Re: Email Problem [Solved]

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:03:39 -0500 "Stephen P. Molnar" wrote: Hello Stephen, >Solved the problem! I accepted the Certificate and the popup went away >and didn't reappear. Good news. Thx for letting us know. -- Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}" / )

Re: Bookworm: IBM DSD3300 iSCSI connection problem [solved]

On 6/17/24 11:04, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 3:41 PM Greg > wrote: Hi there, I'm trying to mount iscsi share exported from old IBM DS3300. Unfortunately I get the following error: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout 5,

Re: Ethernet Performance Problem Solved

On 9/6/2022 5:00 PM, Marc Auslander wrote: I have an Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101/2/6E PCI Express Fast/Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Acer Incorporated [ALI] RTL810xE PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller There is also a Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device 8161 (

Re: disk mount problem [solved]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 --- Original Message --- On Thursday, June 9th, 2022 at 1:38 PM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > > You have a typo in options. Should be: > > UUID=21dcbfda-3884-404f-855f-693d1efa2f06 /blackHole ext4 > defaults 0 0 Alexander is righ

Re: non-existing interface problem [SOLVED, kinda]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I don't know what to say. I rebooted the box, yet again, last evening. This morning, I tried yesterday's last suggestion (a big grep of dmesg), and there was no mention of wwan0 or eth1. I ran the others too (dmesg (with several greps), ifconfi

Re: SanDisk USB stick problem [solved]

On Mi, 09 dec 20, 19:47:14, Joe wrote: > > I believe a mount point will always be owned by root, regardless of the > permissions of the underlying directory, Nitpick: in the relevant documentation a "mount point" is the underlying directory. You're probably referring to the filesystem's root d

Re: SanDisk USB stick problem [solved]

On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 07:47:14PM +, Joe wrote: > I believe a mount point will always be owned by root, regardless of the > permissions of the underlying directory, because only root is allowed > to mount things. unicorn:~$ mkdir mtpt unicorn:~$ ls -ld mtpt drwxr-xr-x 2 greg greg 4096 Dec 9

Re: SanDisk USB stick problem [solved]

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:22:28 -0700 Fred wrote: > When I was denied permission to write a file to the device as a > regular user I checked the permissions and then discovered root could > not change them. Being a hardware oriented person I was concerned > the SecureAccess software needed to chang

Re: SanDisk USB stick problem [solved]

On 12/8/20 9:39 PM, David Christensen wrote: On 2020-12-08 07:29, Fred wrote: Hello, I bought a SanDisk Cruzer Glide USB stick.  The fine print on the package says it has SecureAccess software.  It is so secure it prevents me from writing to it without running the included Bill Gates cancero

Re: XFCE session problem SOLVED

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:17:10 +0100 Liam O'Toole wrote: > It sounds like the process /usr/bin/xfdesktop is either crashing or > not being started at all. Try running it from a terminal emulator and > see what happens. Odd. charles@jhegaala:~$ ps aux | grep -i xfdesktop charles 6967 0.0 0.0

Re: web problem [solved]

On 2/17/19 12:45 PM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > By default "traceroute" command uses 0ms delay between requests. For the > majority of ISPs this behavior is considered as flood and will be > rate-limited (dropped). > You have to use "sendwait" parameter set to at least 1 (second), to > gather

Re: Printing problem SOLVED

Hi, It was a problem with rights. I do not know how they were changed. I could print as root, not as user. Printing with qpdfview as root worked. Firefox, Geany, Gimp I started as user, and I could not print with those. The solution for my printer with brother_lpdwrapper_HLL2340D was: /usr/lib/c

Re: Exim4 problem? solved- just for completeness.....

On 14/04/2017, deloptes wrote: > Charlie wrote: > >> /var/log/exim4/paniclog has non-zero size, mail system possibly broken > > This is common for exim . > 1. check the paniclog > 2. take actions if needed based on 1. > 3. remove paniclog > 4. proceed with restart > > it has nothing to do with sys

Re: Wan/Lan problem [SOLVED]

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:40:29PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On March 30, 2017 8:27:54 PM EDT, Mike McClain > wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:25:52AM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > >> On March 28, 2017 7:46:02 PM EDT, Mike McClain > > wrote: > > > >If I'm understanding you you're sa

Re: Cepstral swift and Debian stretch: problem solved.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:47:15PM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: > My thanks for all the help and suggestions, and my apologies for all > the floundering. Cepstral support spotted the problem pretty quickly. > > Evidently somehow I managed to install

Cepstral swift and Debian stretch: problem solved.

