csanyi...@gmail.com writes:
> Gary Dale writes:
>
>> On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>> I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
>>> Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
>>>
>>> But this kernel doesn't have support for
Gary Dale writes:
> On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
>> Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
>>
>> But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module.
>>
>> One
On 17/01/15 10:19 AM, csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a headless powerpc box and run on it Debian Wheezy with kernel
Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux .
But this kernel doesn't have support for the rtl8192cu kernel-module.
One can to get the kernel source fr
The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present
with Wheezy 486 on same computer.
Thanks
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1383829602.35782
The same problem, with kernel 3.10, was present
with Wheezy 486 on same computer.
Thanks
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1383828867.2
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 15:07:58 -0500 (EST), Antispammbox-debian wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I try compiling kernel 3.10 on Squeeze 6.0.7. with cpu
> Intel Centrino1 32bit.
>
> Unpack source in /usr/src, and:
> adduser user src
> chown -R root:src /usr/src
> chmod -R g+w /usr/src
>
> cp /boot/config-`
Sorry, my mistake, nothing about 64 bit. I compiled the 32bit kernel in xfs.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds
wrote:
> I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default.
> How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a
> non-fixed si
I am using debian unstable 64 bit with lvm and ext3. All options are default.
How did I find out? This OS is a VM. And the disk data is in a
non-fixed size file, not compressed. Sorry I forgot how to say this in
English, by non-fixed size, I mean the VM software just allocate the
actual disk space
On 27/06/10 10:51 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> Thank you guys.
> I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It
> seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB,
> but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space
> was just empty
On Monday 28 June 2010 12:12:23 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> So I guess we're still looking for an example of a non-English name
> that can't be pronounced right. Can't think of any.
It isn't a case of whether it can be correctly pronounced, but of whether it
is.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:20:05 -0400 (EDT), Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am no
Op 28-06-10 13:12, Tzafrir Cohen schreef:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>>
>>> PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
>>> country. Some people cannot pronounce my name righ
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:44:15AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>
> > PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> > country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> > pseudonym.
>
> That does
On Monday 28 June 2010 08:44:15 Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> > PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> > country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> > pseudonym.
>
> That doesn't stop me fro
On Lu, 28 iun 10, 10:51:02, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> PS: Certainly this is not my real name. 8-) I am not from an English
> country. Some people cannot pronounce my name right. So I use this
> pseudonym.
That doesn't stop me from using my real name ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussio
Thank you guys.
I have not follow Stephen's guide, but I figured the reason out. It
seems like an ext3's fault. The space (i-node wise) was used 5.x GB,
but the actual space (data wise) was used only 1 GB. So a lot of space
was just empty and wasted.
I attached another disk to get the job done.
PS
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:34:29 -0400 (EDT), Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read
>>
>>http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
>>
>> Kernel building in Debian is a complex task fraught with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/25/2010 09:10 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Magicloud Magiclouds? That can't be your real name!
> Can't you give us your real name? At least a first name?
>
> That is not the correct command syntax. I suggest that you read
>
>http://www.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:55:41 -0400 (EDT), Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
>
> I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34 kernel.
> Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image
> linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source directory took 6GB space,
> made t
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 18:25, Magicloud Magiclouds <
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using debian unstable 64. Recently I wanted to compile a 2.6.34
> kernel.
> Well, the source package is 64MB. Before `make-kpkg linux-image
> linux-headers --initrd` finished, the source dir
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:11:08AM -0500, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
>> Yes. In addition, I would highly recommend using kernel-package to
>> compile your kernel to generate a deb. Here's a nice primer:
>>
>> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
>
> I would recommend using the 'make-kp
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote:
I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand
2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was
made by hand, starting from the default configuration and
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 06:59:48AM -0700, deb...@toursbymexico.com wrote:
> I have a doubt about kernel compilation. Two days ago I compiled by hand
> 2.6.31.6 and it crashed during the boot process. The configuration was
> made by hand, starting from the default configuration and perhaps I missed
Mario de Frutos wrote:
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my 2.6.14.2 kernel in my server to a 2.6.17.4 or
> higher using my current .config. There isn't any problem in compiling
> time and in grub i put the same config but with different "vmlinuz"
> file, but when i reboot i get a kernel panic error like t
shahim essaid.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want
> to compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under
> Documentation/Changes are not satisfied under Sarge. udev, for example,
> has to be 071 or higher.
