On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 09:30:08AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 03 ian 21, 19:53:07, Michael Stone wrote:
Applications which need more data integrity
guarantees generally implement some sort of journalling and/or use atomic
filesystem operations. (E.g., write a temporary file, flush/sync,
On Du, 03 ian 21, 19:53:07, Michael Stone wrote:
>
> Applications which need more data integrity
> guarantees generally implement some sort of journalling and/or use atomic
> filesystem operations. (E.g., write a temporary file, flush/sync,
> rename--that guarantees either the old file or the new
On Du, 03 ian 21, 13:43:00, David Christensen wrote:
>
> I would postulate that copy-on-write technology could be/ is already
> included in journaling file systems to improve efficiency.
Copy-on-write (btrfs, ZFS) is different than journaling (ext4, xfs,
etc.).
As fas as I understand copy-on-wr
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:25:40AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
That would mean all data is written to the disk twice and would make a
journaling file system twice as slow compared to a non-journaling file
system; the journal is typically on the same storage.
That's almost never how it's actual
>> AIUI a journaling filesystem provides a two-step process to achieve atomic
>> writes of multiple sectors to disk -- e.g. a process wants to put some data
>> into a block here (say, a file), a block there (say, a directory), etc., and
>> consistency of the on-disk data structures must be preserve
On 2021-01-03 01:25, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 ian 21, 13:35:06, David Christensen wrote:
AIUI a journaling filesystem provides a two-step process to achieve atomic
writes of multiple sectors to disk -- e.g. a process wants to put some data
into a block here (say, a file), a block there
On Sb, 02 ian 21, 13:35:06, David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-02 03:24, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > http://www.unixsheikh.com/articles/battle-testing-data-integrity-verification-with-zfs-btrfs-and-mdadm-dm-integrity.html
>
> That looks interesting. Thanks for the link. :-)
>
>
> On 2021-0
On 2021-01-02 03:24, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
http://www.unixsheikh.com/articles/battle-testing-data-integrity-verification-with-zfs-btrfs-and-mdadm-dm-integrity.html
That looks interesting. Thanks for the link. :-)
On 2021-01-02 08:08, Richard Hector wrote:
On 3/01/21 12:24 am, Andrei POPES
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 09:23:02AM -0600, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Im afraid I have to agree with this advice. In the presence of software
> like ZFS (from Sun) and LVM (from IBM's AIX), with easy availability of
> NAS, SAN and cloud storage, the arguments in favor of hardware RAID local
> to a
On Saturday 02 January 2021 11:08:52 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 3/01/21 12:24 am, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Sb, 02 ian 21, 01:40:14, David Christensen wrote:
> >> On Linux (including Debian), MD (multiple disk) and LVM (logical
> >> volume manager) are the obvious choices for software RAID. Ea
p) and boot off of a pair of SD cards or a
BOSS-card containing 2 NVMe modules. (While the latter is kind-of a
RAID controller, it is as simple as they get.)
For Windows servers, the water gets a bit muddles by the existance of
"Storage Spaces", which is more like LVM an Linux, allowing fo
On 3/01/21 12:24 am, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 ian 21, 01:40:14, David Christensen wrote:
On Linux (including Debian), MD (multiple disk) and LVM (logical volume
manager) are the obvious choices for software RAID. Each have their
respective learning curves, but they're not too high.
An
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021, 5:49 AM Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> My advise: Don't bother "learning RAID controllers".
>
Im afraid I have to agree with this advice. In the presence of software
like ZFS (from Sun) and LVM (from IBM's AIX), with easy availability of
NAS, SAN and cloud storage, the arguments in
RAID controllers are on their way out, a thing of the
past.
Performance-wise, MD-RAID or ZFS on Linux is faster than doing the same
via a RAID controller, while at the same time having far less
complexity and failure points.
RAID controllers need a prioprietary tool to configure and maintain
them
On Sb, 02 ian 21, 01:40:14, David Christensen wrote:
>
> On Linux (including Debian), MD (multiple disk) and LVM (logical volume
> manager) are the obvious choices for software RAID. Each have their
> respective learning curves, but they're not too high.
