-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 19 April 2004 07:51 am, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Does anybody know for sure on which version of Debian Corel Linux was
> based? I'm pretty sure it was before Potato - Potato was probably
> still testing, but I'm not familiar with Debian that fa
On Mon 19 April 2004 12:24, Bob Underwood wrote:
> On Monday 19 April 2004 11:51 am, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > Does anybody know for sure on which version of Debian Corel Linux
> > was based? I'm pretty sure it was before Potato - Potato was
> > probably still testing, but I'm not familiar with Debi
On Monday 19 April 2004 11:51 am, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Does anybody know for sure on which version of Debian Corel Linux was
> based? I'm pretty sure it was before Potato - Potato was probably still
> testing, but I'm not familiar with Debian that far back.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Kind regards
> Hans d
ing it
>
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
> Subject: Re: Re: Corel Linux
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:19:22 +1000
> From: "ann Barbara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Hereward Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> this is bullsh
you have a interesting way of putting it
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Re: Corel Linux
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:19:22 +1000
From: "ann Barbara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hereward Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
this is bullshit
- Origi
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Bruce wrote:
>I hope you can direct me. I have just bought corel linux and instakll it
>in its own partition. My problem is that i cant get my modem to
>initialise. It works quite well with windows me on the same machine, but
>when i query the modem on linux it returns nothing
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 08:29:58PM +1000, Bruce wrote:
> I hope you can direct me. I have just bought corel linux and install
> it in its own partition. My problem is that i cant get my modem to
> initialise. It works quite well with windows me on the same machine,
> but when i query the modem on
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Corel Linux
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:37:42 +
From: Hereward Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 19 July 2001 10:29, Bruce wrote:
> I hope you can direct me. I have ju
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 12:18:02PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> >
> >Found the problem. As soon as I set up her printcap file with a valid
> >entry, it works fine. Baad Corel...
> >
> Are you saying that you first need to set up a printing system and then
> choose a printer in the Photopaint config
At 04:50 PM 4/13/01 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:16:16PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
>> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> If you post the error to one of the corel newsgroups, you may get some
>> help. Without the error I can't help you, and I'm
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:16:16PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> If you post the error to one of the corel newsgroups, you may get some
> help. Without the error I can't help you, and I'm trying to recover
> from corel apps anyway. 8^)
Foun
On Friday 13 April 2001 17:40, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> Does anyone know of a vector based drawin program for linux ? I've
> been using flash at work but want to do similar things at home ...
KIllustrator, if you can withstand KDE. It passes my ultimate test
for a vector graphics program -- drawi
on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:40:01AM +0200, Joris Lambrecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Does anyone know of a vector based drawin program for linux ? I've been
> using flash at work but want to do similar things at home ...
Does Dia fit the bill?
--
Karsten M. Self http://kmself.home.netcom.
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey people. We're playing with Corel Photopaint 9 for Linux on a Debian
> 2.2 box, and we're not getting very far. It installed fine, it starts fine.
> Unfortunately, as soon as you try to open a new document, it bails on an
> unhandled except
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:32:51AM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> Do you know Gimp? I can't think of a reason to use PhotoPaint when there's
> Gimp.
Better designed menus? Actual help system? I use the GIMP (or for
some purposes, ImageMagick) more often, but there are things I find
easier to d
ijdag 13 april 2001 11:33
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: corel photopaint
>
>
> On Friday 13 April 2001 04:10, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> > Hey people. We're playing with Corel Photopaint 9 for Linux on a
> Debian
> > 2.2
I believe that 'sketch' may be worth a look, even though it is a 'work
in progress'.
Raymond
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:40:01AM +0200, Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> Does anyone know of a vector based drawin program for linux ? I've been
> using flash at work but want to do similar things at home ...
Does anyone know of a vector based drawin program for linux ? I've been
using flash at work but want to do similar things at home ...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Voigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2001 11:33
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re:
On Friday 13 April 2001 04:10, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey people. We're playing with Corel Photopaint 9 for Linux on a Debian
> 2.2 box, and we're not getting very far. It installed fine, it starts fine.
