Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 06:59:14PM -0600, Greg Marks wrote:
>spamd: check: dns_block_rule RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED hit, creating
> /root/.spamassassin/dnsblock_list.dnswl.org (This means DNSBL blocked you due
> to too many queries. Set all affected rules score to 0, or use
> "dns_query_res
Sorry, I meant to ask if the lines should be added to the configuration
file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, not /etc/mail/spamassassin,
which is a directory.
Best regards,
Greg Marks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
David Baron wrote:
> Ever since my 64-bit fresh install adventure, various things simple are not
> working, no idea why.
If you have done a fresh install then you will need to tell us what
you have done. We won't know unless you give details.
> I no longer get logcheck emails, for example.
Say
Bob Proulx wrote:
> How about piping the email through:
>
> | spamassassin -d -t -D 2>&1 | less
>
> That will produce a summary at the bottom with the points from each
> rule that fired. Is that good enough?
Thanks for the suggestion, however there are several problems with this.
Firstly I o
Russell Coker wrote:
> I want to see something like the above with numbers for each test so I can
> easily determine why the total was determined. I know that I can search
> through the SA configuration for each test, but this is time consuming and
> has
> the problem that the SA configuration
Hi,
Camaleón wrote:
I can't see the problem now that you made the change. Is there still
anything wrong with your current setup? :-?
No, it is all fine with the change.
I was going to post this as solved, but thought it might be better to
see what others thought about the change and to make
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:06:08 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On a server that still has lenny, I was getting a message (started on
> 27th June) as follows each day (from /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin
> script:
>
> Jul 2 15:16:26.778 [17797] warn: netset: cannot include 127.0.0.0/8 as
> it has al
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:56:25PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently
> (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example.
>
> Alternatively, where might I lower the points for its internal ruleset?
You can do bo
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:56:25 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Where might I set the cutoff number of points of spamassassin? Currently
> (defaults to) 5 and I get a lot of false alarms at 5.2, for example.
Uusually (it varies depending on you setup) under "/etc/mail/spamassassin/
local.cf"
required_s
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:40:55 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>> Check "/etc/default/spamassassin" file, there is a variable ("CRON=0")
>> that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules auto-updating.
>
> Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that is to specify in the
> same file allow daem
Thank You for Your time and answer, Camaleón:
> Check "/etc/default/spamassassin" file, there is a variable
> ("CRON=0") that you can modify to get a cron job task for SA rules
> auto-updating.
Yes, but does it need running SA as daemon, that is to specify in the
same file allow daemon?
--
To U
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:14:29 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> I wonder if it is possible to auto/manually update spamassassin rules
> without having it running in daemon mode - say, being run by cron only
> update script.
I think SA is ready for that.
Check "/etc/default/spamassassin" file, there is a
On 2010-03-05 03:57, Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using?
fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop
$ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - \
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:34:46 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
>> Mmmm, what MTA/POP3/IMAP design are you using?
>
> fetchmail/postfix/spamassassin/maildrop
>
> $ grep spam /etc/postfix/master.cf
> smtp inet n - n - - \
>smtpd -
On 2010-03-04 08:15, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
Perhaps you need the line:
allow_user_rules 1
in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
Thanks. I'll see how that worked.
No luck.
Added "allow_user_rules 1" to /etc/
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Perhaps you need the line:
>>> allow_user_rules 1
>>> in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
>>
>> Thanks. I'll see how that worked.
>>
>>
> No luck.
>
> Added "allow_user_rules 1" to /etc/spamassassi
On 2010-03-03 01:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
the format:
whitelist_from f...@bar.com
However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. An
On 3.3.2010 17:42, green wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote at 2010-03-03 07:52 -0600:
>> On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should
>>> do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user
>>> whitelist addresses go in ~
Jari Fredriksson wrote at 2010-03-03 07:52 -0600:
> On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should
> > do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user
> > whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the
On 3.3.2010 3:38, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (Up-to-date Sid system.)
>
> SA, which is "attached" to Postfix, isn't doing what I think it should
> do. According to instructions I found on the Intarweb, per-user
> whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with the format:
> whitelist
On 2010-03-02 21:54, green wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
the format:
whitelist_from f...@bar.com
However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any
thoughts?
