On Mar 19, Alexander Koch wrote > So you may see what Mutt is like. But you should be careful. I'd say: > stick with the Debian- MUTT- Package and you're fine. It's not as news as > the real MUTT but it _works_ (believe me, it's a bit tricky to make it
It is. Due to unclarity wrt ITAR for packages with hooks for crypto, such as mutt, the Debian mutt packages resides on debian-non-US sites nowadays. I've reported a bug against ftp.debian.org to get the old package removed. > work sometimes). Basically, the Debian mutt package is simply the latest non-developer release (i.e. one announced on mutt-announce), with all bugfix patches that apply cleanly, and a matching Muttrc. > Otherwise if you install it by hand and want to use it, you are better off > following the mutt-users mailing list, there're still too much bugfixes and > expermintal patches flying around. Remember: MUTT is still alpha software! > Well, besides the point ELM 2.5 beta is _without_ PGP support at all > there's only one choice for me. And please don't mention PINE, thanks. ,-) The Debian elm-me+ package has PGP support. Greetings, Ray -- Tevens ben ik van mening dat Nederland overdekt dient te worden.
