On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 11:04:18 +, Brian wrote:
> If non-free firmware is provided during the course of using the installer
> the "official" sources.list includes non-free.
A misleading statement. The non-free archive is marked for inclusion but
the user must choose to have it written to sour
On Thu 21 Jan 2016 at 23:10:51 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:1
On Wed 20 Jan 2016 at 17:56:53 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > > Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > > >
> > > > is e
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:57:52PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > > Amr Saber wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > While I w
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:34:31 + Brian wrote:
> On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > http.debian.net/debian/
> > >
> > > is exactly the same as
> > >
> > > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> > >
> > > The
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:17:42 +1300 Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't ge
On Fri 15 Jan 2016 at 09:54:30 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > http.debian.net/debian/
> >
> > is exactly the same as
> >
> > httpredir.debian.org/debian/
> >
> > The .org indicates it is an official, supported mirror but it makes no
> > dif
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:18:09PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:08:53 +
Brian wrote:
> On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> > Amr Saber wrote:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as
> > > apt-get couldn't get any pac
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:36:33PM -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-f
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 18:18:09 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
> Amr Saber wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for ea
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
> Hi there,
> While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
> any way, The proble
On Thu 14 Jan 2016 at 09:39:26 +0530, Udyant Wig wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> >>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
On 01/14/2016 02:08 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
>
>> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
>>> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
>>> and I can't find any version of it online
>>
>> deb http://ftp.
On 01/13/2016 06:10 PM, Jochen Spieker wrote:
Jose Martinez:
Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
Hmmm...What a novel idea!!
--
Qu
On Thursday 14 January 2016 00:10:17 Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Jose Martinez:
> > Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> > mozilla.debian.net repository??
>
> I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
> http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
You beat me to it,
Jose Martinez:
>
> Lisi, where can you get the authentication signature for the the
> mozilla.debian.net repository??
I am not Lisi, but have you considered just going straight to
http://mozilla.debian.net/? :)
J.
--
When you put a gun to my head you aren't fooling anyone.
[Agree] [Disagree]
On 01/13/2016 05:38 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked t
I really cant thank you all enough :)
On 14 Jan 2016 01:39, "Lisi Reisz" wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> > On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > > couldn't
On Wednesday 13 January 2016 23:22:30 David Christensen wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
> > couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
> > spelling for each package)
On 01/13/2016 10:31 AM, Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
You can search for packages here:
On 01/13/2016 02:38 PM, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
Hi there,
While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
spelling for each package) and it just said
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0200
Amr Saber wrote:
>Hi there,
>While I was configuring some thing in the sources.list file as apt-get
>couldn't get any package I wanted or asked for (I double checked the
>spelling for each package) and it just said package not found ...
>any way, The problem is
On Wed 13 Jan 2016 at 12:36:33 -0600, rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> > The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> > and I can't find any version of it online
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free
On Wed, January 13, 2016 12:31 pm, Amr Saber wrote:
> The problem is that the sources.list file was accidentally deleted
> and I can't find any version of it online
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main non-free contr
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:52:48 +
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> > Hi
> > All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
> >
> > Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> > insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> > ove
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:40:10PM +, Richard wrote:
> Hi
> All downloads , but I'm getting this:-
>
> Setting up initscripts (2.88dsf-22) ...
> insserv: warning: script 'K50vmware-USBArbitrator' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'K01vmware' missing LSB tags and over
On Friday 15 April 2011 23:49:24 Christian Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone change status of this post to SOLVED ?!
You can - just add SOLVED to the subject line!! It is usually put at the
beginning.
I have done it for you. It is no more complicated than it is to start the
thread in the first place,
>>There is only one question left:
>>Why did this happen? What could I have done, that these values changed to
>>-1?
>
>I don't know any tool that edits that file. I always edit it with (sudo -e
>/etc/apt/preferences). So, my assumption is that you made the change
>yourself, perhaps without knowing
In <1393449085.44289.1302886728608.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb037>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none
>>of your packages have installation candidates.
>>
>>Check /
>You've pinned all your available repositories to a negative value. APT
>refuses to install any package with a negative priority, which is why none of
>your packages have installation candidates.
