Marcus Brinkmann typed:
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > Lars Hallberg writes:
> > > I think smail refuses to rewrite the from: field.
> >
> > Putting
> >
> > from_field="From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($fullname)"
> >
> > in /etc/smail/c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Lars Hallberg writes:
> > I think smail refuses to rewrite the from: field.
>
> Putting
>
> from_field="From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($fullname)"
>
> in /etc/smail/config works for me.
With some versions of smail, you cannot do any substitution. I suspect you
have a
On Mar 20, Hamish Moffatt wrote
> > It is. Due to unclarity wrt ITAR for packages with hooks for crypto,
> > such as mutt, the Debian mutt packages resides on debian-non-US sites
> > nowadays. I've reported a bug against ftp.debian.org to get the old
> > package removed.
>
> Which is odd, because
On Mar 03, 1997 at 01:52:34PM +0100, J.H.M.Dassen wrote:
> On Mar 19, Alexander Koch wrote
> > So you may see what Mutt is like. But you should be careful. I'd say:
> > stick with the Debian- MUTT- Package and you're fine. It's not as news as
> > the real MUTT but it _works_ (believe me, it's a bi
On Mar 19, Alexander Koch wrote
> So you may see what Mutt is like. But you should be careful. I'd say:
> stick with the Debian- MUTT- Package and you're fine. It's not as news as
> the real MUTT but it _works_ (believe me, it's a bit tricky to make it
It is. Due to unclarity wrt ITAR for package
On Mar 19, Marcus Brinkmann wrote
: Hello!
:
: I have the same line in my /etc/smail/config, but I feel *VERY* sick about
: it, because *EVERY* mail gets this From: field. No! The From: field must be
: user dependent, or there is something wrong. But after spending too much
: time about too much d
Hello!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Lars Hallberg writes:
> > I think smail refuses to rewrite the from: field.
>
> Putting
>
> from_field="From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($fullname)"
>
> in /etc/smail/config works for me.
I have the same line in my /etc/smail/config, but I feel *VERY* sick
Lars Hallberg writes:
> I think smail refuses to rewrite the from: field.
Putting
from_field="From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($fullname)"
in /etc/smail/config works for me.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with it what you will.
Danci
"Jonathan A. Buzzard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now connected via modem. It delivers mail fine *except* the "From:" field=
> =2E
>
> Instead of reading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I get <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Having read
Just a thought, but what's your machine's entry in hosts? I have a
similar conf
I think smail refuses to rewrite the from: field. So, if Your mail app is
adding a from: field smail will leave it unchanged. You have to make your
mail app add the right from: field (or non att all) to fix it. If You find
any other solution, please tell me
HTH /Lars
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
After using Debian 0.93R6 for some 18 months, I took the opportunity of
installing a bigger hard disk in my laptop to install 1.2 from the cover
CD of Linux World. There where a few problems on the install, but most of
the ones I found seem to have been fixed, and everything is running
smoot
I'm running Debian Linux 1.2 with smail 3.2-3, and recently installed
the current Mutt mailer package (0.52) to test it out. (Mutt is a mail
program similar to Elm but with many new features.)
Problem is, out of the box they don't deliver mail properly to
local users. With Mutt, if I send email
12 matches
Mail list logo