An interesting article I stumbled upon:
h
On 2021-01-02 00:11, Steven Mainor wrote:
All,
thanks for all the help so far. For all the people asking why, a few
reasons. First I love to tinker with and learn about things and the only
raid controller I have access to is on my production server and I don't
really get to "pla
Steven Mainor wrote:
> I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
> controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
> source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome, thanks.
>
I recommend installing two control
wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome,
thanks.
Why?
What is your computer?
What Debian?
What Linux?
What app
stion?
---
Steven Mainor
On 2021-01-01 15:03, David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-01 10:06, Steven Mainor wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop com
All,
thanks for all the help so far. For all the people asking why, a few
reasons. First I love to tinker with and learn about things and the only
raid controller I have access to is on my production server and I don't
really get to "play" with it much since it is in use 24
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 01:06:47PM -0500, Steven Mainor wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome,
thanks.
Re
On 2021-01-01 10:06, Steven Mainor wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome, thanks.
Why?
What is your computer?
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Steven Mainor wrote:
>> I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
>> controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
>> source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome,
>> th
On 01.01.2021 23:06, Steven Mainor wrote:
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome, thanks.
Over the years I've been fo
Steven Mainor wrote:
> I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
> controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open source
> drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome, thanks.
Having used them for 20+ years now, I stro
I'm looking for recommendations for a 6 or 8 port SATA hardware raid
controller that will hopefully be supported by the kernel and/or open
source drivers to put in my desktop computer. Any input welcome, thanks.
--
Steven Mainor
0x9477C19B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signatur
Hi back,
Am 2018-04-17 hackte Dan Ritter in die Tasten:
> The LSI Megaraid controllers have worked very well for me. They
> are now owned by Broadcom.
>
> The current model is 9361-16i. Previous generations still work
> well, especially for spinning disks, and are available under the
> Avago and S
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:33 am Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:55:20AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Hello *,
> >
> > very long time ago (17 years) I used 3Ware Hardware Raid Controller where
> > most are working up to now and they are not broken ye
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:55:20AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> very long time ago (17 years) I used 3Ware Hardware Raid Controller where
> most are working up to now and they are not broken yet.
>
> However, for all newer installations I use Adaptec and espec
Hello *,
very long time ago (17 years) I used 3Ware Hardware Raid Controller where
most are working up to now and they are not broken yet.
However, for all newer installations I use Adaptec and especially the
71506E which is a low-cost hardware Raid-0/1/10 Controller. I have 8 of
them and now
On Oct 30, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
> I got it to work with "acpi=off" on Ubuntu 12.04.
>
On Dec 28, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Ron wrote:
>
> Setting linux kernel boot parameter pci=conf1 allows my Intel RAID
> Controller-RMS25PB080 (LSI 2208/Fusion based
On Dec 28, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Is there a question in here somewhere? Otherwise you have sent it to the
> wrong list.
Yes. This is part of a larger thread that's a result of a question I asked.
http://debian.2.n7.nabble.com/Wheezy-Driver-for-Intel-RMS2
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 05:02:49PM -0800, Ron wrote:
>
> Setting linux kernel boot parameter pci=conf1 allows my Intel RAID
> Controller-RMS25PB080 (LSI 2208/Fusion based) to be detected, and the FW to
> transition to Ready state. Without this setting the Card FW responds only
>
Setting linux kernel boot parameter pci=conf1 allows my Intel RAID
Controller-RMS25PB080 (LSI 2208/Fusion based) to be detected, and the FW to
transition to Ready state. Without this setting the Card FW responds only
with 0xF000 Fault (Masked).
