On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash"
> to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as
> recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.service"
> completes in two seconds!
A simila
On 21/01/2023 01:55, Charles Curley wrote:
root@white:~# ps aux | grep -i openssl
root 4586 5.8 0.9 8256 2064 pts/3S+ 11:48 0:00 grep
--colour=auto -i openssl
root 4587 150 2.1 4720 ?R11:48 0:00
/usr/bin/openssl x509 -subject_hash_old -fingerprint
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash"
> to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as
> recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.service"
> completes in two seconds!
>
> Will
On 2023-01-20 21:11 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-01-20 20:45 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> My hunch is that postfix recomputes all the hashes in
>> /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs, rather than copying the files from the
>> host system into the chroot which would be a lot faster.
>
> For
Am Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:28:10PM +0100 schrieb Sven Joachim:
> On 2023-01-20 13:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Hello Community,
> >> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop
> >> there are very
On 2023-01-20 20:45 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-01-20 11:55 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100
>> Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>>> Clearly something fishy is going on here.
>>
>> I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's
>> a sample of
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:37 AM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now
> refuses to run.
>
> root@white:/var/spool# systemctl start postfix@-.service
> Job for postfix@-.service failed because a timeout was exceeded.
> See "systemctl status pos
On 2023-01-20 11:55 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> Clearly something fishy is going on here.
>
> I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's
> a sample of what it was doing. It is a processor hog.
>
> root@white:~
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:28:22 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue".
In this case, laziness. The default timeout is 60 seconds. I added 30
to that. Then doubled it. Etc. That doesn't mean you are wrong. I'd
like to know what that ssl command is
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:55:35AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> My previous timeout vale was 180 seconds, which wasn't enough. So my
> ancient anemic box needed between 180 and 360 seconds to start postfix.
> (But see below.)
More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue".
On 2023-01-20 13:39 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop
>> there are very long delays both at boot:
>>
>> ,
>> | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1
>> | 33.340s p
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 19:17:37 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Clearly something fishy is going on here.
I concur. What I saw with htop was a slew of calls to SSL. Here's
a sample of what it was doing. It is a processor hog.
root@white:~# ps aux | grep -i openssl
root 4586 5.8 0.9 8256 2064
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop
> there are very long delays both at boot:
>
> ,
> | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1
> | 33.340s postfix@-.service
> `
A delay that's a multiple of 3
On 2023-01-20 09:34 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
>> That suggests there's something wrong with
>> the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later
>> today.
>
> Not quite "later today", but:
>
> A bit of thinking about
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> That suggests there's something wrong with
> the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later
> today.
Not quite "later today", but:
A bit of thinking about it, and I realized that the computer in
question is an ancient
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:00:31 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Run the postfix executable by hand as root, and look for error
> messages and log entries in /var/log/mail.log among other locations.
Well, that was interesting. Thanks.
In mail.log I found the following from an earlier run:
2023-01-13T06
Charles Curley wrote:
> I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now
> refuses to run.
Run the postfix executable by hand as root, and look for error messages
and log entries in /var/log/mail.log among other locations.
-dsr-
And, of course, half an hour after giving up and asking for help, I discovered
what I needed to change.
I did a "journalctl | grep smtp" and noticed that, when my machine was
connecting to gmail, it seemed to be doing so on port 25. Aha!
So I changed my transport file explicitly to use port 5
Hello.
Do you have "relayhost" set to gmail SMTP server?
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relayhost
Did you call postmap(1) to build password file?
http://www.postfix.org/postmap.1.html
Here are a couple of tutorials:
http://postfix.cs.utah.edu/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
https://
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:51:29 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On the upside, though, this is an allowlist of domains postfix will
> accept mail for. If there are duplicates, it shouldn't REALLY make
> much difference.
Thanks for the analysis.
I don't mind the duplicates, and the spurious comma is pr
On 20/04/2021 00:08, Charles Curley wrote:
> On installing on Bullseye, I usually install postfix, then configure it
> with "dpkg-reconfigure postfix".