Perhaps you need the line:
Ron Johnson wrote at 2010-03-02 19:38 -0600:
> per-user whitelist addresses go in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs with
> the format:
> whitelist_from f...@bar.com
> However, whitelisted accounts are still being scored as spam. Any
> thoughts?
Perhaps you need the line:
allow_user_rules 1
in /etc/spa
29.10.2009 4:43, Umarzuki Mochlis kirjoitti:
> I got 2 debian 5 on vmware, both running postfix and dovecot-imap
>
> on server a, i already installed spamassassin and spamc (nothing else
> configured) and add .procmailrc in a user (user1) home directory with
> configuration as below:
>
> ## start
Am 25.12.2008 um 16:07 schrieb Daniel D Jones:
After an apt-get upgrade, Spamassassin failed to configure:
r...@etch:~# dpkg --configure spamassassin
Setting up spamassassin (3.1.7-2etch1) ...
Starting SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: [6777] dbg: logger: adding
facilities: all
[6777] dbg: logg
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:35 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> 1) Have you done a script for update the signatures of spamassassin?
If you're just trying to get the latest score-files for SpamAssassin,
you get those automatically with each new SpamAssassin version from
Debian. You don't need to do anythi
On Mon, 26 May 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> > With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently
> > since the transition of perl 5.1. :-)
>
> Oops... 5.10
>
> Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
> Michelle Konzack
> Systemadministrator
> 24V
Am 2008-05-25 17:42:28, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> With Lenny/Sid you will be killed currently
> since the transition of perl 5.1. :-)
Oops... 5.10
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Lin
Am 2008-05-25 10:55:16, schrieb David Fisher:
> Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to
> start in my lenny amd64 workstation box.
>
> Anyone else with the problem or is it just me?
END OF REPLIED MESSAGE
With Lenny/
On Sun, 25 May 2008, David Fisher wrote:
Following a dist-upgrade this morning the spamd daemon in refusing to
start in my lenny amd64 workstation box.
Anyone else with the problem or is it just me?
I had a very similar problem with my i386 box. Do you have the OpenPGP
plugin installed by any c
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 16:52:17 +0200, Josep M. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have installed spamassassin from www.backports.org and runs well, but
> when I want stop this gives me a message error that perl is not found.
>
> I have all ok in my system, and perl is in the right place, what can I
> do her
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-18 13:04:14 -0700]:
> It can and has in the past. SpamCop's terms of service expressly forbid you
> from reporting mailing list traffic, spam or not.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Klein
Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is th
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 11:59:30 am Klein Moebius wrote:
> If I enable SpamCop reporting in Spamassassin and subsequently
> report a spam message on a mailing list to SpamCop via Spamassasin,
> will the mailing list then get a block from SpamCop?
It can and has in the past. SpamCop's terms of se
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:05:00PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > > I've reconfigured
On Monday 24 September 2007 19:03:47 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > I've reconfigured the file with your recommendations and restarted exim.
> > I'm still not
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:30:21PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 20
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> >
> > > SA should l
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
>
> > SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look
> > for info...
>
> I
On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look
> for info...
I have two spamd entries in mail.info:
Sep 24 14:51:09 etch spamd[10151]: spamd
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Trying to get spamassassin and exim4 playing together. I do not want exim to
> drop email, only to add headers to the message so that the MUA can filter
> messages according to the users preference.
I've recently done this on my
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Now if
> only we could get people to spell, as well.
>
Whut? Spel? Keeboords is hard ennuf!
Ciao,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:09:40AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:50:07 -0800
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:06:05PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > a. Start a new thread not reply to an existing one
> >
> > anot
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:50:07 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:06:05PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > a. Start a new thread not reply to an existing one
>
> another one of those simple things that many people don't seem to get
> right away..
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:06:05PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> a. Start a new thread not reply to an existing one
another one of those simple things that many people don't seem to get
right away... Is it not obvious how to post to the list by mailing to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmm...
A
signa
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:38:07 -0500
"Matthew Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be having trouble getting SpamAssassin running. I have set
> up Etch with PostFix, ProcMail, and SpamAssassin. The PostFix setup
> has been working fine but I wanted to set up SpamAssassin. So I added
> the co
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:11:25PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > I am running SA using SA-Exim at SMTP time. This then rejects the mail
> > before it is accepted, if it doesn't do RFC822 properly.
