Re: matrox G400 driver missing

2003-11-18 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:01, Tom Allison wrote: > I was trying to get my x-window-server installed last night and ran > into a seemingly dumb problem. > > I have a minimalist installation with sources.list have both stable > and testing entries. > > I used tasksel to select X-Window system an

Re: Matrox G400 Hardware Acceleration

2002-04-07 Thread Tom Allison
Michael J. Madden wrote: Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400 working under Woody. I am using XFree86 4.1.0-14 with kernel 2.4.18. I keep getting the following message in XFree86.0.log and glxinfo reports direct rendering is disabled. (==) MGA(0): Direct rendering disable

Re: Matrox G400 Hardware Acceleration

2002-04-07 Thread Michael J. Madden
As soon as I mailed this I figured it out. I needed to compile in the Matrox driver into my 2.4.18 kernel. I had the AGP support but no Matrox support. Thanks, Mike On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:29:10AM -0500, Michael J. Madden wrote: > Has anyone gotten hardware acceleration for the Matrox G400

Re: Matrox G400 problem with Woody and X

2002-03-25 Thread Faheem Mitha
On 24 Mar 2002, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: > I have just installed Woody from the network install CDROMs. > > When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found. > > Is this an X configuration problem, compilation problem, or a kernel > problem? Dear Randolph, Your message is n

Re: Matrox G400 problem with Woody and X

2002-03-24 Thread Simon Hepburn
Randolph S. Kahle wrote: > When I try to start X, I am told the mga_hal module can not be found. You need to get the linux drivers from the matrox support site if you want this lib. You might like this: apt-cache show mgapdesk Simon Hepburn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: matrox g400 X problem

2002-03-21 Thread Good Times
this was the right thing this led me to read throught he xinerama howto and now things are better than they were before as i now have proper xinerama support thanks on Thu, 21 Mar 2002 Simon Hepburn typed > You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible. > > Simon

Re: matrox g400 X problem

2002-03-21 Thread Simon Hepburn
You are trying to use Xinerama and 3D accel together. They are incompatible. Simon Hepburn.

Re: Matrox G400 & DRI

2001-11-20 Thread Sean
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 20:16, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following in my XFree86.0.log: > (EE) MGA(0): [dri] MGADRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch. > [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed. > [dri] Disabling DRI. > > How can I fix it? > Where

Re: Matrox G400 DualHead

2001-11-20 Thread Matthew Reath
Alex, I've been requesting some information on the Linux Support Forum at Matrox.  The list is very helpful and is a free signup.  I'm hoping between this list and the matrox list I can get some help. Because we both know that the Linux Power Desk and Drivers don't seem to directly suppo

Re: Matrox G400 DualHead

2001-11-20 Thread Oleksandr Moskalenko
* Matthew Reath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I installed Debian potato on a system with a Matrox G400 DualHead. > > I was wondering if anybody has worked with the Matrox Power Desk and > drivers for XFree86. > > I want to setup a TV on the secondary display that I can use Xine/Xawtv > on full s

Fwd: Re: Matrox G400 dri woes

2001-08-03 Thread Nuhn Yobiznez
--- Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 02:26:32 -0700 (PDT) > From: Nuhn Yobiznez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Matrox G400 dri woes > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --- Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &

Re: Matrox G400 dri woes

2001-08-03 Thread Sebastian Drews
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I try to run X with the mga_drv.o that comes with XFree86 or the one > from Matrox website I get this error: The driver from matrox is for XFree86 4.0.2/4.0.3. > [dri] mga.o kernel module version is 2.0.1 but version 3.0.x is needed. Compile a

Re: Matrox G400 dri woes

2001-08-03 Thread Chun Kit Edwin Lau
Try the source at dri.sourceforge.net. It works for me. I did the following 1. d/l matrox mga_drv.o and mga_hal.o from matrox site 2. copy them to the appropriate x11 directory 3. d/l the dri from dri.sourceforge.net 4. compile the mga.o by make -f Makefile mga.o 5. cp mga.o to the appropriate /lib

Re: Matrox G400 3d HW acceleration under Woody

2001-06-08 Thread Thibaut Cousin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You need to change things in two places : 1) In XF86Config-4, section "Module", add a line : Load "dri" and in section "DRI" add a line : Mode 0666 2) In /etc/modules, you must load two modules so add two lines : agpgart

Re: Matrox G400 3d HW acceleration under Woody

2001-06-03 Thread Lee Elliott
Dominique Deleris wrote: > > Hello... > > I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400 > card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play > SOF (soldier of fortune). > > When I start the game, it is relly slow :(, no > acceleration at all. > > Her

Re: Matrox G400 3d HW acceleration under Woody

2001-06-03 Thread Sean Morgan
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 07:41:49PM +0200, Dominique Deleris wrote: > Hello... > > I'd like to play games with my Woody box : I have a Matrox G400 > card, and I'd really appreciate to get HW 3d acceleration to play > SOF (soldier of fortune). > > When I start the game, it is relly slow

Re: Matrox G400

2000-08-27 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know what is > the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400. XF86_SVGA is the best for any Matrox video card --

Re: Matrox G400

2000-08-27 Thread brian moore
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 01:31:43PM -0500, Paul T. McNally wrote: > I'm replacing my RedHat system with Potato and want to know > what is the best XServer to run with my Matrox G400. The same one that you would run on RH: SVGA. (And, yes, it -is- accelerated. Despite the name, the SVGA server is

