I experienced this today (Fed 1, 2018)
I had a similar problem with Debian 9.3. I started by creating a barebones VM
(all options deselected on the tasksel page). After the machine was created and
rebooted, I logged in as root and did apt-get install gnome-core. This produced
the error with rtkit daemon and dbus configure hanging as
Hi,
had similar problem with debian9. After basic installation I installed
serveral services und system haltet while running apt-get install.
We're running debian as virtual machines on ESX 6.5.
So, I've figured out, when you install a brand new Server together with
ESX6.5 mode and vmxnet3 n
Finally I have managed to install the driver and it works perfectly now
after installing the binutils and kernel sources. I just wonder why they
were not installed by default as they are essential
Thank you Ölafur for the hint
Ibrahim
2009/4/22 Ibrahim Shaame
> No, it's not there. Will try to
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:24:31AM +0200, Ibrahim Shaame wrote:
> I have two problems in installing Debian Leny:
>
> 2 - I have just acquired ASUS with AMD Phenom Quad and NVIDIA GForce. I have
> installed Slamd64 ( a Slackware variant for AMD 64bit). It booted after the
> first shot and X used fr
I have two problems in installing Debian Leny:
1 - I installed a 32 bit version on and AMD, which installed correctly. I
have other installations (Slackware 12.2 and Slackware 12.0, DLS, etc) on
the machine. At the Grub menu, when I select Slackware 12.0 it boots with a
minor error message. But Sl
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
How can I know if I'm running 64 bit Debian?
Javier Barroso wrote:
just run "uname -r"
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes:
This will return the architecture of the kernel, but it is possible to
run a 64-bit kernel w
On 01/29/2009 12:23 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
[snip]
$ uname -r
2.6.18-4-k7
$ dpkg-architecture
DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS=linux
DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU=i386
DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i486
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux-gnu
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i486-linux-gnu
DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386
DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS=linux
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> $ uname -r
> 2.6.18-4-k7
>
That's a k7 kernel (optimized for Athlons). 32-bit.
> $ dpkg-architecture
> DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386
>
And a matching architecture.
> So, am I running 64 bit Debian?
>
Definitely not.
--
Let the machine do the dirty work.
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> >>> How can I know if I'm running 64 bit Debian?
Javier Barroso wrote:
>> just run "uname -r"
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes:
> This will return the architecture of the kernel, but it is possible to
> run a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland.
>
> dpkg-architecture wi
Javier Barroso wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> How can I know if I'm running 64 bit Debian?
>
> just run "uname -r"
This will return the architecture of the kernel, but it is possible to
run a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland.
dpkg-architecture will list the architecture that dpkg expects.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook writes:
>
> >>> Openoffice offers a package for Debian that contains all the
> >>> necessary debs. You can get it by making your choice here:
> >>>
> >>> http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#en-US
> >>>
> >>> I've
Peter Hillier-Brook writes:
>>> Openoffice offers a package for Debian that contains all the
>>> necessary debs. You can get it by making your choice here:
>>>
>>> http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#en-US
>>>
>>> I've installed Openoffice3 using this package (after uninstalling
>>> the def
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
On Jan 27, 11:30 am, Angus Auld wrote:
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
From: Rodolfo Medina Subject: Problems
with installation of OpenOffice 3.0 To:
debian-u...@lists.debian.org Date: Monday, January 26, 2009,
11:20 PM
From openoffice web site I
On Jan 27, 11:30 am, Angus Auld wrote:
> --- On Mon, 1/26/09, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Rodolfo Medina
> > Subject: Problems with installation of OpenOffice 3.0
> > To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
> > Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 11:2
On 01/27/2009 05:14 AM, Angus Auld wrote:
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
From: Rodolfo Medina
Subject: Problems with installation of OpenOffice 3.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 11:20 PM
>From openoffice web site I downloaded the tarb
--- On Mon, 1/26/09, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> From: Rodolfo Medina
> Subject: Problems with installation of OpenOffice 3.0
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Monday, January 26, 2009, 11:20 PM
> >From openoffice web site I downloaded the tarball
> OOo_3.0.0_Linux
On 01/26/2009 05:20 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
From openoffice web site I downloaded the tarball
OOo_3.0.0_LinuxIntel_install_wJRE_en-US.tar.gz and installed it in my Debian
system. But then, when I start openoffice, it fails with the following error
message:
$ openoffice.org3
/opt/openoffice.o
>From openoffice web site I downloaded the tarball
OOo_3.0.0_LinuxIntel_install_wJRE_en-US.tar.gz and installed it in my Debian
system. But then, when I start openoffice, it fails with the following error
message:
$ openoffice.org3
/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice: line 124:
/opt/openoffice.
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 01:38:47 +0100
Alex Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a Toshiba Satellite M70-165 that I bought some days ago. This machine
> came with WinXP and some Toshiba software. Then, I decided to download the
> lastest ISO stable Debian for i386, and burned it.
Hello,
I have a Toshiba Satellite M70-165 that I bought some days ago. This machine
came with WinXP and some Toshiba software. Then, I decided to download the
lastest ISO stable Debian for i386, and burned it. My pretension was to
divide my hard drive of 80Gb taking 15Gb for Win and the other
Hi. Please in the future use more informative subject lines. There's
too much traffic in this mailing list for everyone to read *everything*;
so people rely on informative subject lines to decide what to read and
what not. Without one, people are likely to just skip your email.
See http://catb
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:28:22AM +0200, Oleg Kaplun wrote:
> Hello,
> I've just bought new ASUS "A8N-VM CSM" motherboard with CPU: AMD 64
> 3200+.