>
> I use postfix here only for logwatch and other system emails, so the
> setup isn't concerned with the Internet at large.
>
> The default list
myhostname = myhost.local
really?
I changed the name of mail server :)
1) uid of postfix user
id postfix
119
Are there any issues in the log?
journalctl _UID=
output of journalctl _UID=199 it's normal
thanks
--
Pol
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 09:12:28PM +0200, Pòl Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks :-)
> suddenly postfix is dead. Sometime after 1/2mins goes down... sometime
> doesn't start...
>
> I already tried to reinstall with purge, delete config files, etc. but same
> problem...
>
> help me please :)
We are here to
Dan Ritter writes:
[...]
> but I think you want in-message headers. So you need a filter
> that can insert one cleanly.
My conclusions are the same (and another solution: lmtp, because it
would be put into dovecot accessed mailboxes)
> I'm not sure why you want to do all this, though, becaus
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>
> Exim has a nice feature: it puts "Delivery-date" header when terminates
> delivery to pipe/mailbox.
>
> Is it posible with postfix?
It is possible, not necessarily convenient.
Here's how Postfix delivers mail:
http://www.postfix.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:51:10 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 31/08/16 13:33, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
> > wrote:
> >> So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
> >> initially, then perhaps for others). My extensi
On 31/08/16 15:02, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as th
On 31/08/16 13:33, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
> out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
>
> I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as this one. I currently use
> Th
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
> So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
> initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
> that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's not
> really my problem.
What you're
On 05/02/16 13:58, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:28:54PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi,
Running Postfix under Jessie. At some time in the past I managed to
increase the logging verbosity to track down a problem, which I've
solved.
I now have a vast amount of data in mail.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:28:54PM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi,
Running Postfix under Jessie. At some time in the past I managed to
increase the logging verbosity to track down a problem, which I've
solved.
I now have a vast amount of data in mail.log, which is obscuring
useful messa
with the following commands , I solve my problem.
mv /var/lib/dpkg/postfix.* /tmp/
dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq postfix
The commands can help users to manually remove a broken package.
Then I can install postfix again succesfully.
- mudongliang
From: mudonglianga...@hotmail.com
To:
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
peter green wrote:
While attempting to look into a mail issue on one of my machines I
noticed that /var/log/mail/mail.log did not appear to have been
updated since december.
I belive that this may have been triggered by an upgrade from squeeze
to wheezy but I don't remember exactly when I upg
On Lu, 10 feb 14, 16:42:38, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> Why not use procmail over maildrop? Have a global procmailrc and then
> you can run custom user filters later too. With procmail maildir
> delivery it's easy to run IMAP/pop servers like dovecot which does a
> good job to pickup procmailrc as wel
Why not use procmail over maildrop? Have a global procmailrc and then you can
run custom user filters later too. With procmail maildir delivery it's easy to
run IMAP/pop servers like dovecot which does a good job to pickup procmailrc as
well and sort folders.
I had initially thought to add Cyr
On Sb, 08 feb 14, 23:50:06, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>
> No other suggestions but one I already made: check maildrop's
> documentation. That will hopefully help you to find out why maildrop
> fails to connect to (courier's?) authdaemon. WAG: permissions of the the
> corresponding socket are wrong.
07.02.2014 20:05, Andrei POPESCU:
> I tried using pipe(8), by reusing the already existing definition in
> master.cf
>
> maildrop unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/maildrop -d ${recipient}
>
>
> and setting
>
> mailbox_transport =
On Mi, 05 feb 14, 13:29:08, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>
> What is a "notmuch"?
apt-cache show notmuch ;)
> Anyway: How does maildrop get mail from postfix - via pipe? If so,
> remove the F from the flags to the pipe call in master.cf
I'm was using the simplest method, which is via mailbox_comman
05.02.2014 12:16, Andrei POPESCU:
> The setup
> -
> I am running postfix on my laptop mostly for sending, but also local
> mail (cron, r2e, etc.), maildrop for sorting/filtering to Maildirs and
> notmuch for indexing (via a cron job).