My thanks for all the help and suggestions, and my apologies for all the floundering. Cepstral support spotted the problem pretty quickly. Evidently somehow I managed to install a 32 bit Debian on this 64 bit PC, but I was attempting to install a 64 bit package on it. Downloading and installing th

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Wednesday, 12/14/16 11:06:52 AM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 December 2016 19:23:49 Mark Neidorff wrote: > > On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Tuesday 13 December 2016 19:23:49 Mark Neidorff wrote: > On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a user account full > > > administrative access acceptable, ev

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Tuesday, 12/13/16 02:34:00 PM Henning Follmann wrote: > > Good news! I solved the problem. This solution came from the openSUSE > > forums... (just giving credit where credit is due) > > > > As root, in the folder /etc/cron.* (where * is either daily, hourly, etc. > > depending on how often y

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

> > > Good news! I solved the problem. This solution came from the openSUSE > forums... (just giving credit where credit is due) > > As root, in the folder /etc/cron.* (where * is either daily, hourly, etc. > depending on how often you want the check to take place): > > 1. Create a file cal

Re: Package update problem...{***SOLVED***}

On Monday, 12/12/16 11:49:01 PM kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mark Neidorff wrote: > > Sorry to seem stubborn, but I don't consider giving a user account full > > administrative access acceptable, even if there is only one user on the > > system. My reasoning is th

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 19:07:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 15 September 2016 13:38:49 Brian wrote: > > On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 11:01:12 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > Are you deliberately remaining uncontactable off list? You must be > > > sending > > > > I am not uncontactable. > > > >

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Thursday 15 September 2016 13:38:49 Brian wrote: > On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 11:01:12 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Are you deliberately remaining uncontactable off list? You must be > > sending > > I am not uncontactable. > > > from one email address and receiving to another, since the email addres

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 11:01:12 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > Are you deliberately remaining uncontactable off list? You must be sending I am not uncontactable. > from one email address and receiving to another, since the email address > still doesn't work, and you are getting list emails. The

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Thursday 15 September 2016 00:50:25 Brian wrote: > On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 00:33:09 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 September 2016 23:09:12 Brian wrote: > > > >        Ah. That's good.  Your E-mail reader seems to respect my > > > > indentations.  Others don't, alas.  Do you perchance

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Brian" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 5:09:12 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved > What is "unenlightening" to you may not be unenlightening to others; >

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Thu 15 Sep 2016 at 00:33:09 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 14 September 2016 23:09:12 Brian wrote: > > >        Ah. That's good.  Your E-mail reader seems to respect my > > > indentations.  Others don't, alas.  Do you perchance use mutt? > > Indentations count as formatting. Plain te

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 23:09:12 Brian wrote: > >        Ah. That's good.  Your E-mail reader seems to respect my > > indentations.  Others don't, alas.  Do you perchance use mutt? Indentations count as formatting. Plain text is supposed not to preserve formatting. Lisi

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wed 14 Sep 2016 at 17:11:26 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: Alan McConnell's responses are indented and begin with >. > From: "Brian" Brian's resonses are not indented. > > > Yep. I have been back to my Jessie in the meantime, and run > > os-prober. > > I didn't attempt to

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Brian" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:51:50 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Wed 14 Sep 2016 at 11:34:31 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > From: "Felix Miata&q

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Lisi Reisz" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:05:47 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Wednesday 14 September 2016 19:51:50 Brian wrote: > You are probably asking the w

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 19:51:50 Brian wrote: > You are probably asking the wrong question. Oh, no, Brian. He is asking the right question by definition. Alan is asking it, it is therefore right. We are providing the wrong answers. And to make matters worse we are doing so in Old Engl

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wed 14 Sep 2016 at 11:34:31 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > From: "Felix Miata" > > It does seem curious that the Debian installer would need knowledge of a > particular Windows version in order to provide a boot menu selection for it, > rather than simply having one that says "Windows", boo

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 16:34:31 Alan McConnell wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Felix Miata" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:44:14 AM > Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved &g

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Felix Miata" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:44:14 AM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-13 20:50 (UTC-0400): > when my home Debian in

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wed 14 Sep 2016 at 02:44:14 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-13 20:50 (UTC-0400): > ... > >But maybe someone > >can tell me why the installer can't look at the partitions and determine > >that there > >is some kind of OS already installed? Why does it have to kno

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 01:50:44 Alan McConnell wrote: >Re Royal Holloway: boys were added in 1966, a year before my time > there. But there were always male faculty there, especially in math, which > subject has, most unfortunately, suffered from a dearth of qualified women. > Th