> Motherborad hase integrated LAN (Gbit MACwith Marvell 88E
> external PHY), VGA (intergated GeForce6150 + nForce 430), SATA II
> interfas
Hello,
I've just bought new ASUS "A8N-VM CSM" motherboard with CPU: AMD 64
3200+.
Motherborad hase integrated LAN (Gbit MACwith Marvell 88E
external PHY), VGA (intergated GeForce6150 + nForce 430), SATA II
interfase, etc.
Problems are:
1. LAN can not be detected.
2. HDD (Sata 2
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:40:24PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Patrick Klee wrote:
>
> >> I'm not sure what problem you're describing.
> >>
> >> If your machine will boot off the CD, don't worry about floppies (except
> >> to make a boot floppy near the end of the install for emergency
> >> purpose
Patrick Klee wrote:
I'm not sure what problem you're describing.
If your machine will boot off the CD, don't worry about floppies (except
to make a boot floppy near the end of the install for emergency
purposes). If your machine won't boot off the CD, you have to create
some boot/root floppies
Patrick Klee wrote:
Hi,
I have been a Redhat user since 4.2. I now have SuSE 6.4 but don't like
it. I have the Debian 2.2r0 CDs that were burnt by a friend but I can't
install the OS and kernel, or the base system, also, it has trouble finding
the directories and mounting the floppy.
Here'
Patrick,
Wish you would have included a tid-bit of info on your system. Anyway, if
you can boot off the CDROM drive (look in your bios settings), then do it.
If it boots, then this isn't an issue at all.
The debian installer isn't like what you have played with in the past. It
will ask real
Hi,
I have been a Redhat user since 4.2. I now have SuSE 6.4 but don't like
it. I have the Debian 2.2r0 CDs that were burnt by a friend but I can't
install the OS and kernel, or the base system, also, it has trouble finding
the directories and mounting the floppy.
Here's the situation: I have
On 16 Aug 1997, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
> "Daniel J. Mashao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I ran dpkg on gnuplot and everything seems to go on smoothly but
> > unfortunately it does not run. It says it cannot load a library
> > 'libvga.so.1'. I have searched for a library with this name but I
"Daniel J. Mashao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ran dpkg on gnuplot and everything seems to go on smoothly but
> unfortunately it does not run. It says it cannot load a library
> 'libvga.so.1'. I have searched for a library with this name but I
> did not find any.
You need to install the svgal
I ran dpkg on gnuplot and everything seems to go on smoothly but
unfortunately it does not run. It says it cannot load a library
'libvga.so.1'. I have searched for a library with this name but I did not
find any.
Any help is appreciated.
Second does any one know what command-line program I can u
> > BTW: When will 1.1 be released?
>
> I am uploading yet another pass at the installation floppies today.
> We're also dealing with some FTP site problems. I'm going to make a new
> "stable" archive this week, and will let that propogate out to all of
> the FTP mirrors. We then will give it a fe
Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
> My 0.93R6 system at home is the most stable linux system I have ever seen.
> Now that 1.1 is nearly ready for release, I agree that it is approaching
> the same level of stability. It is true that 0.93 probably is not
> compatible with some of the newer hardware and sof
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when
> I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6,
> which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as when I mirrored
> unstable 1.1.
My 0.
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
> this for a while before I do it, though.
Lets be kind to our mirrors.. :)
We also need to move the 1.1 into place when this happens.
Then we need to create the next gener
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
> this for a while before I do it, though.
I vote for not deleting it but for renaming to obsolete or old.
We should not remove the last stable version before 1.1 is released and
pr
Yes, it's time for us to remove 0.93 from the FTP site. I'll think about
this for a while before I do it, though.
Bruce
--
Pixar's Toy Story: Over 1/3 Billion dollars world box office so far.
Bruce Perens AB6YM [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.hams.com/
Martin Konold wrote:
> > Why don't you try installing Debian 1.1 beta instead of 0.93R6? It's
> > located in the unstable directory of your friendly Debian mirror site.
> > but don't be misled by the 'unstable' name... 1.1 is now in late beta and
> > is quite stable now. And the installation proces
> > I do agree. You really should go for 1.1 beta. This version is supposed
>
> Then maybe the warning signs in the ftp sites should be updated? Back when
> I went for Debian I saw lots of them lying around (and so I went to 0.93R6,
> which indeed prooved less stable than "unstable"), as well as
> BTW: When will 1.1 be released?
I am uploading yet another pass at the installation floppies today.
We're also dealing with some FTP site problems. I'm going to make a new
"stable" archive this week, and will let that propogate out to all of
the FTP mirrors. We then will give it a few more days
> > Hello,
> > I have an old AMD' 80386 40MHz with 4MB of RAM and I really like
> > to install Linux on it. I spent some time looking around and
> > then I decided to proceed with the Debian distribution.
> > Got the five disks of the 0.93R6 version I started the installation
> > but with no su
On Fri, 31 May 1996, Alberto Brizio wrote:
> Hello,
> I have an old AMD' 80386 40MHz with 4MB of RAM and I really like
> to install Linux on it. I spent some time looking around and
> then I decided to proceed with the Debian distribution.
> Got the five disks of the 0.93R6 version I started the
Hello,
I have an old AMD' 80386 40MHz with 4MB of RAM and I really like
to install Linux on it. I spent some time looking around and
then I decided to proceed with the Debian distribution.
Got the five disks of the 0.93R6 version I started the installation
but with no success at all.
I disabled
44 matches
Mail list logo