>
> The problem
> ---
> Since version 2.7.1-
On 07/12/13 22:36, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:22:09AM -0800, David Guntner wrote:
>> Look into Procmail, which might already be installed as the LDA for Postfix.
>
> Maildrop should also work fine here if you prefer that. If your script
> runs as a specific user, and that sp
On 07/12/13 15:22, David Guntner wrote:
> Tony van der Hoff grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>> Hi, list,
>>
>> I have a squeezy VPS, running Postfix to handle all my mail, plus
>> several virtual users, with which I'm entirely satisfied.
>>
>> I also have a number of remote, normally unattended, loca
Kumar Appaiah:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:17:33PM +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> Tony van der Hoff:
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how to attach some sort of filter/trigger to postfix to
>>> cause a script to be run on incoming mail with particular conditions,
>>> or would anyone like to suggest a be
On 12/7/2013 6:58 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> I also have a number of remote, normally unattended, locations, with
> dynamic IPs, containing IP cameras to keep an eye on things. I'm not
> able to access/change the camera firmware. These cameras send me an
> email if their IP changes, containing
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:22:09AM -0800, David Guntner wrote:
> Look into Procmail, which might already be installed as the LDA for Postfix.
Maildrop should also work fine here if you prefer that. If your script
runs as a specific user, and that specific user doesn't get any other
mail, then a .f
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> I have a squeezy VPS, running Postfix to handle all my mail, plus
> several virtual users, with which I'm entirely satisfied.
Please consider upgrading from oldstable Squeeze 6 to the current
stable Wheezy 7.
> So far, so good, but what I'd really like to do is intercep
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:17:33PM +0100, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Tony van der Hoff:
> >
> > Does anyone know how to attach some sort of filter/trigger to postfix to
> > cause a script to be run on incoming mail with particular conditions,
> > or would anyone like to suggest a better solution?
>
Tony van der Hoff grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Hi, list,
>
> I have a squeezy VPS, running Postfix to handle all my mail, plus
> several virtual users, with which I'm entirely satisfied.
>
> I also have a number of remote, normally unattended, locations, with
> dynamic IPs, containing IP camer
Tony van der Hoff:
>
> Does anyone know how to attach some sort of filter/trigger to postfix to
> cause a script to be run on incoming mail with particular conditions,
> or would anyone like to suggest a better solution?
I would do that during delivery of the e-mails, probably using Postfix.
J.
I wrote the perl script again. The new script contains my own ip address
range check. if the IP of the domain is in my IP range it prints "200
dovecot:" message.
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# author: Hari Hendaryanto
#use strict;
use warnings;
use Sys::Syslog qw(:DEFAULT setlogsock);
use Net::DNS;
use
On 29-11-2013 01:30, Gregory Nowak wrote:
The main.cf portion you posted didn't have a
mydestination =
line. If it in fact doesn't, then you probably want to add one as in:
mydestination = example.com, host.example.com, localhost
and do a postfix reload. Now, postfix won't do mx lookups when
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:56:47AM +0200, "M.Atıf CEYLAN" wrote:
> Everything is great but when I want to sending an email to a local
> domain, smtp server looks at the mx record of the domain. Can I use
> local transport and transport_maps together? Or is there a way to
> sending to local domains?
> smtpd = inbound
> smtp = outbound
cool! Thanks :-)
Pol
On 10/21/2013 6:55 AM, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> On 21.10.2013 07:56, Pol Hallen wrote:
>> Hey all :-)
>>
>> I'm sorry for banal question but I didn't find any answer to my question.
>>
>> In the /etc/postfix/main.cf I see many parameters like:
>>
>> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
>>
>> but also:
>>
>
+1
2013/10/21 Jeremy T. Bouse
> On 21.10.2013 07:56, Pol Hallen wrote:
>
>> Hey all :-)
>>
>> I'm sorry for banal question but I didn't find any answer to my question.
>>
>> In the /etc/postfix/main.cf I see many parameters like:
>>
>> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
>>
>> but also:
>>
>> smtp_sas
On 21.10.2013 07:56, Pol Hallen wrote:
Hey all :-)
I'm sorry for banal question but I didn't find any answer to my
question.