I found linux kernel series 3.0.0, properly
I got it to work with "acpi=off" on Ubuntu 12.04.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/8e94dd82-4044-4b8c-b0a9-8c46630bc...@stanford.edu
On Oct 22, 2012, at 2:42 PM, r...@microway.com wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Have you tried updating the firmware on the card? I've found that LSI
> based cards often ship with really old firmware. For the Intel module you
> listed, you should be able to download the firmware here:
>
> http://downlo
[6.397232] megaraid_sas :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 26 (level,
>> low) -> IRQ 26
>> [6.397677] megaraid_sas :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
>> [6.397721] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI)
>> Driver
>> [6.39779
cy timer to 64
> [6.397721] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
> [6.397798] megasas: Waiting for FW to come to ready state
> [6.397800] megasas: FW in FAULT state!!
> [6.397822] megaraid_sas :01:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
But the raid
any luck getting this family of new Intel RAID drivers working
>> in Debian Wheezy?
>>
>> It uses the LSI raid controller:
>> LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2208 [Thunderbolt]
>>
>> But the wheezy kernel's stock megaraid_sas driver does not seem to s
is excluded. I posted several days ago but no one has replied about
why isci is missing on the latest Debian testing release.
Rick
> Anyone have any luck getting this family of new Intel RAID drivers working
> in Debian Wheezy?
>
> It uses the LSI raid controller:
> LSI Logic / S
Anyone have any luck getting this family of new Intel RAID drivers working in
Debian Wheezy?
It uses the LSI raid controller:
LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2208 [Thunderbolt]
But the wheezy kernel's stock megaraid_sas driver does not seem to support this
card.
I've down
PS: And full ACK that sometimes hardware is supported by outdated
drivers, e.g. some ATI drivers need outdated versions of X. New ATI
drivers won't support old cards anymore. And "OLD" is very relative. So
you can use those cards for all tasks, you "SIMPLY" need to maintain
your Linux working with
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 09:44 +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
> That's not 100% reliable.
!!! Very important. Especially grey and white lists for Linux compatible
hardware only provide coarse information. !!!
More safe are blacklists.
I owned and still own white listed gear that doesn't work. S
installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any clue to this
issue?
Please let me know if anyone needs any further information.
A quality sysadmin would have checked and ironed out OS compatibility
issues before ever ordering
On 10/13/2012 8:12 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2012 12:42:52 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>> What is the difference between drivers and firmware blobs.
>
> I actually said "binary blob". I would not have used the term "firmware
> blob". In fact, that is the first time that I have seen it
er is unable to detect the RAID Controller
> and NIC Card. Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any
> clue to this issue?
> Please let me know if anyone needs any further information.
I am a bit surprised that you install a server without knowing to look for
hardware dri
On Saturday 13 October 2012 12:42:52 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> What is the difference between drivers and firmware blobs.
I actually said "binary blob". I would not have used the term "firmware blob".
In fact, that is the first time that I have seen it used. Firmware is just
firmware! (And no
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 15:57 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > They need binary blobs?
>
> Not sure i understand about binary blobs.
Driver software
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
>>> http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/dell-poweredge-r720-spec-sheet.pdf),
>>> the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
>>> Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any clue to this
>>> issue?
>>> Ple
edge-r720-spec-sheet.pdf),
>> the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
>> Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any clue to this
>> issue?
>> Please let me know if anyone needs any further information.
>
> A quality sysadmin wo
On 10/13/2012 5:06 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> I am installing Debian 6.0.0 squeeze with kernel version
> 2.6.32-5-amd64 on Dell R720 2U server(
> http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/dell-poweredge-r720-spec-sheet.pdf),
> the installer is unable to detect the RAID Co
On Sat 13 Oct 2012 at 15:57:06 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Lisi wrote:
>
> > They need binary blobs?
>
> Not sure i understand about binary blobs.
You would if you looked to see what the Installer Manual has to say
about firmware.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2012 11:06:45 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>> the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
>> Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any clue to this
>> issue?
>
Hi Lisi
On Saturday 13 October 2012 11:06:45 Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
> Details of lspci -> http://paste.debian.net/199820/ Any clue to this
> issue?