> Unfortunately, as soon as you try to open a new document, it bails on an
> unhandled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I successfully installed the documentation for Debian Wine, but I cannot
> install the actual program. Corel Linux (version 2) keeps giving me "file
> dependency" errors. Unfortuanately, I am new at this, and need some
> advice.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> CTK
> [EMA
Aaron Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1) When this is all done, will settings in /etc, such as my network
> > settings be changed?
>
> apt-get always asks you before overwriting a /etc file. Just select 'no'
> (the default, iirc) and it will leave the /etc settings untouched. (It
> will
> 1) When this is all done, will settings in /etc, such as my network
> settings be changed?
apt-get always asks you before overwriting a /etc file. Just select 'no'
(the default, iirc) and it will leave the /etc settings untouched. (It
will do this for each /etc/ file separately, so you can clo
Aaron Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (among other things):
>...
>3. Remove all packages with the string "corel" in them. You can get
>...
>4. Edit /etc/apt/sources.list to point to where the new packages are
>...
>5. As root type:
> apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
>...
Okay, I a
Aaron Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 6. KDE is now gone (CorelOS comes with a Corelized version of KDE,
> which you removed a few steps ago). In its stead, I installed
> gnome. [1] Install the necessary gnome stuff with this command:
> apt-get install gdm gnome-bin gnome-pa
Aaron Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Someone asked, so here's how I transmuted my version of CorelOS to
> more or less "pure" debian. Though this worked for me, it might be a
> good idea to read any comments made on this post before doing this,
> since IANAG (i am not a guru)
>
> 1. Esta
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000 18:04:01 -0300, Rogerio Brito wrote:
>On Aug 06 2000, Aaron Maxwell wrote:
>> One gripe: my particular instance of CorelOS was missing a lot of packages
>> hackers are used to, both on the harddrive and the distro CD. E.g., I was
>> HORRIFIED to learn that no flavor of emacs wa
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> On Aug 06 2000, Aaron Maxwell wrote:
> > One gripe: my particular instance of CorelOS was missing a lot of packages
> > hackers are used to, both on the harddrive and the distro CD. E.g., I was
> > HORRIFIED to learn that no flavor of emacs was present :
On Aug 06 2000, Aaron Maxwell wrote:
> One gripe: my particular instance of CorelOS was missing a lot of packages
> hackers are used to, both on the harddrive and the distro CD. E.g., I was
> HORRIFIED to learn that no flavor of emacs was present :) [2]
That was my biggest gripe too. :-)
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 10:05:08AM -0700, Aaron Maxwell wrote:
> I think it's fine.
>
> My 1-month-old system came with CorelOS preinstalled. I used it for a
> week until I changed it to "pure" debian [1].
I too has a similar experience: because slink won't install on my new Atlon,
I installed C
gt; Hi all
>
> Any one have an opinion, good or bad, re: Corel Linux?
> I have just obtained a copy and don't know much about it. I have been
> using freeBSD and Slack for a desktop only box.
> It appears to be targeted at people like me, who only have one
>
On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 06:17:09PM -0700, Jeff Roediger wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Any one have an opinion, good or bad, re: Corel Linux?
> I have just obtained a copy and don't know much about it. I have been
> using freeBSD and Slack for a desktop only box.
> It ap
Why Corel when you have Debian?
Corel is based on Debian, but not at all good like it.
> Hi all
>
> Any one have an opinion, good or bad, re: Corel Linux?
>
Marko
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 08:17:56PM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> Unless you particularly want the Corel package manager, you would be
I do.
> better off with the Storm version - Storm did not do anything
> proprietory to KDE like Corel. The Storm Package Manager is an excellent
I know. And I a
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if anyone was able to get Corel's package manager named
> get_it
> running on a non-Corel installation. Since Corel did change some of
> the KDE
> libraries the other programs included need the Corel Version of
> libkdeui and
> libkdecore I think
Le lun, 22 mai 2000, Dominic Blythe a écrit :
> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> after 1/2 seconds "error 0x10" appear beneath previous message, cdrom spins
>> again, same msg again and again and again
Hi,
Have you tried that same installa
It worked fine for me, but i know a few people who've has this/similar
problem.
no answers though :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 May 2000 17:19
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:
hi with regard to this
Hi,
could anyone help me
muzica writes:
> I read that [Corel Linux} is a collaboration with you.
