-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Sara Gil Casanova wrote: > I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems > with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I > had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could be so, or > would they look like as in Mozilla?
Both Mozilla and Konqueror are lightyears ahead of Netscape. If it doesn't render in either of those, then the site likely just plain sucks in any browser and you should email the webmaster requesting that they fix the page and run it through http://validator.w3.org/ and tweak until it complies with the published standards. If you code to the standard, your page will render in any web browser worthy of the title (most browsers out there) and look almost, if not exactly, identical in all browsers capable of rendering it. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+2GSEJ5vLSqVpK2kRAv0VAJ4m5NXgiwnIIjYRCC0feck2wKXr2ACdEMkf A6vOkO1gnGjEu+jWWAEiNPc= =8PPg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
