> (WW) Open APM failed
> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module mga_hal
> (WW) MGA(0): Video BIOS info block not detected!
> (EE) MGA: Failed to load module "mga_hal" (module does not exist, 0)
>
> Just in case it would shed any light, I am running Athlon on Biostar
> M7MKA motherboard...
>
> Thanks
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 12:23:23AM -0500, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
>
> Eugene,
>
> To my untrained eye this log doesn't really show if dri was loaded. I
> had the same log, but dri didn't work on my G400. I apologize if I
> needlesly reiterate what you've already done, but I believe that in
* Eugene Tyurin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having trouble with this strange error message from bzflag (.deb
> 1.7e2-1) and GL in general:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ bzflag
> libGL error: failed to open DRM: Operation not permitted
> libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect r
PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: G400
Kris Huber said:
> If anyone has an idea why my Matrox G400 output isn't always
> looking great under v3.3.6, I'd appreciate suggestions! It's not
> too bad, but a little annoying.
i ran it under xfree 3.3.6 up unt
> I recently changed from using the unstable distribution to the stable
> one. In the process I ended up changing from XFree86 v4 to v3.3.6. I
> never noticed any display problems under v4, yet under v3.3.6 I've
> noticed that vertical colored lines sometimes appear when areas are
> "re-painted"
Kris Huber said:
> If anyone has an idea why my Matrox G400 output isn't always
> looking great under v3.3.6, I'd appreciate suggestions! It's not
> too bad, but a little annoying.
i ran it under xfree 3.3.6 up until about 50 days ago,
it ran perfect. never had a single drawing issue. i don't
us
I have a G400 and know that there is support in X v4. In fact I believe the
support in v4 is better than in v3.3.6.
I recently changed from using the unstable distribution to the stable one.
In the process I ended up changing from XFree86 v4 to v3.3.6. I never
noticed any display problems under
* Tom Allison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have this Matrox G400 video card that's supposed to be really spiffy
> (or was, in it's day).
> I'm just trying to confirm the support in X v4.
>
> It seems that this card has taken a serious step back in basic
> performance. I'm not talking about fr
Sorry, that should have been private mail.
/Allan
--
Allan M. Wind email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.O. Box 2022 finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GPG/PGP)
Woburn, MA 01888-0022
USA
pgpE185wSOlOt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2001-03-21 21:42:32, Nuhn Yobiznez wrote:
> Have you looked in your /var/log/XFree86.log to see if
> it is enabling DRI?
I have a couple of DRI lines:
(II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI
(II) MGA(0): Offscreen memory usage will be limited to 512 lines if the DRI is
enabled.
> What kernel are
Mike Cathcart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Well, ok, I lied, but who was going to read another boring email about the
> G400 and DRI? Well, enough for sensationalistic email...
[ snip ]
> glxinfo output:
>
[ snip ]
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> OpenGL version string:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 02:38:15AM -0500, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> Apparently, my g400max, with kernel 2.2.14, doesn't like videomodes over
> 8bit color. The computer boots with whatever video mode I want, but
> will not sync if the color depth is greater than 8 bits. I can drive
> the monitor at
Well, for what its worth, I am using a g400max with no problem, but not with
xfree, with
acceleratedX.
-Aaron Solochek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg Schulein wrote:
> On the contrary, every reply helps. If others are using the G400
> successfully, I'll conclude my card is defective and get a replace
On the contrary, every reply helps. If others are using the G400
successfully, I'll conclude my card is defective and get a replacement.
Thanks,
Greg
Mark Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I'm using a G400 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with XFree86 3.3.5 and have
> no problems with it. My monitor is a Sony 400PS. I
I'm using a G400 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with XFree86 3.3.5 and have
no problems with it. My monitor is a Sony 400PS. I also recall that I
used 3.3.4 for a time without incident. The 3.3.4 experience was with
slink; now using potato.
Sorry to have been no help.
- Mark
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 07:13:
I noticed this warning also. The mga_24bpp_fix option didn't help my
problem, though.
Thanks,
Greg
aphro wrote:
>
> I'm not a matrox user myself(yet) but i do see this:
>
> http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.4/MGA4.html#5
>
>On some Millennium II cards the driver shows severe distortions with
> 2
I'm not a matrox user myself(yet) but i do see this:
http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.4/MGA4.html#5
On some Millennium II cards the driver shows severe distortions with
24bpp in modes above about 1024x768. We hope to have automated the
detection and fix of this problem. If it still occurs, putting
17 matches
Mail list logo