Corel Linux is derived from Debian and contains a subset of Debian's
packages, but it is not a collaborative effort. The Debian developers
offered to help Corel but were refused.
> When I install Corel on my second partitio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello Debian team,
>
> I read that is a collaboration with you. So I really hope to get help
> regarding
> installation.
>
> I am using P3(450) processsor, 32MB RAM, onboard (integrated) display card and
> others are standard. When I install Corel on my seco
Error messages are always required in these kind of wituations if you
would like an answer that could be of any use to you...
Ron Rademaker
On Mon, 8 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Debian team,
>
> I read that is a collaboration with you. So I really hope to get help
> regar
=?iso-8859-15?Q?Jean-Philippe_Gu=E9rard?= wrote:
> >I am a bit unsure of what you use to access your floppy drive from
> >the Desktop. To access a floppy drive, you probably need to mount it
> >first with "fdmount" or "xvmount".
>
> --
> Jean-Philippe Guérard
> //
and "mount /dev/fd0 /" (but wi
Le 2000-04-24 15:58:40 -0700, Angel M. Hernandez écrivait :
> I'm using Linux OS from Corel and I'm having problems trying to access my
> floppy drive from the Desktop. Please can anyboby help me? Also I would like
> to buy a instructions book, if there is any, about Debian Linux. Thank you.
You
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 11:34, Camilo Alejandro Arboleda wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I was trying the Corel Linux, and I got impressed with the boot look.
>
> Someone had tried the Corel's lilo? Were can I get the source code? I
> looked at corel web site, but I couldn't find it.
You might want to try
Camilo Alejandro Arboleda wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I was trying the Corel Linux, and I got impressed with the boot look.
>
> Someone had tried the Corel's lilo? Were can I get the source code? I
> looked at corel web site, but I couldn't find it.
Try the ftp server(s). It's said that a couple of so
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Chris Mason wrote:
> Yes, I have it and I am going through install-hell.
It's not install-hell; it's all the your life-experience you need to reach
your destiny...
> Actually it installs
> very easily, but Ima trying to get a firewall together and I am having
> problems wit
sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The copy of Storm I had came with xf86 3.3.5. Also, I have found that
> a
> lot of the power user types (myself included) dislike Storm at first
> but
> once they "delamerize" it a bit they really like it a lot.
I agree with Sam on this one. I used Debian, upgraded
The copy of Storm I had came with xf86 3.3.5. Also, I have found that a
lot of the power user types (myself included) dislike Storm at first but
once they "delamerize" it a bit they really like it a lot.
~Sam
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, aphro wrote:
> woulda been nice if storm had updated X before relea
woulda been nice if storm had updated X before releasing. seems like they
are still using 3.3.2.3 (?) none of my videocards work with that :< doh!
of course i only spent about 30 mins trying to install it..
nate
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, sam wrote:
hari >I have tried Corel Linux but I wasn't crazy ab
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/04/00
at 04:19 PM, "massa confusa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have read that corel linux is based on debian. Does anyone on this
>list use it and can they tell me any more about it? Thanks,
>mary
I tried it and returned it in favor or Debian Gnu/Linux pac
It installed beautifully on my Acer notebook. Only needed to load a sound
module. --hans
At 04:19 PM 4/4/00 -0500, massa confusa wrote:
>I have read that corel linux is based on debian. Does anyone on this list
>use it and can they tell me any more about it? Thanks,
>
>mary
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe
yes, it is based on debian. i've used it quite a bit.
here's my take:
naturally, since i am a debian fan, i think it's the greatest of the
"Linux-for-the-Windows-user-who wants-to-try-out-Linux" distribution, though
i try to be unbiased. (based on the ones i've tried... Redhat, Corel, and
Caldera)
I have tried Corel Linux but I wasn't crazy about it. It's very geared
towards the desktop Windows user. I recommend you check out Storm Linux at
www.stormix.com. Storm is also based on Debian but I like the things they
added to it a lot more than what Corel did. I installed it last week and
I've b
Yes, I have it and I am going through install-hell. Actually it installs very
easily, but Ima trying to get a firewall together and I am having problems with
network card install, however, I think I would have the same problems with any
Linux system.
