Am Mit, 2002-12-18 um 11.02 schrieb arief_mulya:
> Gary Turner wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
>
> Sorry, not quite clear of your meant here.
Gary wanted to point out that it is seen as "bad behaviour" to delete
the "Someone wrote:" line (attribution-line). If you delete it in your
reply, you make it very h
Dear Gary,
Gary Turner wrote:
Sorry, not quite clear of your meant here.
Given all the dangers alluded to, my curiosity is giving me fits. Just
why do you need/want the 2.5.x kernel? Why not the 2.4 or even the 2.2?
If you said, I missed it (my bad).
Simple, Just for fun. :-)
Ac
arief_mulya wrote:
>
>> Development kernels *do* have bugs which can wipe out all of your data
>> in a second...or trash your BIOS / HD / whatnot all-together. Thats why
>> they are called "unstable". (yes i'm very serious)
>>
>>
>
>Thank you for your kind reminder,
>Today I'm backing up my
Dear all,
Good point IMO.
But be damn sure not to have *anything* important on this PC.
Development kernels *do* have bugs which can wipe out all of your data
in a second...or trash your BIOS / HD / whatnot all-together. Thats why
they are called "unstable". (yes i'm very serious)
Thank yo
Am Mit, 2002-12-18 um 02.57 schrieb arief_mulya:
> Dear,
>
> >>...if you would be ready, you would not ask this question. This is a simple
> >>answer. You would now what to ask, that is a level of trouble resistancy and
> >>problem solving strategies that you should bring with you when you start
>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:57:17AM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> Dear,
> >ACK
> >Don't mess around with experimental stuff (Linux XP?) without knowing
> >what you are doing.
> >
> >To find out what you need for your kernel check its documentation.
> >Its that simple.
>
> Then, When will I know what
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 20:57, arief_mulya wrote:
> Dear,
>
> >>...if you would be ready, you would not ask this question. This is a simple
> >>answer. You would now what to ask, that is a level of trouble resistancy and
> >>problem solving strategies that you should bring with you when you start
>
Dear,
...if you would be ready, you would not ask this question. This is a simple
answer. You would now what to ask, that is a level of trouble resistancy and
problem solving strategies that you should bring with you when you start
playing with experimental (but essential!) software.
ACK
Don't
Am Die, 2002-12-17 um 11.11 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
> #include
> arief_mulya wrote on Tue Dec 17, 2002 um 01:10:41PM:
> > Thank you for kind explanation.
> > Now, suppose me still wants to get into it.
> > What will I need?
> >
> > I learn from previous posts, I'll need newest modutils.
> > Then wh
#include
arief_mulya wrote on Tue Dec 17, 2002 um 01:10:41PM:
> Thank you for kind explanation.
> Now, suppose me still wants to get into it.
> What will I need?
>
> I learn from previous posts, I'll need newest modutils.
> Then what else? I plan to stick on woody for a while, not
...if you wou
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
2.5 is really not for newbies at all. It is the development kernel
(i.e. unfinished, often broken, constantly changing) that will
eventually be released as Linux 2.6. For now, though, you almost
definitely do not want it.
Dear Noah,
Thank you for kind explanation.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:18:34AM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> But can somebody tells a little fairytale about the new 2.5
> kernels? Structures, layouts, newbie-readable-changelog?
2.5 is really not for newbies at all. It is the development kernel
(i.e. unfinished, often broken, constantly chan
Dear all,
Colin Watson wrote:
There've already been several responses to your first post. Please see
the archives if you aren't subscribed.
Oops, sorry.
Didnt' notice that I've unsubscribe.
Reading the archives.. done.
(re)-Subscribing processing.
Subscribing to lkml done.
T
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:31:22AM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> A happy dummy newby here,
There've already been several responses to your first post. Please see
the archives if you aren't subscribed.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:31:22AM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> 6. This newbie gets lots of modules dependency error
There was a post in this list said that modutils (even sid's) wouldn't
work on 2.5.x; you have to recompile it first.
BTW, if module loading was the problem, you can include everyth
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:31:22AM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> Dear All,
Welcome to debian.
> A happy dummy newby here,
>
> 1. This newbie install woody.
Good.
> 2. This newbie download linux-2.5.50.tar.gz
Wow, not too fast. Have you compiled 2.5 series?
Other than geek bragging purpose, why
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:20:37PM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> 2. This newbie download linux-2.5.50.tar.gz
I don't think 'newbie' and '2.5.50' in same sentence is a good idea.
It's still highly experimental and not for general use.
> 4. This newbie get Install succeed but need manual hack
It's a
On 16 Dec 02 09:20:37 GMT, arief_mulya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. This newbie install woody.
> 2. This newbie download linux-2.5.50.tar.gz
Bleeding edge. Warning Will Robinson!
> 3. This newbie untar it and compile it with make-kpkg
> 4. This newbie get Install succeed but need manual hack
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:20:37PM +0700, arief_mulya wrote:
> A happy dummy newby here,
>
> 1. This newbie install woody.
> 2. This newbie download linux-2.5.50.tar.gz
This newbie should use a stable kernel instead. :-)
If you must use development kernels, then you must be prepared to debug
pro
19 matches
Mail list logo