I've neve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 01:23:20PM -0700, shahim essaid.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am somewhat new to Debian and Iam not sure if this is possible. I want to
> compile a 2.6.16 from source but the minimum requirement listed under
> Documentation/Chan
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:51:55AM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
> lemme see if I understand what you meant: The kernel-source files that I
> downloaded is common to all linux distribution while the kernel-header
> files is particular to a certain version and distribution.
...not so much the
me out,
Amish
- Original Message -
From: "Almut Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: compiling kernel module question
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to comp
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:36:26PM -0500, Amish Rughoonundon wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to compile and insert a simple kernel module but
> without luck. This is what I did.
> Since the freshly installed debian sarge 3.1 distro did not have any
> source files under /usr/src, I di uname -a to
On 9/22/05, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote:> I have found the problem with debian apt-get kernel which contains> debian patches.Debian shipped kernels don't come with with bootsplash patch include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
L.V.Gandhi on Monday 19 Sep 2005 12:46 wrote:
> On 9/17/05, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't know whether this is a stupid doubt, but are you using
>> `pristine' kernel sources or Debian patched kernel sources (apt-got
>> ones)?
On 9/17/05, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know whether this is a stupid doubt, but are you using
> `pristine' kernel sources or Debian patched kernel sources (apt-got
> ones)? I generally have had no problems applying the bootsplash
> patches to pristine kernel sources.
I hav
David R. Litwin wrote:
Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is
dual-boot and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting
Down every Evening. In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon. (By
the bye, why doesn't Debian have Bootsplash as a standard?)
I
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 05:38:03AM +0530, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
>I have 2.6.8 kernel source. I tried the following both patches separately
>in the same order. ie second time src previous patched source was deleted
>and new src was installed.
>bootsplash-3.1.6-2.6.8.diff
>bootsplash-
On 9/14/05, Pooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2005/9/6, mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> | Basically, the steps are:> |> | 1. Download the kernel source> |> | 2. Extract it to /usr/src, or wherever you'd prefer
> |> | 3. Download the bootsplash patch from http://www.bootsplash.de/files/> |> | 4. 'cd'
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:06:10 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is this boot-icons package. I don't have in stable repository.
Hmmm, I guess boot-icons never made it out of unstable.
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=boot-icon&searchon=names&subword
2005/9/6, mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot
> and
> | > the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every
On 9/14/05, Seeker5528 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:01:47 +0530"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > On a side note I had installed the boot-icons package sometime in the
> > past and never got around to getting it operational and it started> > working too.> >> > I install
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:01:47 +0530
"L.V.Gandhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On a side note I had installed the boot-icons package sometime in the
> > past and never got around to getting it operational and it started
> > working too.
> >
> > I installed it. It shows tux image. No show of % pro
On 9/13/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The link I provide let me set up Splashy with relative ease. I should
think, off hand, that you need to edit the config.xml file located in
the splashy directory. Read the readme that comes along with your theme.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthr
David R. Litwin wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The only reason I was dragged in was that I fell for your
> > troll.
>
> Did you mean MY troll? I hope that what I have written does not appear to be
> a troll! I'm just asking questions: I'm very curious. I'm terribly sorry if
> I sound mean. I'm r
The link I provide let me set up Splashy with relative ease. I should think, off hand, that you need to edit the config.xml file located in the splashy directory. Read the readme that comes along with your theme.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=41709
I
installed it. It shows tux image. No
On 9/10/05, Seeker5528 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:55:31 -0700Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> what about using splashy? it doesn't require a kernel rebuild and is in> experimental or you can add:
>> deb http://splashy.Alioth.debian.org/debian/ unstable main> deb-sr
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:55:31 -0700
Jeff D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about using splashy? it doesn't require a kernel rebuild and is in
> experimental or you can add:
>
> deb http://splashy.Alioth.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
> deb-src http://splashy.Alioth.debian.org/debian/
The only reason I was dragged in was that I fell for yourtroll.
