Re: SOLVED Re: CPU time

2007-02-03 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Frank McCormick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:42:08 -0500 Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:11:08 -0500 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at

SOLVED Re: CPU time

2007-02-03 Thread Frank McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:42:08 -0500 Frank McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:11:08 -0500 > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at

Re: CPU time

2007-02-02 Thread Frank McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:11:08 -0500 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > > > > > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25 > > > > percent of

Re: CPU time

2007-02-02 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:00 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:33:05 -0500 > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > > > I accidentally dis

Re: CPU time

2007-02-01 Thread Frank McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:33:05 -0500 Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > > > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25 > > percent of cpu time when

Re: CPU time

2007-02-01 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > I accidentally discovered this morning that Xorg is taking up 25 > percent of cpu time when at idle. Is this normal or should I file a bug? > > I'm running Etch. I suppose it depends on what kind of box you're running. I haven'