>
>Check /etc/apt/preferences and /etc/apt/preferences.d/*; you've got at least
>on stanza wrong in
In <406058322.9701.1302882000282.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034>, Christian Jakob
wrote:
>root@debian # apt-cache policy
>Package files:
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> release a=now
> -1 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/contrib Packages
> release v=5.0,o=Debian,a=oldstable,l=Debian-Security,c=c
TO: scot..
>Um, fsck did what?
First there came a WARNING: sd2 is mounted ... blabla
Then something like this:
/dev/sda2: recovering journal
/dev/sda2: clean, ... files, ... blocks
For me this looked like fsck didn't do anything...
But, I think there is no hardwa
On 15/04/11 01:07, Christian Jakob wrote:
> fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
Um, fsck did what?
Did it simply optimise directories - or did the file system need repairing?
Did it test the ability of the drive to retain data - find some sections
where failing and add them to t
On 14/04/11 15:46, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>> scons and posting the output?
>
> root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Selecting previously deselected package scons.
(Reading database ... 175 901 files and directories cur
(TOFU corrected. In general, this list prefers well-trimmed posts with
replies interleaved or underneath the quoted context. Some prefer top-
posting, but I think everyone with an opinion desires posts to be well-
trimmed.)
In <998647986.2435386.1302844626401.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb033>, Christia
root@debian # apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release.gpg
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release.gpg
Hit http://security.debian.org lenny/updates Release
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny Release
Ign http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages/DiffIndex
I
In <1038309152.3627061.1302793651098.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb038>, Christian
Jakob wrote:
>fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
>
>root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
>root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
>Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
>Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
>L
fsck did something, but it doesn't fix the problem ...
root@debian # dpkg -l | grep aptitude
root@debian # apt-get install aptitude
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Lese Status-Informationen ein... Fertig
Paket aptitude ist nicht verfügbar, wird aber von einem
>Before trying to replace apt... how about trying a manual install of
>scons and posting the output?
root@debian # dpkg -i scons_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Wähle vormals abgewähltes Paket scons.
(Lese Datenbank ... 175901 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Entpacke scons (aus scons_1.0.0-1_
On 14/04/11 02:59, Christian Jakob wrote:
>> scott@work:~$ python -V
>> Python 2.5.2
>
> this is the same as mine...
>
> root@debian # python -V
> Python 2.5.2
You appear to have all the listed dependancies
>
>> Have you manually installed scons?
>> Did it throw up any errors?
>
> No I d
>Had you temporarily used other repositories around that time?
No, /etc/apt/sources.list~ is empty.
>The dependencies for scons are python... could it be that you have some
>non-standard python on your system??
>Occasionally I've had install problems because I'd forgotten that I'd
>temporarily ma
On 13/04/11 02:26, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>
>> There's the clue.
>> If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>> install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>> about
>
> Yes, I can not remembe
Ok, first of all: Thank you for helping me!
>There's the clue.
>If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
>install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something you don't know
>about
Yes, I can not remember what I did wrong last time I used Debian.
Maybe it is im
On 12/04/11 15:38, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Good morning,
>
>
> No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/months and not only with this
> package...
There's the clue.
If you can't remember what happened then (mixed repositories, aborted
install, bodgied compile etc) then maybe it's something y
Good morning,
>The only things I can think of are:-
>;temporary problem with the repository (it certainly works at the time
>of writing this)
>;your apt database is corrupted
>;weird dependency problem/conflicts
>
>Any non-Lenny perl on your system?
No, the problem occurs since a few weeks/month
On 12/04/11 04:48, Christian Jakob wrote:
> Hi @all,
>
>
> Normally I can handle debian problems by my own, but this time I have a
> really unusual problem with apt-get.
> I use german version of lenny on a 32 bit i386 architecture.