Did you mean MY troll? I hope that what I have written does not appear to be a troll! I'm just asking questions: I'm very curious. I'm terribly sorry if I sound mean. I'm really not terribly good at writing E-Mails.
-- —A watched bread
Brian Nelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
> >> I find it easiest to just grab the vanilla sources straight from
> >> kernel.org. The Debian ones tend to be crippled and patched, which
> >> makes it a pain to apply new patches.
> >
> > I always find it easier to use the Debian st
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot
and
| > the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every
Evening.
| > In addition, I shall be getting a lap
David R. Litwin wrote:
Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot
and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every
Evening. In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon. (By the bye, why
doesn't Debian have Bootsplash as a standard?)
w
Isn't this perhaps the problem? I've been trying to get to gripswith debian for years and I haven't ventured outside stable. I
still feel out of my depth and - no offence meant, honestly -you're obviously out of your depth and you shouldn't think youhave the right to demand answers to all your qu
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Alvin used the keyboard to craft this:
>|bad boy ...
>|
>|i asume you do know, that your system is statisticly more likely
>|to die exponentionally each time you reboot your PC.. the more
>|you reboot it, the lifespan of your machine just wend down
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:51:46PM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> I'm using Sid
Isn't this perhaps the problem? I've been trying to get to grips
with debian for years and I haven't ventured outside stable. I
still feel out of my depth and - no offence meant, honestly -
you're obviously out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) writes:
>> I find it easiest to just grab the vanilla sources straight from
>> kernel.org. The Debian ones tend to be crippled and patched, which
>> makes it a pain to apply new patches.
>
> I always find it easier to use the Debian stock kernels. They have
> all o
You don't need grub to use linux, lilo can be used instead. I prefer lilo togrub.
I actually started my Linux days with LILO. I like GRUB more.
IMHO, grub is too flexible.If I may: Huh? How can some thing be too flexible? This is most interesting.-- —A watched bread-crumb never boils.—My hover-cra
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:51:46PM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
snip...
> Also, one good-man mentioned that I would need to configure GRUB when I
> install the kernel. Every time I have apt-got a linux-image, it says it is
> searching for GRUB and modifying it accordingly (and, in fact, also for
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> My appologies: I really, really want Bootsplash.
than you be able to make it work "yourself", as it is tons of work
> As I wrote (and so alluded to), my computer IS re-booted quite a bit.
bad boy ...
i asume you do know, that your system is st
All was going well until:$ make xconfig** Unable to find the QT installation. Please make sure that the* QT development package is correctly installed and the QTDIR* environment variable is set to the correct location.
*make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/.tmp_qtcheck] Error 1make: *** [xconfig] Error 2I
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> not using HTML...
Well, what did you expect? You're using evocrap as a MUA.
Switch to something decent that actually allows you to control which part
of a correctly-formatted rich-text message (ie including both HTML and
Brian Nelson wrote:
> "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is
> > dual-boot and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B:
> > Shutting Down every Evening.
But the other user will never see bootsplash. You booting li
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
[snip]
>
> Any way, have you any advice to get me closer to me goal of
> Bootsplashedness?
>
You might find this url helpful:
http://hacks.oreilly.com/pub/h/3124
FWIW, I've got bootsplash here working fine on a 2.6.11 kernel but I
canno
"David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot and
> the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every Evening.
> In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon. (By the bye, why doesn't
> Debian have Bo
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> Any way, have you any advice
not using HTML...
--
Administration & Formation à l'administration
de serveurs dédiés:
http://www.google.fr/search?q=aspo+infogerance+serveur
No one *needs*bootsplash.My appologies: I really, really want Bootsplash.
> (By the bye, why doesn't Debian have Bootsplash as a standard?)Is there some particular reason it should? Most people actually *use* the
computer rather than rebooting it over and over and over and over...As I wrote (and
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:48:25PM -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> Before I go any further, yes, I need bootsplash: My computer is dual-boot
> and the other user insists on A: Using Windows and B: Shutting Down every
> Evening. In addition, I shall be getting a lap-top soon.
What do any of those
Sorav Bansal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There is a curious thing that I noticed in the kernel. The kernel does
> not compile if you remove the -O2 flag in the Makefile. It gives an error
> in an ASM directive mentioning that a register is being spilled.
