Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
>
> > >I've had a similar problem. Switched to nut, and that seems to be
> > >working just fine for me. I have a Smart-UPS 620 with smart cable.
> >
> > I haven't received any reply from the apcupsd debian developer.
> > Does anyone
You might try the nut mailing list. Usually it is very helpful and backed up
by upstream. The address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
>
> > >I've had a similar problem. Switched to nut, and that seems to be
> > >working j
On Fri, 2001-09-14 at 02:34, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> >
> > > >I've had a similar problem. Switched to nut, and that seems to be
> > > >working just fine for me. I have a Smart-UPS 620 with smart cable.
> >
>
> I'm having proble
Dean A. Roman wrote (on 14 Sep 2001 at 0:34):
> Maybe somebody can send there working config files so that I
can try
> them. I'm running an APC Smart-UPS 700.
I'm running the same one, and I tested the shutdown recently. (I
had to rebuild the system after a disk controller failure.) I'll
be
Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
>
> > >I've had a similar problem. Switched to nut, and that seems to be
> > >working just fine for me. I have a Smart-UPS 620 with smart cable.
>
I'm having problems with nut right now. The command "upsc" which I guess is
supposed
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> >I've had a similar problem. Switched to nut, and that seems to be
> >working just fine for me. I have a Smart-UPS 620 with smart cable.
>
> I haven't received any reply from the apcupsd debian developer.
> Does anyone know if he still works on this pac
>On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:46:49PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>>
>> "Greg Wiley" wrote:
>>
>> > I don't use apcupsd but in order to get the machine to respond
>> > to poweroff, I must append "apm=on" to the kernel params on
>> > startup. The kernel turns off power management by default eve
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:46:49PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> "Greg Wiley" wrote:
>
> > I don't use apcupsd but in order to get the machine to respond
> > to poweroff, I must append "apm=on" to the kernel params on
> > startup. The kernel turns off power management by default even
> > t
"Greg Wiley" wrote:
> I don't use apcupsd but in order to get the machine to respond
> to poweroff, I must append "apm=on" to the kernel params on
> startup. The kernel turns off power management by default even
> though it is compiled in.
He said the machine doesn't shut down, not that it does
I don't use apcupsd but in order to get
the machine to respond to poweroff,
I must append "apm=on" to the kernel
params on startup. The kernel turns
off power management by default even
though it is compiled in.
-=greg
- Original Message -
From: "Dean A. Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
10 matches
Mail list logo