cc. to commun...@debian.org because I'm explaining CT involvment.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:47:51PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > Posting well-intentioned private repl
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Posting well-intentioned private replies back to the list is not
> > appropriate.
>
> Please clarify how the Debian Community Team wishes us to respond to the
> following u
I'm not Andrew, and can't answer for Andrew or for anyone on the
Debian Community Team, but my take on this is:
On 21 Dec 2023 15:49 -0800, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Posting well-intentioned private replies back to the lis
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:59:26PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
Clarification, please. Occasionally a miss-configured mail reader will
cause a private off-list reply, which the correspondent does not notice.
My usual response to that sort of thing is to suggest that the
correspondent fix his mail
4 matches
Mail list logo