The x86 has a very few reg
S.D.A. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 05:43:39PM -0400 or thereabouts, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Werner Mahr wrote:
Or shorter: make dep bzImage modules modules_install This will make the Steps
one by one, and if one fails the other will fail also.
The Debian way is much easier:
http://newbiedoc.s
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 05:43:39PM -0400 or thereabouts, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Werner Mahr wrote:
> >Or shorter: make dep bzImage modules modules_install This will make the Steps
> >one by one, and if one fails the other will fail also.
> >
>
> The Debian way is much easier:
>
> http://newbie
Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 23:43 schrieb Roberto Sanchez:
> Werner Mahr wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 20:04 schrieb Sebastiaan:
> >>Then it's a simple make dep && make bzImage && make modules && make
> >>modules_install
> >
> > Or shorter: make dep bzImage modules modules_install
> > This wil
Werner Mahr wrote:
Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 20:04 schrieb Sebastiaan:
Then it's a simple make dep && make bzImage && make modules && make
modules_install
Or shorter: make dep bzImage modules modules_install
This will make the Steps one by one, and if one fails the other will fail
also.
The D
Am Sonntag, 4. April 2004 20:04 schrieb Sebastiaan:
> Then it's a simple make dep && make bzImage && make modules && make
> modules_install
Or shorter: make dep bzImage modules modules_install
This will make the Steps one by one, and if one fails the other will fail
also.
--
MfG usw.
Werner M
Michael Satterwhite wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
seems missing to me.
There is ample documentation on configuring the kernel, but I don't see the
issue of the starting point addressed anywhere.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 04 April 2004 13:36, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> You _could_ do this, but I recommend very highly compiling the kernel "the
> Debian way." It takes care of all the little details missing any one of
> which might leave you with a hosed system!
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 at 8:04pm, Sebastiaan wrote:
:High,
Not just at the moment; maybe later :)
:On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
:
:> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
:> Hash: SHA1
:>
:> I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
:> seems missin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 04 April 2004 13:04, Sebastiaan wrote:
> High,
>
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and
> > something
High,
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
> seems missing to me.
>
> There is ample documentation on configuring the kernel, but I don't see the
> issue
> That's what make oldconfig is for. cp the stock config from /boot,
> and continue from there. You should be prompted for new changes but
> anything in the old kernel will be selected by default.
>
and you can also load that .config file from make menuconfig/xconfig too,
and make whatever change
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:18:13PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
> seems missing to me.
>
>From Debian Reference:
# apt-get install debhelper modutils kernel
> If you have a working kernel, however, it seems far more logical to use its
> configuration as a starting point and make the changes relative to that. In
> SuSE, there are good instructions on getting this starting point, but I don't
> see anything like that in Debian. I *DO* see a config file i
Incoming from Michael Satterwhite:
> I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
> seems missing to me.
>
> There is ample documentation on configuring the kernel, but I don't see the
> issue of the starting point addressed anywhere. It seems to be assumed that
On 4/4/2004 1:30 PM, Rajesh Menon wrote:
there isn't really a specified place to find the .config of your last
kernel build. usually, when you finish configuring and save the config, it
will be present in the kernel src dir.
i don't have any .config under /boot cos i build them in my /home and sav
there isn't really a specified place to find the .config of your last
kernel build. usually, when you finish configuring and save the config, it
will be present in the kernel src dir.
i don't have any .config under /boot cos i build them in my /home and save
em under one folder.
so, if you did a k
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:18:13PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been looking at the documentation for compiling the kernel, and something
> seems missing to me.
>
> There is ample documentation on configuring the kernel, but I don't
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:36:23PM +, James Hosken wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux$ make xconfig
> make[1]: `scripts/fixdep' is up to date.
> *
> * Unable to find the QT installation. Please make sure that the
> * QT development package is correctly installed and the QTDIR
> * env
Hello
James Hosken (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm working my way through the "Creating custom kernels with Debian's
> kernel-package system" from
>
>http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/kernel-pkg/config-kernel-pkg.html.en
>
> When I get to make xconfig I get the error
>
>
> [EMAIL P
Monique Y. Herman said:
> You might also look into distcc, which allows you to run the compile
> across multiple computers.