They need binary blobs? You can choose to install them via a USB key
Hi,
I am installing Debian 6.0.0 squeeze with kernel version
2.6.32-5-amd64 on Dell R720 2U server(
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/dell-poweredge-r720-spec-sheet.pdf),
the installer is unable to detect the RAID Controller and NIC Card.
Details of lspci -> h
Hello Debian Users:
Have there been any instances where a RAID controller wiped out data
in particular the logical drives it creates are no longer able to use.
The only solution is to recreate the logical drive?
Just curious.
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
Pigeon a écrit :
>
> It doesn't work with 2.4 kernels :-(
>
As I wrote, I'm using Kenshi MUTO's custom kernel ( http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i/
).
It provides 2.6.20 kernels for Sarge.
By the way, Maarten gave me this link, it may help someone besides me.
http://www.uta.fi/~pauli.borodulin/delloms
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:31:26AM +0100, Samuel Krieg wrote:
> Maarten Vink a ?crit :
> >
> > Apart from that omreport will also give you information on fan speeds,
> > temperature, installed hardware, etc. It also installs an SNMP agent
> > that allows you to monitor RAID status, fan speeds, tem
Maarten Vink a écrit :
>
> Apart from that omreport will also give you information on fan speeds,
> temperature, installed hardware, etc. It also installs an SNMP agent
> that allows you to monitor RAID status, fan speeds, temperature, etc via
> SNMP. The SNMP agent is disabled by default, but is
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:10:08PM +0100, Andraz Sraka wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:50 +0100, Maarten Vink wrote:
Add deb ftp://ftp.sara.nl/pub/sara-omsa dell sara to /etc/apt/
Setting up openipmi (2.0.7-1) ...
Setting up dellomsa (5.2.0-2) ...
Checking that /etc/ld.so.conf contains required
re
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 05:18 -0400, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Are they proprietry? If not, you can get the rpm and use the Debian
> package "alien" to convert it.
yes, but still what to install? I've tried with dellomsa_5.x, but
without any luck at all.
regards,
Andraz
--
Humppa all the way
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> are there any diagnostic/monitoring tools in linux (debian etch for
> instance) for monitoring Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller. I found that
> there are some utilities for RHEL/SuSE enterprise distrib
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:13:37AM +0100, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 10:49 +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > afaapps_2.6-3_i386.deb from http://www.brandl.net/pe2550/ works for me
> > on the etch kernel. Also, the kernel logs any problems that appear, so
> > logcheck will do for hea
re
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 10:49 +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> afaapps_2.6-3_i386.deb from http://www.brandl.net/pe2550/ works for me
> on the etch kernel. Also, the kernel logs any problems that appear, so
> logcheck will do for healh monitoring.
Are you sure that this tool works with PERC 5/i?!
re
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 12:50 +0100, Maarten Vink wrote:
> Add deb ftp://ftp.sara.nl/pub/sara-omsa dell sara to /etc/apt/
> sources.list and apt-get install dellomsa. This will get you the Dell
> monitoringtools; the omreport-tool will get you all sorts of info on
> the raidcontroller:
Settin
Op 27-okt-2007, om 18:19 heeft Andraz Sraka het volgende geschreven:
Hello people,
are there any diagnostic/monitoring tools in linux (debian etch for
instance) for monitoring Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller. I found that
there are some utilities for RHEL/SuSE enterprise distribution. Has
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Andraz Sraka wrote:
> instance) for monitoring Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller. I found that
> there are some utilities for RHEL/SuSE enterprise distribution. Has
> anyone managed to see status of controller in Debian? What tools do I
> need to
Hello people,
are there any diagnostic/monitoring tools in linux (debian etch for
instance) for monitoring Dell PERC 5/i RAID controller. I found that
there are some utilities for RHEL/SuSE enterprise distribution. Has
anyone managed to see status of controller in Debian? What tools do I
need to
We're trying to install Debian at work onto a SuperMicro box with one of these controllers (Ultra320 SCSI RAID) on it. When we build the RAID in hardware, it's not recognized by the installation kernel - instead it recognizes the four physical drives that are installed.
