> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of
> problems with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape
> instead I had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could
> be so, or would they look like as in Mozilla?
It is a partial solution.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:43:41PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> No, in Netscape 4.xx a webpage might look different than in Mozilla, but
> in Netscape 6 and Netscape 7, it would look just like Mozilla shows it.
To clarify my prior post, I don't consi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Sara Gil Casanova wrote:
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
> with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
> had a chance to see them
Sara Gil Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
> with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
> had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could be so, or
> would they l
On Friday 30 May 2003 22:08, Sara Gil Casanova wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of
> problems with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using
> Netscape instead I had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you
> think it could be so, or
Hi!
I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could be so, or
would they look like as in Mozilla?
In case the answer to the
6 matches
Mail list logo