The initial install is easy, the interface is
Vitux wrote (on 28 Mar 00, at 18:20):
> ./xwp: can't load library 'libXpm.so.4'
> Any ideas?
Yeah, been there. You just need to install the corresponding library
from either the X or the oldlibs section, I forget which, of your
Debian release. Try maybe dselect, [S]elect, slash to search, "libX
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 18:20:59 +0200, Vitux wrote:
> ./xwp: can't load library 'libXpm.so.4'
This must be in the mailing list archives. Install the xpm4.7 package from
the oldlibs section of your friendly neigbourhood Debian mirror.
HTH,
Ray
--
RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may not
Yes, you need to install it through apt. I think it's called xlib.so.4 or
something
like that. Scroll through in dselect and you will find it. Install and all
will be
well.
Erik Ryberg
Vitux wrote:
> Hi Deb's
> I installed the tar.gz from Corel's website in /usr/local/WP
> on my Slink-system
> while corel is working on a setup/install program to give a graphical
> front end to debian's install i haven't heard any reports of it being
> completed ..corel has sourcecode and docs for it on their site. i
> dont
> see how you could install debian with a corel front end. unless your
> just
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Lance Wearmouth wrote:
lance >I am a new user of Linux and have not even installed it yet. Have
lance >been around with Windows for a while tho and use NT4 W. I have
lance >obtained distributuib of Debian and also the download cd from Corel.
lance >My intention is to finish u
Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody tried installing the Corel debs from
> ftp://ftp.corel.com/pub/linux/CorelLinux/dists/corellinux-1.0/corel/binary-i386/
> ? I've tried them, but they depend on libapt-pkg2.5, which I can't seem to
> find
> anywhere...
>
> Does anybody know where libap
You'll have to ask that of Corel. Most of us at Debian do not use their tools
to do the actual day-to-day update of our boxen. We use and recommend the tool
called "apt" from the commandline.
Shaul Karl writes:
> What are Corel plans for the future of their Debian venture? Will they
> release updates, Corel-potato, make their release larger etc?
I haven't the foggiest idea what their plans are. They are very secretive.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisc
> Randy Edwards writes:
> > I'm working up a default reply now that points people to Corel's support
> > newsgroups...or should we instead work to bring those folks away from the
> > dark side? :-)
>
> I consider them all new Debian users.
What are Corel plans for the future of their Debian ventu
Randy Edwards writes:
> I'm working up a default reply now that points people to Corel's support
> newsgroups...or should we instead work to bring those folks away from the
> dark side? :-)
I consider them all new Debian users.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elm
> actually sounds kinda scary.
Flashback to when AOL entered the Internet?! :-)
I dunno, I'm working up a default reply now that points people to Corel's
support newsgroups...or should we instead work to bring those folks away
from the dark side? :-)
--
Regards,| Debian G
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Randy Edwards wrote:
redwar > This ought to be interesting, because as Corel establishes itself I'm
redwar >sure we'll be dealing with more and more Corel users here in
Debian-User...
maybe a good time to unsubscribe ? ;)
actually sounds kinda scary.
nate
---
Joe Block wrote:
>
> When I did the install on my friend's laptop, the first thing I did
> after corel's install was done was add my local mirror of slink,
> security.debian.org, the y2k updates & the XFree86 3.3.5 to its
> sources.list and update & upgrade.
I went ahead and did a Corel to sli
Randy Edwards wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried taking the freebie Corel Linux install and upgrading it to
> slink?
>
> I saw that Corel left the slink entries commented out in
> /etc/apt/sources.list and was curious as to what would go on if someone did
> an update and an apt-get dist-upgrade. I've b
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Randy Edwards wrote:
redwar >I saw that Corel left the slink entries commented out in
redwar >/etc/apt/sources.list and was curious as to what would go on if someone
did
redwar >an update and an apt-get dist-upgrade. I've been playing with the idea
of
redwar >testing it her
Randy Edwards wrote:
> Has anyone tried taking the freebie Corel Linux install and upgrading it to
> slink?