In the /etc/postfix/main.cf I see many parameters like:
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
but also:
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
So, what is the difference of smtpd_param
Things like that, with procmail, could cause several loops, especially
when is flavored with the "c" flag. You should consider use a solution
at postfix's level only.
Anyway, you could also do something with isabel's procmailrc, example:
/home/isabel/.procmailrc
And write inside this:
:0c
* Fro
You need to run newaliases command to rebuild the index.
http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html
On 19/07/2013 3:47 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> All day I receive an email from external account u...@external.com it
> reaches a user of my local domain isabel@mydomain, need to automatically
> be forwarded to
That reminds me of "awesome people hanging out together", Simone de
Beauvoir, Jean Paul Sartre and Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara (Cuba, 1960):
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmul2aM3m71qearaqo1_1280.jpg
_But_ the international mailing list for Debian is an English language
mailing list.
http://lists.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 May 2013 20:41:57 +0200
Pol Hallen wrote:
> > Don't remove both lines, only remove "virtual_alias_domains", the
> > "virtual_mailbox_domains" config setting should be there.
>
> I've same error:
>
> May 16 20:37:07 server1 postfix/smtpd[
> Don't remove both lines, only remove "virtual_alias_domains", the
> "virtual_mailbox_domains" config setting should be there.
I've same error:
May 16 20:37:07 server1 postfix/smtpd[19799]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com[77.238.189.211]: 550 5.1.1
: Recipient addres
On 5/16/2013 14:17, Pol Hallen wrote:
>> According to the documentation [0]:
>> "NEVER list a virtual MAILBOX domain name as a virtual ALIAS domain!"
>
> huh? ... ok
>
> I removed these 2 lines:
>
>> virtual_alias_domains = nuvolabianca.org
>> virtual_mailbox_domains = nuvolabianca.org
>
> now
> According to the documentation [0]:
> "NEVER list a virtual MAILBOX domain name as a virtual ALIAS domain!"
huh? ... ok
I removed these 2 lines:
> virtual_alias_domains = nuvolabianca.org
> virtual_mailbox_domains = nuvolabianca.org
now the mail bounces to sender, logs:
May 16 20:12:00 serve
On 5/16/2013 13:55, Pol Hallen wrote:
>> - output of `postconf -n`
>> - relevant logs from postfix (/var/log/mail.log)
>
> Sure! Thanks :-)
>
[::]
snip
> log:
>
> May 16 19:23:39 server1 postfix/pipe[15522]: 49AD3758239:
> to=, relay=spamassassin, delay=2.6,
> delays=0.37/0/0/2.2, dsn=2.0.0, sta
> - output of `postconf -n`
> - relevant logs from postfix (/var/log/mail.log)
Sure! Thanks :-)
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
always_bcc = c...@fuckaround.org
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
home_m
On 5/16/2013 13:35, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks :-)
>
> I don't understand why virtual host doesn't run :-/ I read many many
> howto but I can't resolve.
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> virtual_alias_domains = nuvolabianca.org
> virtual_mailbox_domains = nuvolabianca.org
> virtual_mailbox_base = /
> Are you after this parameter?
>
> queue_run_delay (default: 300s)
>The time between deferred queue scans by the queue manager;
> prior to Postfix 2.4 the default value was 1000s.
Understood!
thanks!
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:38:51PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> study postfix I didn't found how long is the attempt that try to send
> the mails within queue (how long is attempt?)
>
> I see this:
>
> maximal_queue_lifetime (default: 5d)
>
> Consider a message as undeliverable, whe
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:47:17AM +0200, Olivier BATARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering, after googling a lot, how to redirect mail from a
> user to another address without keeping mail to the original address.