>
> Oh, wait, just reread - the above won't help with harddrive space =/
> but it's still a really cool tool.
>
> --
> monique
i never could get distcc to work, anyone have a
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 at 12:04 GMT, Piers Kittel penned:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've got an ancient 486 which needs its kernel recompiled, but it is
> > extremely slow, and the hard drive isn't big enough - and I think it's
> > possible to recompile the kernel on my main PC and transfer the kerne
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 at 12:04 GMT, Piers Kittel penned:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got an ancient 486 which needs its kernel recompiled, but it is
> extremely slow, and the hard drive isn't big enough - and I think it's
> possible to recompile the kernel on my main PC and transfer the kernel
> and modul
Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got an ancient 486 which needs its kernel recompiled, but it is
> extremely slow, and the hard drive isn't big enough - and I think it's
> possible to recompile the kernel on my main PC and transfer the kernel
> and modules over - how to do this?
Bu
GCS wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:59:20PM -0700, Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sure wish debian had a secure version of the kernel; a binary version of
grsecurity would add a huge amount of security.
Anyone know why Debian does not have this in the main archive? At least
a grsecur
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:59:20PM -0700, Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sure wish debian had a secure version of the kernel; a binary version of
> grsecurity would add a huge amount of security.
Anyone know why Debian does not have this in the main archive? At least
a grsecurity patc
GCS said:
> But no other problem really. Anyway, I _do agree with you strongly_:
> 2.6.0 is not for widespread yet. I will switch at ~2.6.10 on my servers,
> depending the fixes get in by that time. Until then I use
> 2.4.23+grsecurity.
You are on my same wavelength.
I thought I was the only perso
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:52:26AM -0700, Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, I have many machines, three of them running with kernel 2.6.0,
> > compiled with gcc 3.3; no problems.
> What a man, I'm not touching 2.6.0 until it's in the 10 release.
I agree with you. 2.6.0 still has
GCS said:
>> Stable gcc for stable kernel, and testing gcc for testing kernel?
> ? There's no such relationship.
>
>> I've done 2.4.22 with gcc 3.2.3 (gcc testing) and it appeared to work
>> correctly.
> 3.2.3 is _not_ a test version of gcc. There's a newer one, fe I have
> 3.3.3 installed. Ple
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 01:57:38AM -0700, Lucas Albers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stable gcc for stable kernel, and testing gcc for testing kernel?
? There's no such relationship.
> I've done 2.4.22 with gcc 3.2.3 (gcc testing) and it appeared to work
> correctly.
3.2.3 is _not_ a test version
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 09:46, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> Yeah, I figured that out after looking at the dependency list of
> the kernel-packages. I'm wondering though if using gcc3.3 would
> have any impact (since everything else on the stable system would
> have the programs compiled with gcc
Colin Watson wrote:
> The kernel doesn't use the libc, so I expect that this is a red herring.
> (I don't know the real answer, though.)
Yeah, I figured that out after looking at the dependency list of the
kernel-packages. I'm wondering though if using gcc3.3 would have any
impact (since everyth
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:29:51PM +0100, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> My server runs Debian stable, while my workstation runs Debian testing.
> Since the server is a slower machine, I would like to create the kernel
> package on my workstation and install the deb package on my server.
> Is this poss
On Monday 08 December 2003 00:59, Bill Goudie wrote:
> The unresolved symbols still exist -- depmod is run with "-q"
> from /etc/init.d/modutils. This suppresses the error warnings.
Well, what I did was run this from the command line:
# depmod -a
Even this:
# depmod -a -e
And it doesn't complai
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 05:37:16PM -0600, Bill Goudie wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 December 2003 23:11, Bill Goudie wrote:
> > > The upshot of all this is that modules with unresolved symbols
> > > require functions which were exclude
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
> On Sunday 07 December 2003 23:11, Bill Goudie wrote:
> > The upshot of all this is that modules with unresolved symbols
> > require functions which were excluded from both the kernel and any
> > other installed modules for that k
On Sunday 07 December 2003 23:11, Bill Goudie wrote:
> The upshot of all this is that modules with unresolved symbols
> require functions which were excluded from both the kernel and any
> other installed modules for that kernel version. If for some
> reason you built this module but don't need it
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
