On 11/30/08 01:05, Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 18:32, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
involved in the use of Framemaker to make "bo
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 18:32, Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
> involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
>
> I have little
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
> involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
>
> I have little more information about her application at presen
Hendrik Boom wrote:
I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems she's
involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
I have little more information about her application at present, but I
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:32:58 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I have friend who's interested in trying out free software. Her
> immediate request is for something to replace Framemaker. It seems
> she's involved in the use of Framemaker to make "books" for salesmen.
>
> I have little more informat
Hello,
Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Syrus, could you please tell us how you got FrameMaker running? I have a
>potato system, upgraded weekely using apt-get. FrameMaker will not run
>at all, I get no error messages, I just get the $ prompt back again. Am
>I perhaps missing some vit
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm. Framemaker is running fine on my potato system. It does not seem
> > to
> > run over remote X, at least to a system running in 16 bit color depth.
> > However, it certainly works under the co
Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Framemaker is running fine on my potato system. It does not seem
> to
> run over remote X, at least to a system running in 16 bit color depth.
> However, it certainly works under the correct set of circumstances.
> The
> problem is not with t
On 19 Dec 1999, Paul Seelig wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Brutsche) writes:
>
> > > Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
> >
> > It does say that. It also say's it'll work with glibc 2.0.7, which is
> > what slink uses. Imagine my disappointment...
> >
> Tha
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 07:27:11 -0600 (CST), Phil Brutsche wrote:
>A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
>> Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
>
>It does say that. It also say's it'll work with glibc 2.0.7, which is
>what slink uses. Imagine
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
It does say that. It also say's it'll work with glibc 2.0.7, which is
what slink uses. Imagine my disappointment...
--
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:51:17 -0600 (CST), Phil Brutsche wrote:
>I can't run FrameMaker either with my slink setup; chances are that it's a
>glibc2.1 binary, which is why it works under potato.
Well, it explicitly SAYS so on the website that it's a 2.1.2 binary.
--
Sign the EU petition against
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> > installed it under Debian/slink. Unfortunately it doesn't run because
> > it is linked to the following libraries which are not available under
> > Debian (even not with potato):
>
> I can't answer your question about slink, but I ha
"Christopher S. Swingley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > installed it under Debian/slink. Unfortunately it doesn't run because
> > it is linked to the following libraries which are not available under
> > Debian (even not with potato):
>
> I can't answer your question about slink, but I had no t
> installed it under Debian/slink. Unfortunately it doesn't run because
> it is linked to the following libraries which are not available under
> Debian (even not with potato):
I can't answer your question about slink, but I had no trouble installing
the FrameMaker demo under potato (apt-getted t
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 03:10:38PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> I have written to Adobe and they have informed me that no Linux version of
> FramMaker exists or is planned.
FrameMaker is being developed using gcc, and there has been a usenet posting
by one of the Adobe engineers that it would be
I have written to Adobe and they have informed me that no Linux version of
FramMaker exists or is planned.
On 21-Feb-98 Ralph Winslow wrote:
> Is there a Debian package of FrameMaker or something that does
> the same kinds of things? I've started using it a work and
> would like to practice usi
17 matches
Mail list logo