Can anyone give me any tips
On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 00:57 +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:00 -0700, Gary Catalano wrote:
> > Is the Adaptec hardware raid controller (I'm thinking of getting a
> > 2410SA) supported in the 2.6 kernel?
>
> If you're talking about the *curr
Title: Adaptec Hardware Raid Controller
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:00 -0700, Gary Catalano wrote:
Is the Adaptec hardware raid controller (I'm thinking of getting a 2410SA) supported in the 2.6 kernel?
If you're talking about the *current* 2.6 kernel, yes:
:02:09.
Title: Adaptec Hardware Raid Controller
Is the Adaptec hardware raid controller (I'm thinking of getting a 2410SA) supported in the 2.6 kernel?
Gary Catalano
IT Manager
Cryptic Studios
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
have a look to /boot/config-2.4... and /boot/config-2.6..., compare the
options for IDE, HD, DMA, UDMA and report and adapt the config.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enig
Hello Marco,
Am 2006-01-04 12:14:17, schrieb Marco Neves:
> Hi ppl,
> I thought that a Raid5 with several smaller disks would solve
> our problem,
it depends
> but that brings me other. I would need a raid controller, that do it
> by
> hardware, not that sh*t t
rap sold as hotswap bays, the hotswap bay quality
is *extremely* important. If you can, get a SAF-TE bay and SAF-TE aware
RAID controller, they will be top-notch hardware.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them
d5 with several smaller disks would solve our
> problem,
> but that brings me other. I would need a raid controller, that do it by
> hardware, not that sh*t that (at least some) Promise/FastTrack controllers do
> (or what I managed to make them do - raid by software), and that at the
h several smaller disks would solve our
> problem,
> but that brings me other. I would need a raid controller, that do it by
> hardware, not that sh*t that (at least some) Promise/FastTrack controllers do
> (or what I managed to make them do - raid by software), and that at the sa
y, and we need both a
> lot of
> diskspace (for shared files, software backups, devel repository, etc) and
> some security on disk failures.
>
> I thought that a Raid5 with several smaller disks would solve our
> problem,
> but that brings me other. I would need a raid c
that brings me other. I would need a raid controller, that do it by
hardware, not that sh*t that (at least some) Promise/FastTrack controllers do
(or what I managed to make them do - raid by software), and that at the same
work with debian as "out of the box" as possible.
One
I have the appropriate driver
for my ATA/RAID controller built into the kernel (not a module):
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW=y
I am also using a 2.4.29 kernel from the linux-2.4.29.tar.gz from
kernel.org. Again, the appropriate driver for my ATA/RAID controller
is built into the kernel (no
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Money really does == speed.
sorta... depends ..
i'd say it's more like:
technology + know-how == speed | price | performance | reliability | capacity
( choose 4 of the 5 criteria )
killers would be :
namebrand + marketing/advertising hipe =
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:44 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Am 2005-11-15 07:54:47, schrieb David Kirchner:
>
> > We haven't tried Raptors yet. We're waiting for the capacities to
> > approach that of the other SATA drives. As it is now the pricing on
> > the Raptors isn't low enou
Hi David,
Am 2005-11-15 07:54:47, schrieb David Kirchner:
> We haven't tried Raptors yet. We're waiting for the capacities to
> approach that of the other SATA drives. As it is now the pricing on
> the Raptors isn't low enough compared to identically sized SCSI disks
> for us to use them instead.
On 11/14/05, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Du you have used SATA drives with PATA Hardware or WD Raptor WD360GD
> and WD740GD which have real SCSI-Hardware. They run with 10.000 RpM.
We haven't tried Raptors yet. We're waiting for the capacities to
approach that of the other SATA d
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 08:37 -0800, David Kirchner wrote:
> On 11/10/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue was performance, though. Are you getting good speed?
