> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of
> problems with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape
> instead I had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could
> be so, or would they look like as in Mozilla?
It is a partial solution.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:43:41PM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> No, in Netscape 4.xx a webpage might look different than in Mozilla, but
> in Netscape 6 and Netscape 7, it would look just like Mozilla shows it.
To clarify my prior post, I don't consi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:08:50PM +0200, Sara Gil Casanova wrote:
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
> with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
> had a chance to see them
Sara Gil Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
> with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
> had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could be so, or
> would they l
On Friday 30 May 2003 22:08, Sara Gil Casanova wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of
> problems with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using
> Netscape instead I had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you
> think it could be so, or
Hi!
I usually use Konqueror or Mozilla, but today I was having a lot of problems
with no W3C-compliant web sites, and I wondered if using Netscape instead I
had a chance to see them a little "better". Do you think it could be so, or
would they look like as in Mozilla?
In case the answer to the
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Jun 2000, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> > Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Just one more little question, since I'm new to Debian. How can I notice
> > > which packages are virtual and which other are not?
> >
> > Hmm. There are very few "virt
On 29 Jun 2000, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just one more little question, since I'm new to Debian. How can I notice
> > which packages are virtual and which other are not?
>
> Hmm. There are very few "virtual" packages. That's the only one I've
Everything
Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That did it! Thanks a lot, Gary!
>
> Just one more little question, since I'm new to Debian. How can I notice
> which packages are virtual and which other are not?
Hmm. There are very few "virtual" packages. That's the only one I've
ever run across, and
On 29 Jun 2000, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just installed Debian for the first time. It is Debian 2.1 slink. When
> > I try to install Netscape via apt-get I get the following error message:
> >
> > Setting up netscape4 (4.0-15) ...
> >
> > ERROR: The Ne
Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed Debian for the first time. It is Debian 2.1 slink. When
> I try to install Netscape via apt-get I get the following error message:
>
> Setting up netscape4 (4.0-15) ...
>
> ERROR: The Netscape archive must be in /tmp, owned by root,
>
I just installed Debian for the first time. It is Debian 2.1 slink. When
I try to install Netscape via apt-get I get the following error message:
Setting up netscape4 (4.0-15) ...
ERROR: The Netscape archive must be in /tmp, owned by root,
and under a name matching one of the following:
12 matches
Mail list logo