That's pretty pointless. Corel linux *is* slink with a very few changes,
most of which are upgrades. Thus, there is nothing in slink to upgrade to.
Please see http://www.debian.org/News/week
WordPerfect needs the libc5 version of libXpm.so.4. Install the xpm4.7
package.
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 10:22:51AM +0300, Alex V. Toropov wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've got problem when try to run WordPerfect for linux
>
> It claimes that it cann't find libXpm.so.4 library.
>
> when I try to use ldd
I'd guess that corel doesn't install the source by default...?
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
>Please forgive if this is a newbie type question, but I can't seem to
>find the path to the source directory to recompile my kernel for the
>Corel/Deb distribution.
>
>
>
--
==
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Sven Esbjerg wrote:
joker >Well all the GNU/Linux stuff will have to be GPL and it is. The rest is
under
joker >a Mozilla-like license that Corel made up. It's pretty much free. I think
joker >Debian developers should take a look at it, notice the good parts and
try to
joker
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 03:45:00PM -0800, aphro wrote:
> anytime soon..i doubt corel is up to releasing it as GPL. chances are low
Well all the GNU/Linux stuff will have to be GPL and it is. The rest is under
a Mozilla-like license that Corel made up. It's pretty much free. I think
Debian develop
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Charles Lewis wrote:
lewisc >Anyone know what kind of effect corel is having on debian? Is their
distro
lewisc >debian or not? What are the major differences? Corel apparently touts a
3
lewisc >step, user friendly installation. Does this mean that debian itself will
lewisc >
I only got beta 2 of corel linux (oct 22 1999 build) it appears that it
may be compadible with slink package wise, although it seems QUITE limited
in terms of binary packages compared to slink.. i was and still am very
dissapointed with their lack of selection for applications. and fear that
their
Nick Wesselman wrote:
> What exactly does it mean if a distribution is "based on" Debian? Would any
> packages created for debian work with it?
Well they should unless Corel messes up the packages they modify, or package
incompatable library versions.
> Are new releases "created" when
> new rew r
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 08:01:29PM -0700, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On Tue 09/21/99 09:45PM, Phil Brutsche wrote:
>
> > Corel's been trying to release a beta of their distro under terms that
> > violates the GPL (no redistribution what-so-ever, etc). Needless to say,
> > a real mess has come about it.
On Tue 09/21/99 09:45PM, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> Corel's been trying to release a beta of their distro under terms that
> violates the GPL (no redistribution what-so-ever, etc). Needless to say,
> a real mess has come about it. The person Bruce talked to is trying to
> change that.
>
I just read
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote:
[snip]
> Please forgive my ignorance, or lack of attention to earlier
> threads, but what's he working on?
Corel's been trying to release a beta of their distro under terms that
violates the GPL (no redistribution what-so-ever, etc). Needless to say,
a real
Hi Bruce,
On Wed 09/22/99 01:02AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I spoke with a Corel official today - he had hoped to have a policy change
> announcement today but ran out of time. He committed that he has been assigned
> the problem, he really is working on it, and he said that I can tell people
>
*- On 31 Jul, Paul wrote about "Re: Corel Wordperfect nightmare"
> Phil Dyer wrote:
>>
>> Paul wrote:
>> > First I was told that I didn`t have "libm.so.5" so the graphical
>> > Installer wouldn`t work, then a load of error messages saying &qu
Phil Dyer wrote:
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> >
> > First I was told that I didn`t have "libm.so.5" so the graphical
> > Installer wouldn`t work, then a load of error messages saying "wp.No
> > such file or directory" Finally it askes me for an installation
> > directory so I type in /usr or
> > /hom
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Phil Dyer wrote:
> Paul wrote:
>
> >
> > First I was told that I didn`t have "libm.so.5" so the graphical
> > Installer wouldn`t work, then a load of error messages saying "wp.No
> > such file or directory" Finally it askes me for an installation
> >
Paul wrote:
>
> First I was told that I didn`t have "libm.so.5" so the graphical
> Installer wouldn`t work, then a load of error messages saying "wp.No
> such file or directory" Finally it askes me for an installation
> directory so I type in /usr or
> /home and it says "invalid directory" an
"Arjen v. V." wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've heard that Corel is preparing to launch a new Distibution, with the
> coöperation of Debian and KDE.
