On 2009-06-25, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I updated my testing system, as usual, this morning, but then
> suspended my machine (so everything worked as it had been all day).
> This evening, I rebooted, and suddenly no sites could be found.
> (Other machines on my network did not have the problem.)
Another thing.
And what's been happening usually is that when I'm browsing I brake in
the following URL with nothing printed on the screen:
http://domains.googlesyndication.com/apps/domainpark/domainpark.cgi?client=ca-dp-mdnh&ref=http%3A%2F%2F
[field1]&s=mynewslink.com&ip=[field2]&kw_type=br
Jeff D on 10/08/07 04:07, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
How exactly would I set the domain name on the machine - the name I
thought I'd chosen when setting up the system from CD?
At the moment on this machi
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However
Jeff D on 09/08/07 00:55, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients.
However it
doesn't recognise any internal net
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hos
Jeff D on 08/08/07 00:34, wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fq
On Aug 7, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Something is rewriting my resolv.conf at least every minute. I
suspected it must be dnsmasq attempting to do the DNS but I just
stopped dnsmasq, and yet resolv.conf is still being updated. I had
a look over my ps output but dont see anything tha
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/08/07 21:04, wrote:
My server isengard runs dnsmasq to provide the dhcp clients. However it
doesn't
recognise any internal network domain name:
isengard:~# hostname
isengard
isengard:~# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Unknown host
isengard:~# nslookup gondor
Server: 194
> I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of
> 4
> PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
> browsing,
> ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
>
> Now I am trying to get DNS to work for local machines but it won't co-
> operate. I
> spent the la
David Brodbeck on 06/08/07 19:11, wrote:
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:50:21PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> >>I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
> >>of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everyth
On Aug 6, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Adam Hardy wrote:
Please send us your /etc/hosts file. Every box needs a minimal
/etc/hosts file with at least its own hostname (though I'v never used
DHCP). The box running dnsmasq should have all the hosts on your
network listed in /etc/hosts for dnsmasq to read.
Douglas Allan Tutty on 06/08/07 14:27, wrote:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
N
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:39:56PM +0100, Adam Hardy wrote:
> I installed dnsmasq to run DNS and DHCP servers on my little home network
> of 4 PCs and a couple of laptops, and everything was going fine, internet
> browsing, ssh, ftp by IP address etc.
>
> Now I am trying to get DNS to work for l
Hello,
try entering your IPS's dns servers in the file:
/etc/resolv.conf
i.e.
echo "nameserver xx.yy.zz.ww" > /etc/resolv.conf
where xx.yy.zz.www is the nameserver your ISP provides
for you.
It is strange however, that irc and pings work ...
Maybe that is a temporary error, or someone within
y
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:47:50PM -0800, RituRaj wrote:
> I have DNS problem. THe mails from our company sent
> outside have started buncing with following error. It
> was working till yesterday...
>
> ... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
> >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3535954
> <<< 4
I need to see the Bind configuration files to resolve your problem.
Regards,
Eriberto
RituRaj escreveu:
... while talking to smtp.pspl.co.in.:
MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=3535954
<<< 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve
Deferred: 451 4.1.8 Domain
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Rob Weir wrote:
> How do your logs look? Do they give any more info about wht postfix is
> bouncing it? Are you running a spamfilter or something that's a little
> overzealous?
>
I am running spamassassin (if you have a public mail server you've got to
nowadays.) but postfi
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:04:56AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Again this appears to be the only site which is having any problems but
> it's a big one. Before I begin the arduous process of finding a clueful
> human at Yahoo to talk to, can anyone spot mistakes in my setup which
> could be ca
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
> on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
> >
> > > on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > After upgrading, I am unable to connect
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> > on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with
> > > fetchmail, to remo
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 10:51:02AM -0500, Giulio Morgan wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
>
> > on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
> > > remore
> > > hosts with
kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:
> on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
> > remore
> > hosts with apt, telnet, ssh, irc, lynx or mozilla. Messages are:
> > unable to resolve h
on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to
> remore
> hosts with apt, telnet, ssh, irc, lynx or mozilla. Messages are:
> unable to resolve host...
> something wicked happened...
> do
Been reading RFC2317, eh?
It might be freaking out because if the CNAME domain. Try this and see if
it fixes it:
perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa. IN NS NS2.perens.com.
186.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.IN CNAME 186.perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.
Then you master perens.108.15.216.in-addr.arpa.
an
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:16:43PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I'm stumped. Connects from my mail delivery system are being refused by
> hotmail, oreilly.com, brics.dk, and a number of other sites. I suspect
> that I've done something stupid in my DNS and am being rejected by sites
> that set ALL:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 07:45:25PM -0400, Spinfire Magenta wrote:
> My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
> using Centralinfo. Granite canyon was more flakey and went up and
> down like a cheap whore on a busy night.