> Internet connection works fine and public keys are up-to-date
Op 13-07-10 19:12, PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41 +0200
> From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
>
> PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>&g
From: prakhar_aaid...@hotmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:21 +0530
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:38:41
+0200
From: sjo...@lorentz.leidenuniv.nl
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problem with apt-get --
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
>>>You might also add:
>>>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
>>
>>
PRAKHAR gaur schreef:
You might also add:
export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight problem, when ever I use "sudo apt-get update",
it does not work. but if I become root first, using "su", and then so the same
thing, it works.
I tried closing all the terminals and opening
Dear Liam,
>Probably one of your configuration files was replaced during the upgrade. The
>original will have been preserved with the extension
>.dpkg-old.
I installed the OS again, did not upgrade it.
>You might also add:
>export ftp_proxy=$http_proxy
Ok.
But now there is a slight proble
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_7a55ae90-0232-4da2-b05b-00081b0cad13_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Dear Liam=2C=20
>
> apt-get used to work before so I was not able to figure out there might be =
> a problem with the p
On 2010-07-13, PRAKHAR gaur wrote:
> --_5b50f58c-d645-427a-a81a-d158616ad201_
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear All=2C
>
> I am using Debian 5.0.5=2C on a x86 machine. The Network is through a DHCP =
> server. For co
The computer has connected to the router but it has a
static IP address. The apt-get command has worked
fine before.
When I run 'apt-get update', it doesn't complain about
sources.list format problem.
--- "Mumia W.."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your sources.list, as posted, isn't formatted
On 09/25/2007 12:49 PM, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all. I've tried apt
I've replace 'sarge' with 'oldstable' once. Now I try
again and apt-get update gives the same result: Failed
to fetch packages 404 not found. Here is the output
from apt-get update:
Err http://debian.yorku.ca oldstable/main Packages 404
Not Found
Err http://security.debian.org oldstable/updates/ma
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Steve Lam wrote:
I have a problem with 'apt-get update' command and it
bugs me for weeks. I've tried to update Debian with
the command 'apt-get update' and it failed to fetch
packages. I've fixed the etc/apt/sources.list file but
It doesn't help me at all. I've tried apt-s
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Liam and Ismael,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
>
>http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
>
> about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
> according to this -- great.
>
> Also, I used apt-show-versions to f
Liam and Ismael,
Thanks a lot for your answers; I read the article
http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
about apt pinning and set up my /etc/apt/preferences
according to this -- great.
Also, I used apt-show-versions to find the packages from
unstable:
backup:/mnt# apt-get remove gc
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:09:05 +0200
Kaspar Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a very basic problem and would be glad to be pointed into
> the right direction: Some time ago, I installed debian-sarge and
> was forced to install a version of samba that was only available
>
Kaspar Fischer escribe:
> How can I do this, i.e., tell apt-get to uninstall everything
> from unstable and install "the same" packages from the stable
> tree? I currently end up having tons of dependency/etc. problems.
Google for apt pinning. In an ideal world, you can roll back your
system to st
Am 2006-03-15 13:23:07, schrieb Michael Ott:
> Hello!
>
> I want to install java on my Sarge.
>
> I put the line finding in the Debian Java FAQ and start
> apt-get update.
>
> And i got this error message:
> Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org stable/main Release
> Err ftp://ftp.tux.org stable/non-free
"Michael Ott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ftp://ftp.tux.org stable/non-free Packages
> Protocol corruption
I'm pretty sure you've got the ftp URL wrong.
Can you go back to the source of the info and check the URL?
Nic Ferrier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:
hi all,
i cannot apt-get update, upgrade or apt-cache search.
get errors below :
debian:~# apt-cache search
E: Couldn't make mmap of 134217728 bytes - mmap (12 Cannot allocate
memory)
W: Unable to munmap
debian:~# apt-get update
.
.
Reading package lists... Err
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:17:09PM +0800, Chong Zan Kai wrote:
>And some more, my base-config i missing again...
>
>The output:
>debian:/# su
>debian:/# base-config
>bash: base-config: command not found
My base-config was removed due to dependencies/conflicts when updating
to Sid. Just try install
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:00:28PM +0800, Chong Zan Kai wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Recently I have upgraded my Debian from sarge to Sid. However, i found that
>apt-get does not work anymore. Any one can tell me what to do?