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Wednesday 14 September 2016 01:50:44 Alan McConnell wrote: > More perhaps tomorrow.  I have tasks to perform before bed.  But maybe > someone can tell me why the installer can't look at the partitions and > determine that there is some kind of OS already installed?  Why does it > have to know ab

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-13 20:50 (UTC-0400): Lisi Reisz composed: Gene Heskett wrote: Now I am going to push back Alan. If you are going to come in here and berate folks about this and that, the first thing you need to do is to train your email agent (wth is "X-Mailer: Zim

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Lisi Reisz" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 3:58:01 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Tuesday 13 September 2016 18:24:07 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 13 September

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tue 13 Sep 2016 at 21:02:01 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Tuesday 13 September 2016 20:30:20 Brian wrote: > > > A final question:  I've used Wiktionary to learn that 'whinging' is the > > > English for what we Murricans call 'whining'.  Is it used a lot nowadays? > > >  I don't recall ever hav

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tuesday 13 September 2016 18:24:07 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 13 September 2016 08:57:19 Alan McConnell wrote: > > Warning: This E-mail is for the most part in the nature of a pushback > > against various insinuations that have been made. > > Now I am going to push back Alan. > > If you a

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tuesday 13 September 2016 20:30:20 Brian wrote: > > A final question:  I've used Wiktionary to learn that 'whinging' is the > > English for what we Murricans call 'whining'.  Is it used a lot nowadays? > >  I don't recall ever having heard it when I taught at Royal Holloway > > College back in 1

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Mon 12 Sep 2016 at 14:14:53 (-0400), Alan McConnell wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Felix Miata" > Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:14:26 PM > Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved > > David Wright composed o

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tue 13 Sep 2016 at 13:01:58 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > You were asked for some information. You declined to provide it. As a > route to solving a technical problem your response leaves a lot to be > desired. > Did you read why I declined? I repeat my reason for your benefit: I im

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 23:14:26 (-0400), Felix Miata wrote: > David Wright composed on 2016-09-11 21:44 (UTC-0500): > ... > >>Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved > ... > How is it beneficial to list anyone here or searching list archives >

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tuesday 13 September 2016 08:57:19 Alan McConnell wrote: > Warning: This E-mail is for the most part in the nature of a pushback > against various insinuations that have been made. > Now I am going to push back Alan. If you are going to come in here and berate folks about this and that, the

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tuesday 13 September 2016 18:01:58 Alan McConnell wrote: > > Finally:  I have taken a resolution not to respond to further > > chastisement or smarm. Please help me to keep it! What a pity you didn't! What happened to your self control?? Lisi

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Brian" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 9:40:11 AM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Tue 13 Sep 2016 at 08:57:19 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Warning: This E-mail is

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Tue 13 Sep 2016 at 08:57:19 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Warning: This E-mail is for the most part in the nature of a pushback against > various insinuations that have been made. Warning duly noted; most of this mail is snipped so we can concentrate on the technical aspects of your issue.

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

un at boot time -- Problem solved On Monday 12 September 2016 19:14:53 Alan McConnell wrote: > Maybe I should apologize for "hijacking a thread"? Yes, you should. It has left the person whose thread you have hijacked high and dry. It is most definitely "not done" to hijack t

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Monday 12 September 2016 19:14:53 Alan McConnell wrote: > Maybe I should apologize for "hijacking a thread"? Yes, you should. It has left the person whose thread you have hijacked high and dry. It is most definitely "not done" to hijack threads. By those who care about etiquette and other

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Mon 12 Sep 2016 at 14:14:53 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > From: "Felix Miata" > ... > How is it beneficial to list anyone here or searching list archives to > continue a thread by chastising an OP for being imperfect more than 12 hours > after OP added string "solved" to the subject and tha

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Felix Miata" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 10:14:26 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved David Wright composed on 2016-09-11 21:44 (UTC-0500): ... >> Subject: Re: How to g

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sunday 11 September 2016 20:51:50 Brian wrote: > On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 15:17:00 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > > On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 11:13:45 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > > > Addendum: during my Jessie install, the install program commented at > > > one point: "There doesn't seem to be any

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 23:14:26 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > David Wright composed on 2016-09-11 21:44 (UTC-0500): > ... > >>Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved > ... > How is it beneficial to list anyone here or searching list archives to &

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

David Wright composed on 2016-09-11 21:44 (UTC-0500): ... Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved ... How is it beneficial to list anyone here or searching list archives to continue a thread by chastising an OP for being imperfect more than 12 hours after OP added