Not having any experience with either one, I can't g
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 02:09:27PM -0400, Anson Ng wrote:
> I want to host the domain for my LAN, which consists of a Linux box
> (24.123.456.789) running www, mail, news, ftp for public access and the
> internal LAN (192.168.1.x). Last night, I configured a primary DNS server
> for "impko.com"
On 30-Aug-2000 Spinfire Magenta wrote:
> on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +, Pollywog spewed forth on stone
> tablets:
>> What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
>> Wouldn't those work?
>
> My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:19:27PM +, Pollywog spewed forth on stone
tablets:
> What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
> Wouldn't those work?
My own experiences with GraniteCanyon and Centralinfo.net left me
using Centralinfo. Granite canyon was more flake
What about using GraniteCanyon (www.granitecanyon.com) or Centralinfo.net?
Wouldn't those work?
I did not know that NSI allowed domain registrants to "park" domains with them.
--
Andrew
Anson Ng wrote:
> Hi, (I'm sorry for the long email, but since I've to tell situation)
>
> I've registered a domain name "impko.com" at Network Solutions. But
> since I haven't setup my DNS server and running properly, I parked it to
> Network solutions for the time being. I want to host the dom
"Jean-Yves F. Barbier" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little problem with my provider DNS: mine is much faster, but I need
> to
> access the provider's if I want to have the news groups and mail sending
> allowed, because my identification is made by these DNS (I'm on a cable
> network).
> So how
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Damon Buckwalter wrote:
> Shao Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
> > 4.5:
> >
> > Bad Domain
> >
> > DNS NAME:
> > Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
> > IP Address: 137.154.230.60
> > Your DNS nam
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Damon Buckwalter wrote:
[ snip ]
: Why not just install the netscape packages? They're in potato, and
: slink too I belive. The "Export Version" of Netscape contains only
: 40-bit encryption, instead of 128-bit, that's the only difference.
... and Fortify patches most a
Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can download the Netscape binary from ftp.netscape.com or use the
> one in slink, and in either case, you can upgrade to 128bit encryption
> using fortify.net's software. http://fortify.net is your friend.
There are fortify packages in non-US.
Damon Buckwalter wrote:
>
> Shao Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
> > 4.5:
> >
> > Bad Domain
> >
> > DNS NAME:
> > Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
> > IP Address: 137.154.230.60
> > Your DNS name probably won't be ac
Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> when I download netscape, I got the following error from Netscape
> 4.5:
>
> Bad Domain
>
> DNS NAME:
> Host Name: november.uws.EDU.AU
> IP Address: 137.154.230.60
> Your DNS name probably won't be accepted. Click here for more info.
>
> I clicked
Dennis Dai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a debian box connecting to our intranet which has an DNS server.
> I also have a modem that I can dial to my ISP to browse the Internet.
> So, I have to have 2 entries in /etc/resolv.conf, one for intranet and
> the other for my ISP.
>
> The problem is that w
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 03:35:16PM -0500, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
> That's a bit of a broad sweeping statement. I guess you'll be using 7-bit
> ASCII in the year 2050 then.
Most already use ISO-8895-1 for news/mail. This is liable to be
replaced by UTF-? (I'm not up to scratch on Unicode things). Bo
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 03:16:07PM -0500, Scott Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
> > If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
> Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
> client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usu
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
> > Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
> > client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
> > delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
> It's fine with me if you carry on with the "war", but I'd appreciate being
> left out of it even though I started it..
OK, no war. Just seems a little shortsighted to throw out the message
because of the medium.
TL
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS M
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
: I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
: /var/log/messages:
:
: Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: "axionet.com IN MX" points to a CNAME
: (mail.axionet.com)
: Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: "axionet.com IN MX" point
ciate being
left out of it even though I started it..
Later,
Kevin Traas
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tommy Lakofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Kevin Traas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Debian
Date: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 10:04 PM
Subject:
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Tommy Lakofski wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
> > Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
> > client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
> > delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
> Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
> client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
> delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
That's a bit of a broad sweeping statement. I gues
>> If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>
>Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
>client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
>delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
Yeah, apologies to everyone about tha
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
> If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
Okay, first suggestion is to turn off rich text or HTML email in your mail
client. Email does NOT have pretty colors or centering and I usually just
delete any message I see which looks like a webpage.
> I
I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
/var/log/messages:
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: "axionet.com IN MX" points to a CNAME
(mail.axionet.com)
Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: "axionet.com IN MX" points to a CNAME
(smtp.axionet.com)
Oh, and axionet
Kevin Traas wrote:
>
> If you've got a suggestion, I'd love to hear it.
>
> I've just had a client contact me. Their getting the following in
> /var/log/messages:
>
> Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140]: "axionet.com IN MX" points to a
> CNAME (mail.axionet.com)
> Dec 2 12:47:16 inetgw named[140
53 matches
Mail list logo