>
> I must have missed that email then, sorry about that. We use RAID5 on
I don know if it was my message, but I am hav
Am 2005-11-10 08:37:21, schrieb David Kirchner:
> On 11/10/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The issue was performance, though. Are you getting good speed?
>
> I must have missed that email then, sorry about that. We use RAID5 on
> this Linux box, RAID5 on FreeBSD (old driver) and RA
On 11/10/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue was performance, though. Are you getting good speed?
I must have missed that email then, sorry about that. We use RAID5 on
this Linux box, RAID5 on FreeBSD (old driver) and RAID1 and 10 on
FreeBSD (old and new driver). Overall our im
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 07:52 -0800, David Kirchner wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Last week on the list someone mentioned possible problems with
> > the 3ware 9xxx cards and newer kernels. Maybe it's been resolved,
> > maybe not.
>
> Yeah, someone was having troubl
On 11/9/05, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last week on the list someone mentioned possible problems with
> the 3ware 9xxx cards and newer kernels. Maybe it's been resolved,
> maybe not.
Yeah, someone was having trouble with kernel panic -- the VFS cannot
mount root one indicating that
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 11:56 -0800, David Kirchner wrote:
> On 11/9/05, enediel gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm looking for a transparent hardware RAID controller to implement a RAID1
> > for the debian,
> > ?Is it possible
TED]>:
enediel gonzalez wrote:
Hello
I'm looking for a transparent hardware RAID controller to implement a
RAID1 for the debian,
?Is it possible to find a RAID controller on the market (no matter for
IDE, SATA, SCSI hard drives) that at the moment of the debian
installation, it will see one hard d
On 11/9/05, enediel gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for a transparent hardware RAID controller to implement a RAID1
> for the debian,
> ?Is it possible to find a RAID controller on the market (no matter for IDE,
> SATA, SCSI hard drives) tha
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:40:33PM +, enediel gonzalez wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for a transparent hardware RAID controller to implement a RAID1
> for
> the debian,
> ?Is it possible to find a RAID controller on the market (no matter for IDE,
> SATA, SCS
Hello
I'm looking for a transparent hardware RAID controller to implement a RAID1
for the debian,
?Is it possible to find a RAID controller on the market (no matter for IDE,
SATA, SCSI hard drives) that at the moment of the debian installation, it
will see one hard drive on the box
Hi all,
I am in trouble with installing a Ultra DMA 133 RAID Controller from Aralion
on my PC, where a Debian 3.1sarge is installed. When I enter modprobe ataraid,
I don?t get any error messages back, but if I run fdisk /dev/rd/c0d0 afterwards,
I get: Unable to open /dev/rd/c0d0. I also tried to
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:29:11PM -0300, Tomás Corrêa wrote:
> I have the same problem with IBM xSeries 346 and scsi disks.
> Any ideias?
If you know which driver you need for the raid controller, you can
build your own kernel and put it on an installation CD.
On http://wiki.osuo
controller.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:10:16PM +0300, Meni Shapiro wrote:
>Problem with sata raid controller.
>I'm try to install debian serge (latest stable) on a u1 server with
LSI
>MegaRaid sata 150-2d controller but the intaller doesn't recognize
the
>driver
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:10:16PM +0300, Meni Shapiro wrote:
>Problem with sata raid controller.
>I'm try to install debian serge (latest stable) on a u1 server with LSI
>MegaRaid sata 150-2d controller but the intaller doesn't recognize the
>driver.
Try
Hi,
Problem with sata raid controller.
I'm try to install debian serge (latest stable) on a u1 server with LSI
MegaRaid sata 150-2d controller but the intaller doesn't recognize the
driver.
What should i do??
-- --Meni Szapiro
If anyone has installed debian (sarge, root filesystem) directly onto
disks controlled by an adaptec 2?10SA controller (eg. 2410SA, 2610SA,
2810SA, 21610SA), or knows that this has actually been done (ie. the
debian-installer recognized the card or you loaded a driver), would you
reply to this
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
