kmself@ix.netcom.com writes:

> on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:54:37PM -0500, Giulio Morgan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
> wrote:
> > After upgrading, I am unable to connect to mailserver with fetchmail, to 
> > remore
> > hosts with apt, telnet, ssh, irc, lynx or mozilla. Messages are:
> > unable to resolve host...
> > something wicked happened...
> > domain name could not be confirmed...
> > it appears that there is a problem with DNS and I have no idea how to 
> > resolve
> > it.
> 
> Is your named daemon running?  I've found that several daemons fail to
> restart after upgrades.  DNS resolution tends to be poor without a
> running named....

Thank you Karsten, 

I can't determine if my "named" is running. I checked logs to see if I could
find any meaningful indication, and comparing pre- and post-upgrade logs, I
noted that in the post-upgrade syslog, there is an entry: 
...inetd[1731]: smtp/tcp: bind: Address already in use
which does not appear in my pre-upgrade logs

In the ppp.log, there is a line:
...ppd[324]: not replacing existing default route to tap0 [0.0.0.0]
and then further down, after immediately after connection is established, the
following lines appear:
...ppd[324]: local address...
...ppd[324]: remote address 198.6.71.8 (correct address, line not copied
verbatim)
...ppd[324]: script /etc/ppp/ip-up started
up to here, everything as before, then,
...diald[207]: calling site 192.168.0.2 (don't know whose address)
...diald[207]: Error opening device /dev/modem: no such file or directory
...diald[207]: No devices free to call out on

In pre-upgrade log, the next line after script /etc/ppp/ip-up started, I don't
remember exactly, but some indication of the successful completion of the
script, diald not invoked.

>From here, I don't know what has caused this problem nor any good idea how to
solve it.

I will be grateful for any help,

Peter

ps. to explain why someone who can't manage networking at this level needs to
use woody: xfree86 4. Support for my riva tnt, makes a big difference.

-- 
Giulio Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to