Re: Fwd: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 18:49:47 (-0400), Alan McConnell wrote: > From: "Brian" > Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 2:51:50 PM > Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved > > On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 15:17:00 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > > &

Re: Fwd: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 06:49:47PM -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Deconstruction of this statement follows: > Brian, you are in a bad temper. Did you read the amended title of > this > and previous messages? "Problem solved". > > Suggestion:

Fwd: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved This only to you, Brian. - Original Message - From: "Brian" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 2:51:50 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 15:17:00 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 11:13:45 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > > > Addendum: during my Jessie install, the install program commented at one > > point: > > "There doesn't seem to be any other OS on your system". Jeez!! I hope some >

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Brian" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 1:32:54 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 11:13:45 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Addendum: during my Jessie

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

On Sun 11 Sep 2016 at 11:13:45 -0400, Alan McConnell wrote: > Addendum: during my Jessie install, the install program commented at one > point: > "There doesn't seem to be any other OS on your system". Jeez!! I hope some > maintainer reads this complaint and Debian works hard to make sure tha

Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time -- Problem solved

- Original Message - From: "Felix Miata" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:33:46 PM Subject: Re: How to get Jessie to run at boot time Alan McConnell composed on 2016-09-10 17:45 (UTC-0400): > Good grief. I just wrote that I am now logged in to a w

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

[Please don't top post] On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:09:02PM +, John L. Ries wrote: > I guess my first question would be why the script below has anything to do > with /opt. I don't see a change of directory to anything under that > directory and I would assume this is running in some directory

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: [...] > > What I'd do > > > > Consider making a subdirectory of /opt dedicated to whatever you > > are doing with these scripts and setting its ownership to gene > > (start as restricted as possible with that and widen as necessary, > > e.g. to

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thu, 19 May 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote: Doesn't being old _suck_? Word dat. -- Man is essentially a dreamer, wakened sometimes for a moment by some peculiarly obtrusive element in the outer world, but lapsing again quickly into the happy somnolence of imagination.

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:24:38 Dan Purgert wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> [snip] > >> Will reply to Gene off-list as well in order to send a screenshot. > >> But no, it is still not working. Tried in Chromium and Firefox. > >> > >> Lisi

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote: >> [snip] >> Will reply to Gene off-list as well in order to send a screenshot. >> But no, it is still not working. Tried in Chromium and Firefox. >> >> Lisi > > For those following along, I had apache2 listening on port 630

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:30:21 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly. > A 2500mg. I have a 250mg in my daily pilltainer, but overdid it a bit yesterday, so that wasn't enough. The Metformin we take for the

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > Yes, its the link in the sig. > > > > > > Which has been unreachable a

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly. Didn't know that one! (B12) Doesn't being old _suck_? Lisi

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Yes, its the link in the sig. > > > > Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by > > BST=UTC+1) > > > > Lis

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Yes, its the link in the sig. > > Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by > BST=UTC+1) > > Lisi Thats Lisi, I'll check that out when I wake up again. Bad night,

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote: > Yes, its the link in the sig. Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by BST=UTC+1) Lisi

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Thursday 19 May 2016 04:14:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:45:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > I feel I've been warned off commenting here in case I come across as > > a pontificating know-it-all who's insisting that you do everything > > in "My Way" [...] > > ;-) > >

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:45:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > I feel I've been warned off commenting here in case I come across as a > pontificating know-it-all who's insisting that you do everything in > "My Way" [...] ;-) Yes, I totally agree wit

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

I feel I've been warned off commenting here in case I come across as a pontificating know-it-all who's insisting that you do everything in "My Way". Well, if there are any opinions here about how things *should* be done, they're nothing to do with me, but just taken from the FHS (2015-03-19). It us

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

an.org<mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one This seems to me that it may be a bug in the version of bash that is running on the system, but I could be very wrong. To address that: gene@coyote:/$ ls -l `locate bin/bash` -rwxr-xr-x 1 ro

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

9)543-8880 x107 > or (435)867-8885 > > From: Logan Erbst > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:34 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one > > This seems to me that it may be a bug in th

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

On Wednesday 18 May 2016 17:42:59 Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > I am, because my web page serves as a backup site for the os and some > tools for use with the now 30 year old trs-80 color computers, have a > script IP can run that pulls fresh copies of the sources for this code > using

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one This seems to me that it may be a bug in the version of bash that is running on the system, but I could be very wrong. On 5/18/2016 4:42 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings all; I am, because my web p

Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one

This seems to me that it may be a bug in the version of bash that is running on the system, but I could be very wrong. On 5/18/2016 4:42 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > I am, because my web page serves as a backup site for the os and some > tools for use with the now 30 year old trs-

Got that network problem solved, now a new one

Greetings all; I am, because my web page serves as a backup site for the os and some tools for use with the now 30 year old trs-80 color computers, have a script IP can run that pulls fresh copies of the sources for this code using hg, then builds fresh copies and makes it all available on my w

RE: Repository Problem - SOLVED

From: Stephen P. Molnar [mailto:s.mol...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 6:37 AM To: 'Michael Milliman'; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Repository Problem From: Michael Milliman [mailto:michael.e.milli...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 11:27 PM To

Re: (should be) simple bind problem [solved]

On May 26, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Glenn English wrote: > apparmor. No permission probs in the log this morning. Thanks much to those with suggestions. -- Glenn English -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..

Re: mpd/systemd problem SOLVED

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 02:44:21AM +0100, sp113438 wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:08:03 +0200 > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Ma, 16 dec 14, 17:57:56, sp113438 wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have a problem with updating mpd and/or systemd. > > > > > > > > > Preparing to unpack .../m/mpd/m

Re: mpd/systemd problem SOLVED II half

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 03:06:55 +0100 sp113438 wrote: > On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:44:21 +0100 > > Sorry, > > The problem is solved by renaming /usr/bin/mpd , restart the > computer and then update. > > (I found no other way of stopping mpd) > > Thanks! > This part remains unsolved: systemd can n

Re: mpd/systemd problem SOLVED II

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 02:44:21 +0100 Sorry, The problem is solved by renaming /usr/bin/mpd , restart the computer and then update. (I found no other way of stopping mpd) Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: mpd/systemd problem SOLVED

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:08:03 +0200 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 16 dec 14, 17:57:56, sp113438 wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a problem with updating mpd and/or systemd. > > > > > > Preparing to unpack .../m/mpd/mpd_0.19.1-1.1_amd64.deb ... > > Job for mpd.service canceled. > > invoke-rc.d:

wifi password problem solved, or at least, worked around.

On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 21:28:35 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > Near the beginning of September, I reported suddenly being unable to > connect to wifi in coffee shops. Around the same time, I has done a > routine upgrade to my jessie system; I do this every week or two. > > Everything had been working

Re: Package Install Problem (Solved)

Thank you for the advice Robin, it worked like a champ! Mike On 2/15/2014 6:57 AM, Robin wrote: On 15 February 2014 13:41, Mike wrote: I am trying to install a .deb package from the local hard drive using dpkg -i .deb. It appears to read the package and then gives me a list of dependencies th

Re: Wheezy/Xfce Gnome keyring problem [Solved]

On 20131231_221413, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:11:26 -0700 > Paul E Condon wrote: > > > > Ok, now it is starting to get interesting. gnome-keyring by itself is a > > > process which should store user credentials. gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so is > > > a library that (judging by name

Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]

Le 26.10.2013 11:02, François Patte a écrit : Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: Bonsoir, trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1

Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]

Hi. On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:02:38 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : > >> Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from > >> .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... > >> dpkg: error processing > >> /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3

Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]

Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : > On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: >> Bonsoir, >> >> trying to overwrite >> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in >> package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^^ >> Unpackin

Re: icedove configuration problem [SOLVED]

On 2013-08-12, François Patte wrote: > > To fool this behaviour: press button "manual config" (something like > this) *while it is searching in data bases* don't wait till the end of > the query... > > This extremely logical! I need and want more like this! Well, in fact I was looking into this m

Re: icedove configuration problem [SOLVED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11/08/2013 11:22, François Patte a écrit : > Bonjour, > > As thunderbird is banned from debian, I try to setup my email > account using icedove. > > It fails! For 2 reasons: > > 1- I presume that icedove check if my email address is a "valid" > a

Re: Over 2.5 GB ram problem (SOLVED?)

On 07/17/2013 10:57 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 7/16/2013 6:30 PM, Gary Roach wrote: I can't say that the memory is absolutely good but can say with a high degree of certainty that it is the correct memory for the system. I gave you the exact JEDEC specs the 4x 1GB DIMMs need to be, and you did

Re: network unrachable problem [SOLVED]

On 06/04/13 23:46, Bob Proulx wrote: > Tony van der Hoff wrote: >> Well, From reading the man pages (always a good idea) I discovered that >> ifplugd calls ifup/ifdown to do its actual work. >> Manually invoking "ifdown eth0" returned an error "eth0 not configured", > > Ah! So that is the problem

  1   2   3   4   5   >