Does your network work at all?
/M
--
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0x
And some more, my base-config i missing again...The output:debian:/# sudebian:/# base-configbash: base-config: command not foundOn 1/28/06,
Chong Zan Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Recently I have upgraded my Debian from sarge to Sid. However, i found that apt-get does not work anymore. Any one
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 09:57:54AM -0600, Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I make an apt-get update I get an error concerning a gpg key:
>
>
> W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
> signatures were invalid: BADSIG F1D53D8C4F368D5D Debian Archive
> Aut
Sergio Cuéllar Valdés wrote:
>Yesterday I didnt have this problem.
>
>
Ask google,.. view the archieve.
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Renz wrote:
> apt-get wants to install libc6_2.3.2.ds1-18_sparc.deb (to replace
> libc6-2.3.2-7). However, the installation aborts telling me that "You
> have a cpu which requires kernel 2.4.21 or greater in order to
> install this version of glibc." I tried to fix it by installing
> ker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 05 September 2004 07:15, Paul E Condon wrote:
> When attempting to run apt-get update, I get the following error
>
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occured while processing python-vtk (NewVersion1
On Thursday 02 September 2004 09:39, Matthew Singerman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was attempting to install KDE yesterday, but it died halfway through. I
> am now running into very silly problems. When I try it again, I get the
> following:
>
> # apt-get install kde
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Bu
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:10:19 -0600
Brad Camroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Reading Package Lists... 1%
> Reading Package Lists... 16%
> Reading Package Lists... 32%
> Reading Package Lists... 49%
> Reading Package Lists... 62%
> Reading Package Lists... Error!
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Nelson E. Castillo wrote:
I Think you don't use the kernel-patch package
unless you compile a Kernel yourself. The 2.4.18
version doesn't say much, since they append a
trailing number to the package with each update. I
think it's ok if you use the last binary (precom
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:08:33AM -0800, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
> > vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
> > Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
I gave you the wrong advice.
I Think you don't use the kernel-patch package unless you
compile a Kernel yourself. The 2.4.18 version doesn't say
much, s
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:24:18PM -0800, Billy
Pilgrim wrote:
...
> vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
...
> Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
As you can see, the packages names differ. Maybe you
don't
have a default kernel installed but one you (or
someone
else) compiled. That's what
Hi.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:24:18PM -0800, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
...
> vmlinux-2.4.18-newpmac
...
> Package: kernel-patch-2.4.18-powerpc
As you can see, the packages names differ. Maybe you don't
have a default kernel installed but one you (or someone
else) compiled. That's w
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:53, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:48:00 +1100, Brian Poole wrote:
>
> > I created sources.list manually.
>
> .. as is obvious once I look at it closely. Is that mixture of stable,
> testing and unstable with good intentions and I assume you know what you
> ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 02:09:50PM +1100, Brian Poole wrote:
> Hi I am getting the following problem when doing an apt-get upgrade:
>
> I get many messages like:
>
> Get:58 ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable/main grep 2.5.1.ds1-2 [161kB]
> Err ftp:/
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:48:00 +1100, Brian Poole wrote:
> I created sources.list manually.
.. as is obvious once I look at it closely. Is that mixture of stable,
testing and unstable with good intentions and I assume you know what you
are doing ? Which version do you actually run ? What does
cat
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 16:37, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Have you tried to create a source.list automatically (netselect-apt) or
> manually changing the mirror ?
I created sources.list manually.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Brian Poole wrote:
You always start with
apt-get update, don't you ?
yes
Goodie.
If it prevails, wait. Patience. It needs some time for those files to
propagate to the mirror.
ok I'll wait longer but I have been waiting for over 1 week.
Sounds much too long.