> I want to redirect mail directly. I've tried aliases but mail are sent
> to both
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:47:17 +0200, Olivier BATARD wrote:
> I'm just wondering, after googling a lot, how to redirect mail from a
> user to another address without keeping mail to the original address. I
> want to redirect mail directly. I've tried aliases but mail are sent to
> both original and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 06.07.2012 12:47, Olivier BATARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering, after googling a lot, how to redirect mail from
> a user to another address without keeping mail to the original
> address. I want to redirect mail directly. I've tried alia
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:57:49 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 09/06/12 11:45, Camaleón wrote:
>> This was from your log:
>>
>> ***
>> Jun 8 16:54:15 shell postfix/trivial-rewrite[10957]: warning: do not
>> list domain vanderhoff.org in BOTH mydestination and
>> virtual_mailbox_domains
>> ***
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Tony van der Hoff
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/06/12 11:45, Camaleón wrote:
This was from your log:
***
Jun 8 16:54:15 shell postfix/trivial-rewrite[10
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> On 09/06/12 11:45, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
>>> This was from your log:
>>>
>>> ***
>>> Jun 8 16:54:15 shell postfix/trivial-rewrite[10957]: warning: do not
>>> list domain vanderhoff.org in BOT
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 09/06/12 11:45, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> This was from your log:
>>
>> ***
>> Jun 8 16:54:15 shell postfix/trivial-rewrite[10957]: warning: do not
>> list domain vanderhoff.org in BOTH mydestination and
>> virtual_mailbox_domains
>> ***
>
On 09/06/12 11:45, Camaleón wrote:
> This was from your log:
>
> ***
> Jun 8 16:54:15 shell postfix/trivial-rewrite[10957]: warning: do not
> list domain vanderhoff.org in BOTH mydestination and
> virtual_mailbox_domains
> ***
>
> It's almsot self-explicative :-)
>
Self-explanatory. Almost...
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:20:20 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 09/06/12 10:07, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Vi, 08 iun 12, 14:00:39, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrei, I don't use postfix (using instead the stock exim4) but would
>>> the OP's issue be resolved through:
>>>
>>> # dpkg-reco
On 09/06/12 10:07, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 08 iun 12, 14:00:39, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>
>> Andrei, I don't use postfix (using instead the stock exim4) but would
>> the OP's issue be resolved through:
>>
>> # dpkg-reconfigure postfix
>
> Don't know for sure, but it's worth a try.
>
> K
On Vi, 08 iun 12, 14:00:39, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>
> Andrei, I don't use postfix (using instead the stock exim4) but would
> the OP's issue be resolved through:
>
> # dpkg-reconfigure postfix
Don't know for sure, but it's worth a try.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Deb
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> Running squeeze on my VPS, and using postfix/dovecot/cyrus as my MTA,
> for a number of users, who pick up mail via IMAP (mostly Thunderbird).
> Postfix is configured to accept mail for u...@vanderhoff.org, as well as
> a few other domai
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
> On Vi, 08 iun 12, 14:52:06, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>>
>> So some misconfiguration somewhere, but I'm blowed if I can find it. Has
>> anyone any hints, please?
>
> /etc/mailname
>
> and the variables options 'myhostname' and 'mydestionation
On Vi, 08 iun 12, 14:52:06, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> So some misconfiguration somewhere, but I'm blowed if I can find it. Has
> anyone any hints, please?
/etc/mailname
and the variables options 'myhostname' and 'mydestionation' in
/etc/postfix/main.cf
This assuming a pretty standard postfi
On 08/06/12 15:30, Benjamin Martin wrote:
> On 08/06/12 13:52, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Running squeeze on my VPS, and using postfix/dovecot/cyrus as my MTA,
>> for a number of users, who pick up mail via IMAP (mostly Thunderbird).
>> Postfix is configured to accept mail for u...@vande
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:52:06 +0200, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Running squeeze on my VPS, and using postfix/dovecot/cyrus as my MTA,
> for a number of users, who pick up mail via IMAP (mostly Thunderbird).
> Postfix is configured to accept mail for u...@vanderhoff.org, as well as
> a few other dom
On 08/06/12 13:52, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi,
Running squeeze on my VPS, and using postfix/dovecot/cyrus as my MTA,
for a number of users, who pick up mail via IMAP (mostly Thunderbird).