> >
> > Yeah, I know this is against the RFC, but it has reduced the proces
Greg Folkert wrote:
> I am running SA using SA-Exim at SMTP time. This then rejects the mail
> before it is accepted, if it doesn't do RFC822 properly.
>
> Yeah, I know this is against the RFC, but it has reduced the processing
> on my machine by magnitudes. If they really want to send it to me,
Greg Folkert wrote:
> I am running SA using SA-Exim at SMTP time. This then rejects the mail
> before it is accepted, if it doesn't do RFC822 properly.
>
> Yeah, I know this is against the RFC, but it has reduced the processing
> on my machine by magnitudes. If they really want to send it to me,
fixed top-posting...
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:40:59AM -0800, Brian Hostetler wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:06:18PM -0800, Andrew
> Sackville-West wrote:
> > /var/log/mail.log
> >
> > Jan 29 10:32:36 bigmomma spamd[32442]: spamd: connection from bigmomma
> > [127.0.0.1] at port 4
on, it's a requirement that
user nobody has read and write access or just read?
- Original Message
From: Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:45:52 PM
Subject: Re: spamassassin running as 'nobody'
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:24:09 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:18:17PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:06:18 -0800
> > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > howdy folks.
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > As I understan
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:06:18PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> howdy folks.
>
> I've recently abandoned my increasingly unwieldy bogofilter
> implementation in favor of spamassassin: I'm no longer the only one
> getting mail through this server; and the bogofilter databases were
> gradu
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:31:31PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 17:24 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:18:17PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:06:18 -0800
> > > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 17:24 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:18:17PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:06:18 -0800
> > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > howdy folks.
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > As I understand it, and frmo a litt
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:21:12PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Monday 29 January 2007 17:06, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > As I understand it, and frmo a little google, spamd changes its uid to
> > 'nobody' when it get a message to scan. This causes a problem as it
> > tries to update the AWL a
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:18:17PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:06:18 -0800
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > howdy folks.
> >
>
> >
> > As I understand it, and frmo a little google, spamd changes its
> > uid to 'nobody' when it get a message to scan. Th
On Monday 29 January 2007 17:06, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> As I understand it, and frmo a little google, spamd changes its uid to
> 'nobody' when it get a message to scan. This causes a problem as it
> tries to update the AWL and bayes database files in its $HOME with is
> nonexistent. One rec
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:06:18 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howdy folks.
>
>
> As I understand it, and frmo a little google, spamd changes its
> uid to 'nobody' when it get a message to scan. This causes a
> problem as it tries to update the AWL and bayes database fil
Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
Hi. Where can I find documentations about spamassassin file
configuration priority? I want share DB with bayes records between my
users but if usr have .spamassassin directory and user_pref into it,
those config. are ignored, and system wide file is used. If usr do not
hav
On (14/12/06 11:57), Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am running debian stable and am having problems with spamassassin +
> exim4.
>
> I followed this tutorial to set SA (spamassassin) and exim4 up :
> http://koivi.com/exim4-config/
>
> Mail scanned by exim (using SA) seems to ignore my settings
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 05:45:06PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Hello. I installed sylpheed-claws-spamassassin, and read what I could
> find on it, and on spamassassin, on my computer. Alas, Sylpheed-claws
> is not picking up any of the spam.
>
> I tried starting spamassassin, but get this
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 05:45:06PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> I tried starting spamassassin, but get this message:
>
> debian:/home/mark# /etc/init.d/spamassassin start
> SpamAssassin Mail Filter Daemon: disabled, see /etc/default/spamassassin
> debian:/home/mark# locate /etc/default/spamassas
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:58:21 -0600
Alejandro Bárcena Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Raquel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:31:13 +0800
> > "Gilbert Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Because i saw some message with very high score
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raquel wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:31:13 +0800
> "Gilbert Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Because i saw some message with very high score (>30). It would be
>> nice to stop scanning when the
>> score reach certain level(e.g., 15). But i dunno
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:31:13 +0800
"Gilbert Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thx for your reply.
>
> Removing files from "TRUSTED_RULESETS" in /etc/rulesdujour/config
> > doesn't remove them from /etc/mail/spamassassin. Once you've
> > removed a ruleset from the config file, then manually delet
Thx for your reply.Removing files from "TRUSTED_RULESETS" in /etc/rulesdujour/config
doesn't remove them from /etc/mail/spamassassin. Once you'veremoved a ruleset from the config file, then manually delete it fromthe spamassassin directory.That means, after I remove a rule in TRUSTED_RULESETS, i h
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:47:51 +0800
"Gilbert Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm running Debian Sarge + Spamassassin 3.1.3
>
> Is it possible to
> 1) tell spamassassin to stop scanning after the score has reached
> certain level?
