On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:44 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 2005-11-15 07:54:47, schrieb David Kirchner: > > > We haven't tried Raptors yet. We're waiting for the capacities to > > approach that of the other SATA drives. As it is now the pricing on > > the Raptors isn't low enough compared to identically sized SCSI disks > > for us to use them instead. I've definitely wanted to experiment with > > them though. > > ...and the Raptor SATA exist only in 36 GByte and 74 GByte. > > I am missing 18 GByte (emough for workststions) and 147 and > 300 GByte for Servers. > > My Woody/Sarge workstation has a 36 GByte drive and vever I had > a fast workststion like this one, ;-) OK, the price with 96 Euro > IS realy high, but I have performance pure. > > @home I have a PostgreSQL Server running with a 3Ware 3w95xxS-8 > with eight 74 GByte drives and it is around 30 times faster as > with 4 IBM/Hitachi 400 GByte on 3w8506-4LP (PATA).
Money really does == speed. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "If I started worrying about how my constituents are going to react to every move I make, I wouldn't be able to do my job here. I'll do what I think is right and explain it later." Ed Harris, Texas state legislator (D) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
