (old) Windows
> environment.
> Servers work like a charm, but i am not able to ping them by hostname.
> They are configured with a static ip address and
On Jan 7, 2008 3:49 AM, rudolf vavra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to buy server Intel x3400, Xeon Quad Core E5320 with Express 250GB
> SATA HDD. At home I use Debian 4.0. Please, can I use this server with
> Debian 4.0 or 3.1, if there are problems with drivers etc.
> I want to use Debian
David Labens:
> I'm interested in the Debian Linux software for use in
> building a home file server. I'll need it to provide
> print server function
CUPS.
> as well as file backup
Several options, depending on your needs.
> and UPS shutdown support.
Depends on UPS in use. Many are supported
Am 2006-06-27 15:16:50, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> My _personal_ recommendation is not to use a hardware-raid (depending on
> your data-security considerations). Our hardware-raid-5 controller
> recently died just a few weeks before guarantee expired. Had it survived
> some more weeks, it w
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:10:45 + (GMT)
ZeroUno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:00:27AM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Kevin Mark ha scritto:
> That's why I'm here.
> Being sure about this, based only on vendor and official web site
> informations, is not possible. They simply tell you that they are sure
> their stuff works fine with RH etc., and that t
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm look
Kevin Mark ha scritto:
more modern CPU (maybe a dual cpu) and such. If you are not monitoring
your useage, it would be a good way to determine if you need a new
machine.
The current server actually satisfies our current needs, it's not
overloaded. But we are in one of those times when the com
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:10:45PM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgr
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:10 +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it,
ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
"standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL server
ZeroUno wrote:
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm looking for an Intel
s
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a b
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Xen, some gigs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Aube wrote:
| Tomy Alarie wrote:
|
|> No, i'm trying to setup a debian server behind the IPCop, the
|> server is plugged on the green interface and red is modem with
|> PPPoE. Apache won't start and this is the error : "Could not
|> determine the
Tomy Alarie wrote:
> No, i'm trying to setup a debian server behind the IPCop, the server is
> plugged on the green interface and red is modem with PPPoE. Apache won't
> start and this is the error : "Could not determine the server's fully
> qualified domain name" . Any ideas ?
The ServerName set
No, i'm trying to setup a debian server behind the IPCop, the server is
plugged on the green interface and red is modem with PPPoE. Apache won't
start and this is the error : "Could not determine the server's fully
qualified domain name" . Any ideas ?
thanks
-
e6e9fe46b17fa16d9a250d418
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pls can you explaine what you are trying to do in more detail?
You don not what to he hosting data on the IPCOP machine. Apache on
IPCOP is only there for configuration of IPCOP.
If you want to host content then you will need to set up a orange interfac
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:55:32PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:07:20AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > I could pay $35 to 1-800-US-SEARCH and really fuck up your day!
>
> IANAL, but watch it. You're crossing into threats and harassment
> territory with that one.
No, agressive-t
AIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, 5 December 2003 8:58 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Debian Server Compromise -- A Fire Drill ??
> > >
> > >
> > > It's "cracker". Not "hacker".
> > > http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 01:55, Joyce, Matthew wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ScruLoose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 5 December 2003 8:58 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:37:04PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:18:55PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> What the fuck are you ranting about?
>
>
>
> I'm not taking the bait anymore.
But you still missed his point about quoting proper
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