> Does anybody know anything more about that?
A preview will be shown in August 10th -12th in Linux World, followed by a beta
in
early September, and a ful
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
: >- I don't remember other reasons but GNOME is greater !
: >
: We could argue that... ;)
Please do so somewhere other than debian-user.
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
> [ etc. deleted ]
>
Please stop right here! If you don't understand it then just keep
quiet instead of provoking yet another flame war on this subject.
Corel made a choice with regards to mak
In a message dated 4/22/99 3:27:48 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
> KDE is not free or not fully free.
As stated in the release that came out a few days ago - it had to do with the
fact that KDE has been aroun
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Philip Lehman wrote:
> How enlightening. KDE bashing is pretty trendy at the moment, isn't
> it?
i think it'll be nice to have the choice of either. commercial adoption
of debian as a base can only lead to good things, i think (judging by what
corel's saying).
> Please, let
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
> KDE is not free or not fully free.
> It's worse than Gnome :
> - it takes more memory
> - it's not GTK ( I'm a GTk fan)
> - I will have less apps because Gnome is newer and
Oh, no. Let's not start another GNOME-vs-KDE thread. Please!
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 08:47:47PM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> I don't understand why Corel has chosen KDE instead of Gnome.
[ Rest deleted ]
> > take a peak at this, http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,35166,00.html
> >
> > excerpt,
> >
> > Corel will base a Linux product based on the version of Linux from
> > Debian. Though Debian's Linux can be purchased at many sites, Debian
> > is a non-profit organization
>
Boy, I can already hear
> take a peak at this, http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,35166,00.html
>
> excerpt,
>
> Corel will base a Linux product based on the version of Linux from
> Debian. Though Debian's Linux can be purchased at many sites, Debian
> is a non-profit organization
So perhaps Corel is doing what many of
My WP8 installation is up and working.
Herein a few cautions are passed along, learned during setting up on my
Dell Inspiron Laptop, which is a dual boot Win95 & Linux.
1) Do gunzip and tar -xvf the files in some Linux directory like /tmp
Unpacking in a DOS/Win95 partition is inadequate because a
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Ashok Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> I had the same problem with WP 8.0. When installing the first time, I
> had not selected any printer, because I did not find a printer driver
> that matched my printer (BJC 4200). The installation completed without
> any problems, but on trying to
Hm. The first time I tried to install I was #4 to download. It
installed but wouldn't correctly run. It would complain about missing some
file that it copied into one of its directories. Sorry, don't remember for
sure which one.
And then I tried to reinstall. I also upped my kernel from 2.0.34
I had the same problem with WP 8.0. When installing the first time, I
had not selected any printer, because I did not find a printer driver
that matched my printer (BJC 4200). The installation completed without
any problems, but on trying to run xwp, I got the floating point
exception message.
Wel
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, buns wrote:
> I am getting the Floating Point Exception error message when I try to
> run xwp. Any idea why?
As I told some time ago I had the same problem with the earlier demo
version. Anyone has any idea, why?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> In netscape something popped up and disappeared so fast I was unable to
> read it. I kept trying and eventually got there. I assume it was a
> message saying that the maximum number of users had been reached. The
> site must be VERY busy as I'm getting
Now what we need is a debian installer package for this just like the
one for netscape or star office. Something that will set up the menu
system, environmental variables, paths etc
(I ended up with /usr/local/bin/wpbin/)
_
DO YOU YAHOO!?
kenneth collaborated,
>> The runme asks if you've untarred things, and decides there's nothign
>> new to do if you say yes. If you say no, it untars, but still doesn't
>> do anything. The executables end up in ./linux/bin
>> I assume there's some option i'm missing to figure out to tell it t
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