> 2) to make rule files (.cf) being ignored in
> /
Am 2006-05-06 22:45:48, schrieb Martin A. Brooks:
> David Baron wrote:
> >Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the system
> >when a lot of emails are being processed. They are run nice 15. How might
> >I reduce this problem
> Reduce the number of messages that need proce
Am 2006-05-06 22:48:40, schrieb David Baron:
> Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the system
> when
> a lot of emails are being processed. They are run nice 15. How might I reduce
> this problem?
Do you use spamassassin or spamd?
Maybe YOU should use spamd!
Greetin
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Frank Niedermann wrote:
> I've asked for help on the Amavis mailing list [1] and got told that this
> could be Debian specific as SpamAssassin is enabled by default.
Does amavis report that it loaded the spamassassin code in syslog? if it
did report the code was loaded, then
W.D.McKinney wrote:
We use a Barracuda Networks if front of our MTA. Makes the MTA purr.
These are nice boxes that do a perfectly good job. There are other
similar products out there which are perhaps more open source friendly,
though. Ahem.
--
Martin A. Brooks | http://www.antibodym
>-Original Message-
>From: David Baron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2006 10:48 AM
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Spamassassin spamming system?
>
>Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the system when
>a lot of emails are being pro
David Baron wrote:
Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the system when
a lot of emails are being processed. They are run nice 15. How might I reduce
this problem
Reduce the number of messages that need processing, perhaps?
Greylisting springs to mind.
--
Martin A.
On Sat, 06 May 2006 22:48:40 +0300
David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the
> system when a lot of emails are being processed. They are run
> nice 15. How might I reduce this problem?
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Raquel
Adam Hardy wrote:
[snip]
sorry if this is a dumb question, but your email implies spam-assassin
does DNS look-ups to filter out spam - which is not what I thought
after giving spam assassin the once-over check-out. Is it so? What
level of effectiveness does it have?
And can it actually fi
"Robert S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Don't know if this is of any help, but a lot of DNS tests seem to timeout:
>
Think I've got it fixed. Changed settings in /etc/resolv.conf. Might give
djbdns a go sometime. I think our broadband router is doing funny thi
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 07:58:07PM +, Adam Hardy wrote:
> sorry if this is a dumb question, but your email implies spam-assassin
> does DNS look-ups to filter out spam - which is not what I thought
> after giving spam assassin the once-over check-out. Is it so? What
> level of effectiveness doe
Robert S on 15/11/05 20:49, wrote:
Don't know if this is of any help, but a lot of DNS tests seem to timeout:
debug: RBL: success for 9 of 17 queries
debug: DNS: timeout for NO_DNS_FOR_FROM after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-untrusted after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-firstt
Don't know if this is of any help, but a lot of DNS tests seem to timeout:
debug: RBL: success for 9 of 17 queries
debug: DNS: timeout for NO_DNS_FOR_FROM after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-untrusted after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-firsttrusted after 14 seconds
debug: DNS:
Don't know if this is of any help, but a lot of DNS tests seem to timeout:
debug: RBL: success for 9 of 17 queries
debug: DNS: timeout for NO_DNS_FOR_FROM after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-untrusted after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: timeout for bsp-firsttrusted after 14 seconds
debug: DNS: t
> Is this package installed?
>
> libnet-dns-perl
>
Yes - it is installed:
# apt-get install libnet-dns-perl -s
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libnet-dns-perl is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Any other ide
How do I get my Sarge box to do these DNS lookups? Have I not
installed something?
Is this package installed?
libnet-dns-perl
Regards
Mathias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Saturday 20 August 2005 08:19, Wayne Sitton(Wayne Sitton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) disait:
Hello,
> Lint output: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
> pyzor_add_header 1
> warning: description for RCVD_BOUNCED_FORGED is over 50 chars
> warning: rule 'RCVD_CHALLENGE_RESPONSE' is ov
On Monday 13 June 2005 21:21, Chris Searle wrote:
> Old woody system - the bayes files for spamassassin give the
> following:
>
> $ file *
> bayes_seen: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
> bayes_toks: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
>
> New sarge system - per
On 2005-06-13 15:21:55 +0200, Chris Searle wrote:
> Now - that's a lot of learning that's been going thru - is there an
> easy way to convert from version 5 to version 8 ?