From here I have no access to you
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 15:28, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> You always start with
> apt-get update, don't you ?
yes
> If it prevails, wait. Patience. It needs some time for those files to
> propagate to the mirror.
ok I'll wait longer but I have been waiting for over 1 week.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:09:50 +1100, Brian Poole wrote:
> I get many messages like:
>
> Get:58 ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable/main grep 2.5.1.ds1-2 [161kB]
> Err ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au unstable/main grep 2.5.1.ds1-2
> Unable to fetch file, server said
> '/debian/pool/main/g/grep/grep_2.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:59:20PM +0100, Joseph Jones wrote:
> Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 at 14:51 GMT, Joseph Jones penned:
> >
> >
> >>I installed some unstable packages, and I'd like to know whether
> >>there's a way of having dselect or whatever un-install all the
> >>
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 at 14:51 GMT, Joseph Jones penned:
I installed some unstable packages, and I'd like to know whether
there's a way of having dselect or whatever un-install all the
unstable packages without having to mess around fixing dependancies.
As in, I don't wan
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 at 14:51 GMT, Joseph Jones penned:
> I installed some unstable packages, and I'd like to know whether
> there's a way of having dselect or whatever un-install all the
> unstable packages without having to mess around fixing dependancies.
> As in, I don't want it to do anything b
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:07:29PM +, Adam Robson wrote:
> While trying to run apt-get update or dselect I get the error
>
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
>
> I've created the file /etc/apt/apt.conf with contents APT::Cache-Limit
> 25165824, and I've reduced my sources.list to only one ent
Quoting Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:26:29PM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > It is almost certainly trying to upgrade dpkg on top of itself while
> > running.
>
> That's supported and quite OK.
>
> > The instructions at
> >
> > http://qref.sourceforge.net/De
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:26:29PM -0600, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> It is almost certainly trying to upgrade dpkg on top of itself while
> running.
That's supported and quite OK.
> The instructions at
>
> http://qref.sourceforge.net/Debian/reference/ch-package.en.html#s6.2.9
>
> helped me.
Th
It is almost certainly trying to upgrade dpkg on top of itself while
running. The instructions at
http://qref.sourceforge.net/Debian/reference/ch-package.en.html#s6.2.9
helped me.
HTH,
Jeffrey
Quoting Margaret Toews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Last week I did an apt-get upgrade on my 2.2.17 OS re
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:02:42PM -0600, Margaret Toews wrote:
> Last week I did an apt-get upgrade on my 2.2.17 OS release which
> error-ed out with "E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited unexpectedly".
That's essentially a summary which means "An error has occurred. See
above for the details".
>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:26:55AM +0100, Pierre Burri wrote:
> Hi
> after installing a minimal potato system , I wanted to make an update with
> "apt-get update" and got the following error (this output is after a secopnd
> try):
>
,,,.
> Reading Package Lists...
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out o
Hi,
There are two problems behind this. First, dist-upgrade do not seem to
make the good choice about which package to remove (I think this comes
from the fact that 'tar' creates the problem, but 'tar' is essential).
However it would make more sense to keep back tar than to remove the
kernel!
The
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 04:32:47PM +0100, Richard Gaywood wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:42:56AM -0400, Andrew Dixon wrote:
> > I'd also recommend getting rid of Ximain and installing Gnome from
> > the Debian .debs. It really does eliminate a lot of headaches.
>
> Know of any rough instru
Thank you!
This worked perfectly. I'm now back to a clean installation of CUPS.
Regards,
Randy
On 23 Jul 2001 10:42:56 -0400, Andrew Dixon wrote:
> "Randolph S. Kahle" wrote:
> >
> > I may have messed up my package database...
>
> ximian may have messed it up too. I find that it's a good ide
"Randolph S. Kahle" wrote:
>
> I may have messed up my package database...
ximian may have messed it up too. I find that it's a good idea to stay
away from ximian and use the gnome stuff from the Debian archives.
Ximian writes great stuff but they don't do a very good job packaging it
so it cre
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:42:56AM -0400, Andrew Dixon wrote:
> I'd also recommend getting rid of Ximain and installing Gnome from
> the Debian .debs. It really does eliminate a lot of headaches.
Know of any rough instructions on how to do this? Is it just a matter of
taking Ximian out of sourc
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how I can get apt-get to go through a proxy.
man apt.conf
export http_proxy="http://fooo:1243/";
apt-get update
Jason
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
