On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 08:56:05 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 02 Jun 2025 at 10:33:57 (+0200), Frank Guthausen wrote:
> >
> > From some old legacy configuration [...]
> > ``Aptitude::Recommends-Important'' [...]
> >
> > The manpage [...] claims the
> > option to be `` APT::Install-Recommends''
On Mon 02 Jun 2025 at 10:33:57 (+0200), Frank Guthausen wrote:
> I use ``aptitude'' with configuration below ``/etc/apt/''.
>
> From some old legacy configuration and an online manpage[1] recommended
> packages are included or excluded by ``Aptitude::Recommends-Important''
> option when using ``ap
On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:33:57 +0200
Frank Guthausen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I use ``aptitude'' with configuration below ``/etc/apt/''.
>
> From some old legacy configuration and an online manpage[1]
> recommended packages are included or excluded by
> ``Aptitude::Recommends-Important'' option when us
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 16:37:53 Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:37:46 -0600
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> > For now, setting 'Aptitude::UI::Package-Display-Format' to "%x%a%M %p
> > (%t) %Z %v %V" is passable, and can be made better with the features
> > already supported by apti
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:37:46 -0600
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
...
> For now, setting 'Aptitude::UI::Package-Display-Format' to "%x%a%M %p (%t) %Z
> %v %V" is passable, and can be made better with the features already
> supported
> by aptitude.
What's '%x', and why isn't it in the Aptitud
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:38:59 Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:29:54AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> > I was hoping to be able to get something like:
>> > --\ Versions of e2fsprogs (2)
>> > i A
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 14:38:59 Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:29:54AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > I was hoping to be able to get something like:
> > --\ Versions of e2fsprogs (2)
> > i A 1.41.3-1 (now, stable)
> > p A 1.41.9-1 (testing, unstable)
> >
> > or, a
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:29:54AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20091201002006.ga9...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:34:11PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
[snip]
>
> (the last two)
>
> I was hoping to be able to
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 08:21:01 Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:45:26AM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> > Daniel, would you be terribly averse to a wishlist bug to make a separate
> > configuration option for this?
>
> No. The whole way that the lis
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:45:26AM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Daniel, would you be terribly averse to a wishlist bug to make a separate
> configuration option for this?
No. The whole way that the lists are configured could probably use
an overhaul, actually. I wrote
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:29:54AM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> However, the lines I'd like to change look like:
> --\ Versions of e2fsprogs (2)
> i A 1.41.3-1
> p A 1.41.9-1
For package versions, "%p" turns into the version number; "%v" and
"%V" don't display anythi
In <200912010129.54945@iguanasuicide.net>, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>In <20091201002006.ga9...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>>On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:34:11PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
>
> was heard to say:
>>> I use a mixed system, partially documented at
>>> On
In <20091201002006.ga9...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:34:11PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> I use a mixed system, partially documented at
>> On all of them, it would be quite nice if aptitude would give me just a
>> /little _bi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:34:11PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> I use a mixed system, partially documented at
> On all of them, it would be quite nice if aptitude would give me just a
> /little _bit_/ more information about which archive a particular package
> version wa
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 08:35:22AM -0500, Jude DaShiell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> What can I put into the .aptituderc file to adjust aptitude so the
> recommended downloads and suggested downloads get downloaded with an
> aptitude dist-upgrade?
Because of the design of apt, it's
Jude DaShiell([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> What can I put into the .aptituderc file to adjust aptitude so the
> recommended downloads and suggested downloads get downloaded with an
> aptitude dist-upgrade?
The aptitude man page (-r) option says you recommends options in
/etc/ap
16 matches
Mail list logo