Perhaps with db4.2_upgrade from the db4.2-util package?
(Not tested -- use it at your own risk.)
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL
Chris Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Old woody system - the bayes files for spamassassin give the
> following:
>
> $ file *
> bayes_seen: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
> bayes_toks: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order)
>
> New sarge system - perl's T
On Sunday 09 January 2005 10:18 am, Glyn Tebbutt wrote:
> I recently this weekend setup my server as an imap server to store and
> sort my mail so i can read my mail from everywhere, anyway i've set it
> up with isp pop > fetchmail > exim4 > spamassassin > courier
> anyway i wondered, as i've sear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Glyn,
| anyway i wondered, as i've search google, does anyone know of website
| that will send spam to you to test your filters ?
I think that most distributions of SpamAssassin contain some test
messages - the easiest way to test SpamAssassin with t
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Travis Crump ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041207 21:30]:
>> MrVanes wrote:
>> >I've been watching the spamassassin package page
>
> The current concerns are that the maintainer wrote in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/11/msg00403.html that he
> doesn't consider the cu
* Travis Crump ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041207 21:30]:
> MrVanes wrote:
> >I've been watching the spamassassin package page
> >(http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/spamassassin.html) for a while now, hoping
> >for spamassassin 3.0 to enter testing but it's being held (for 23 days) by
> >some 'aba'.
> [...
MrVanes wrote:
Hi,
I've been watching the spamassassin package page
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/spamassassin.html) for a while now, hoping
for spamassassin 3.0 to enter testing but it's being held (for 23 days) by
some 'aba'.
SA has no dependancies (as far as I can see) that need to be fulfill
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:20:05 +0200, Vadik wrote:
> I run my web and email server on machine with 32 Mb RAM. It works fine,
> but spamassassin really takes a lot of memory. And to make things
> worse, it often runs 10 and more sessions. is the a way I can configure
> spamassassin to run no mor
* Vadik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I run my web and email server on machine with 32 Mb RAM. It works fine,
> but spamassassin really takes a lot of memory. And to make things
> worse, it often runs 10 and more sessions. is the a way I can configure
> spamassassin to run no more than 1 sessi
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:10:31PM -0700, Vadik wrote:
> I run my web and email server on machine with 32 Mb RAM. It works fine,
> but spamassassin really takes a lot of memory. And to make things
> worse, it often runs 10 and more sessions. is the a way I can configure
> spamassassin to run
"Jacob Vallandingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to run spamassassin on an internal linux box with sendmail. It
> is runing but the e-mails I send for tests don't get the *SPAM*
> message in the header. I know the content of the e-mails should be
> classified as spam and I'
On Thursday 27 May 2004 20:03, Jacob Vallandingham hurled the following on the
wire:
> I am trying to run spamassassin on an internal linux box with sendmail. It
> is runing but the e-mails I send for tests don't get the *SPAM*
> message in the header. I know the content of the e-mails sh
I am assuming you are processing spamassassin before you tell sendmail to
deliver. I use qmail so I can't really tell you how to make sure.
At any rate:
Otherwise go to /etc/spamassassin and edit the local.cf file and change the
subject tag to what you want. If you change the required hits in
> I too like SpamProbe but that word file can get big. 278MB on my
> primary platform.
OK. Sure, pairs of words will give you better precision, and square the
size of your database.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:35:01PM -0600 or thereabouts, John Hasler wrote:
> S.D.A. wrote:
> > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that
> > reads the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be
> > running 'sa-learn' as mail user?
>
> Yes. Note that yo
S.D.A. wrote:
> Now, when I'm training SA, I've been using 'sa-learn' as the user that
> reads the mail. However since Exim is run as mail user, should I be
> running 'sa-learn' as mail user?
Yes. Note that you will have to make sure that "mail-user" has permission
to read the mail.
--
John Hasl
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:36AM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:19:11PM -0500, S.D.A. wrote:
> > > I have Exim running, with spamc activated via Exim (not procmail).
> > >
> > > Now, when I'm training SA, I've been us
1 - 100 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
