Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 14 May 2010 14:56:28 Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-05-14 21:36 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > Typing 'aptitude-curses' is a little annoying. I'm assuming the rename > > is because of work on aptitude-gtk and aptitude-qt. If so, wouldn't > > using the alternatives system for an

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-14 21:50 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Friday 14 May 2010 14:36:44 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> Does it annoy anyone else that the 'aptitude' package no longer provides an >> 'aptitude' binary? >> >> Typing 'aptitude-curses' is a little annoying. I'm assuming the renam

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 14 May 2010 14:50:07 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > I initially installed 0.4.11.11-1~lenny1 on this system, but have since > upgraded to 0.6.1.5-3. Is there a good way for me to establish an > alternative that will not mess up on the next upgrade? Or, is this > problem supposedly fi

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-14 21:36 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Does it annoy anyone else that the 'aptitude' package no longer provides an > 'aptitude' binary? Not me: , | % readlink -f =aptitude | /usr/bin/aptitude-curses ` > Typing 'aptitude-curses' is a little annoying. I'm assuming th

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Mark Allums
On 5/14/2010 2:36 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: Does it annoy anyone else that the 'aptitude' package no longer provides an 'aptitude' binary? Yes, that kind of thing bugs me to no end. I think a package should give me what I expect. (Within reason.) MAA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 14 May 2010 14:36:44 -0500 "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote: > Does it annoy anyone else that the 'aptitude' package no longer provides an > 'aptitude' binary? > > Typing 'aptitude-curses' is a little annoying. I'm assuming the rename is > because of work on aptitude-gtk and aptitude-qt

Re: Aptitude From Testing

2010-05-14 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 14 May 2010 14:36:44 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Does it annoy anyone else that the 'aptitude' package no longer provides an > 'aptitude' binary? > > Typing 'aptitude-curses' is a little annoying. I'm assuming the rename is > because of work on aptitude-gtk and aptitude-qt. If so,