Postfix is configured to accept mail for u...@vanderhoff.org, as well as
a few other domains.
I don't kno
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:03:25 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
>
>> I have a Debian-box well configured with
>> Postfix+saslauthd+dovecot+spamassassin. Mail accounts are virtual, with
>> password stored into MySQL and messages store into /home/vmail.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:03:25 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> I have a Debian-box well configured with
> Postfix+saslauthd+dovecot+spamassassin. Mail accounts are virtual, with
> password stored into MySQL and messages store into /home/vmail.
>
> I would like introduce maildrop in delivery chain,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:03:25AM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> Hello --
>
> I need some help in here :-/
>
> I have a Debian-box well configured with
> Postfix+saslauthd+dovecot+spamassassin. Mail accounts are virtual,
> with password stored into MySQL and messages store into /home/vmail.
>
On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:32:12 +0100, colona wrote:
> I use wheezy armel (2.6.36.2) on a sheevaplug and since I updated my
> system yesterday I can't send or receive emails anymore with postfix.
>
> This is what I get when I try to send an email :
>> postdrop: fatal: getrlimit: Operation not permit
On Mon, 02 May 2011 20:24:05 -0400, vr wrote:
>> Are there any reasons why you'd need postfix 2.8? Are there any
>> features
>> you require that are not available in 2.7?
>>
>>
> Would like to utilize Zombie blocker which became available in 2.8.
That sounds like a nice feature :-)
>> http://
Are there any reasons why you'd need postfix 2.8? Are there any
features
you require that are not available in 2.7?
Would like to utilize Zombie blocker which became available in 2.8.
http://backports.debian.org
Thank you for this. Unfortunately no results returned so it must not be
av
On Mon, 02 May 2011, vr wrote:
> In Squeeze I'm seeing Postfix 2.7.1-1 is the latest stable version.
> On the Postfix website 2.8.2 is listed as stable so it seems like a
> big gap.
Are there any reasons why you'd need postfix 2.8? Are there any features
you require that are not available in 2.7?
On 2011/5/1 21:41, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 01 May 2011 12:05:47 +0800, H Xu wrote:
On 05/01/2011 08:24 AM, H Xu wrote:
BTW, I was able to send mails from my domain to others, not still not
able to send a message from my domain to my domain.
I'm sorry, there is nothing wrong with the mail t
On Sun, 01 May 2011 12:05:47 +0800, H Xu wrote:
> On 05/01/2011 08:24 AM, H Xu wrote:
>> BTW, I was able to send mails from my domain to others, not still not
>> able to send a message from my domain to my domain.
>
> I'm sorry, there is nothing wrong with the mail transportation from one
> host
On 05/01/2011 08:24 AM, H Xu wrote:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:28:55 +0800, H Xu wrote:
(next time open a new thread so things don't get mixed...)
Thanks. I don't know how this new problem comes. Whatever coming mail
will be blocked by postfix:
Ap
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:28:55 +0800, H Xu wrote:
>
> (next time open a new thread so things don't get mixed...)
>
>> Thanks. I don't know how this new problem comes. Whatever coming mail
>> will be blocked by postfix:
>>
>> Apr 30 08:24:15 hostname
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:28:55 +0800, H Xu wrote:
>
> (next time open a new thread so things don't get mixed...)
>
>> Thanks. I don't know how this new problem comes. Whatever coming mail
>> will be blocked by postfix:
>>
>> Apr 30 08:24:15 hostname
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:28:55 +0800, H Xu wrote:
(next time open a new thread so things don't get mixed...)
> Thanks. I don't know how this new problem comes. Whatever coming mail
> will be blocked by postfix:
>
> Apr 30 08:24:15 hostname postfix/smtpd[3443]: match_hostname:
> mail-pw0-f54.google
On 2011/4/30 18:15, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:06:06 +0800, H Xu wrote:
I've just configured a smtp server on Debian 6.0.1, but the smtp auth
always fails. Here is the log from mail.log:
Apr 29 05:05:49 hostname postfix/smtpd[13269]: warning: SASL
authentication failure: cannot con
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