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-25 Thread Brian May
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes: Eric> Well, I only know that Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt Eric> has this to say: Documentation/fb/vesafb.txt says this: 1. Note: LILO cannot handle hex, for booting directly with "vga=mode-number" you have to transform the numbers to deci

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-25 Thread Tom Marshall
> > Here is my lilo.conf: > > > > boot=/dev/hda > > root=/dev/hda1 > > compact > > install=/boot/boot.b > > map=/boot/map > > delay=20 > > vga=normal > > > > image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16 > > append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192" >

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-25 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 03:25:56PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes: > > >> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16 append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192" > Eric> ^ See > Eric> /Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt (that should be a >

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-25 Thread Brian May
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes: >> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16 append="video=matrox:vesa:0x192" Eric> ^ See Eric> /Documentation/fb/matroxfb.txt (that should be a Eric> decimal number in lilo.conf, like: Eric> append="video=matr

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-25 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:03:01AM -0700, Tom Marshall wrote: > Here is the console section from "make menuconfig" in my 2.2.16 kernel: > > [*] VGA text console > [*] Video mode selection support > < > MDA text console (dual-headed) (EXPERIMENTAL) > [*] Support for frame bu

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-24 Thread Tom Marshall
Here is the console section from "make menuconfig" in my 2.2.16 kernel: [*] VGA text console [*] Video mode selection support < > MDA text console (dual-headed) (EXPERIMENTAL) [*] Support for frame buffer devices (EXPERIMENTAL) [ ] Permedia2 support (experimental)

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-21 Thread Charles Lewis
Sorry, should have said something about that. Currently running 2.2.17pre6, so that shouldn't be the problem... > > Maybe try to upgrade your kernel? > What kernel are you running? > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:18:08PM -0500, Charles Lewis wrote: > > In your kernel unders console drivers/Matro

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-21 Thread Marcin Kurc
Maybe try to upgrade your kernel? What kernel are you running? On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:18:08PM -0500, Charles Lewis wrote: > In your kernel unders console drivers/Matrox acceleration did you enable > Millenium I/II support, Mystique support, or G100/G200 support? There is no > other options

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-21 Thread Charles Lewis
In your kernel unders console drivers/Matrox acceleration did you enable Millenium I/II support, Mystique support, or G100/G200 support? There is no other options (besides multihead support which I have enabled). chas > Sure, it works fine. > > matroxfb: Matrox unknown G400 (AGP) detected > matr

Re: Matrox G400 not supported in kernel?

2000-07-21 Thread Tom Marshall
Sure, it works fine. matroxfb: Matrox unknown G400 (AGP) detected matroxfb: MTRR's turned on matroxfb: 1152x864x16bpp (virtual: 1152x7280) matroxfb: framebuffer at 0xE200, mapped to 0xd0005000, size 16777216 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x54 fb0: MATROX VGA frame buffer d

Re: Matrox G400 and X (was: debian-user-digest ...)

1999-10-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On 21/10/99 Rune Linding Raun wrote: xfree86 server for matrox g400max does it exist? The SVGA server supports this card, it is listed in the XF86Config program so you should have no problems. (if you do upgrade to Xfree 3.3.5) Best Regards, Ethan Benson To obtain my PGP key: http://ww

Re: Matrox G400

1999-08-31 Thread Jonathan H. Wheaton
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Alexis Maldonado wrote: > Hello! > > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 05:54:04PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 08:02:16PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > > | > G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having > > | > support

Re: Matrox G400

1999-08-30 Thread markzimm
I'm using one now and it works great. You need the 3.3.4 SVGA server. I am running slink so I updated X to the 3.3.3 debian packages at netgod.net and the 3.3.4 SVGA server direct from xfree86.org. -- Mark On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 05:25:58PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to get a n

RE: Matrox G400

1999-08-30 Thread B. Szyszka
> If you are interested in the Matrox G400, maybe you'll like one of the > boards with the TNT2 chipset from Nvidia. One friend of mine just got a > Diamond Viper V770 Ultra (It costs the same as the Matrox G400), and It runs > fine in X using the Xserver downloaded from the Nvidia site. Nvidia gav

Re: Matrox G400

1999-08-30 Thread Alexis Maldonado
Hello! On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 05:54:04PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 08:02:16PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > | > G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having > | > support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well. > | Does the amount of MB

Re: Matrox G400

1999-08-30 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 08:02:16PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: | > G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having | > support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well. | Does the amount of MB part make a difference? I was thinking about | a G400 32MB. It wasn't listed i

RE: Matrox G400

1999-08-30 Thread B. Szyszka
> G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having > support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well. Does the amount of MB part make a difference? I was thinking about a G400 32MB. -- Bart Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:4982727 B Grafyx http://www.bgrafyx.com L.J.R.

Re: Matrox G400

1999-08-29 Thread Eric G. Miller
G200 8MB AGP, works great. I show XFree86 version 3.3.3.1 having support for G400 16MB video. I'd guess it also works well.

Re: matrox g400

1999-06-15 Thread Matthew Gregan
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 07:36:32PM -0500, Aaron Solochek wrote: > I realize this isn't a great place to ask this... but I'm considering > getting the g400. I was wonding if anyone knows, or can make an > educated guess as to weather or not this will work with X at all. > I assume that the drivers